Idk, when you look at the entire picture, does Trump not have the far easier path to 270 this year? He only has to win 2 states (PA & GA) and that’s it, he wins. Kamala has to win at the minimum 3, and if she loses PA, it becomes even harder for her. Trump could just spend all of his money campaigning in those 2 states and get back in the White House. Yet these odds seem to disagree with me.

Am I trippin?

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    To “win?” No - not really.

    But I don’t think that matters much.

    Honestly, I think that Trump and the overt fascists and plutocrats who are backing him fully intend to get him into office or destroy the country trying - that if he doesn’t win legitimately, he’ll “win” through fraud, or through the machinations of the brazenly corrupt and compromised supreme court, or through violent revolution.

    His backers - the Heritage Foundation and the rest of the fascists and Musk and Thiel and the rest of the plutocrats and so on - don’t just want to try to get him into office - they want to destroy American liberty and democracy. It’s not even so much about him specifically - he’s just the right combination of charismatic and shallow that they see him as their opportunity to impose the autocracy they want. And I don’t think they’re going to let anything stand in their way. So whether or not he actually wins the election isn’t even really relevant, other than to the degree that that will determine what other strategies they might have to, and will, implement.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      He wasn’t even able to do that when he had the full power of the presidency at his disposal. The reality is that he has a lot of grandiose plans that far exceed his competence.

      • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        He doesn’t need to do it this time - he has a veritable army of fascists, a brazenly corrupt and compromised supreme court and a squad of billionaire plutocrats to do it all on his behalf, and not coincidentally they have a detailed blueprint in Project 2025 that tells them exactly what to do, step by step, to transform the US into a christofascist/plutocratic autocracy.

        All Trump has to do this time around is just carry on being Trump, while all those other people do all the dirty work.

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        While he had fake electors last time, they weren’t as widespread as they’ve become over the last 4 years. He also didn’t have the coordination of the Heritage Foundation either like he does now. He also didn’t have a House of Representatives willing to steal the election last time.

        He has a lot going for his machinations this time.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Polymarket currently has Harris ahead at 52-45 plus minor candidates. Yeah I think that favors her too much. Trump has been off the rails (I mean more than usual) lately but he could get it together. Also, Harris is a blank slate upon whom many place unfounded hopes.

    The TV debates will probably be more significant than usual this year. IDK who they will favor. We shall see.

  • morphballganon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You make it sound like T winning PA would be easy

    I could just as easily say H winning Texas would put it in the bag for her

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    That assumes that the rest of the states shake out as expected. NC and Ohio have been polling a lot closer than expected. Winning one of those would offset a loss in PA or GA.

    There’s a reason why we still hold the actual election, and don’t base the winner just on polls.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I personally believe trump will be president. It’s just a given at this point. Will I vote against him? Yes.

    But I am a realist. It’s just what is going to happen.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am 100% voting for Kamala, fuck MAGA. But like you said, if we’re being realistic, thanks to the Electoral College and Protest Votes. Trump’s path to 270 is far easier.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think/hope the red states become more purple this go around. Might even flip a few small ones by the time November comes 🤞

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I saw the rumor that Trump’s internal polling showed him below 50% in Ohio, if true, that would be huge for Harris

      • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 month ago

        My corner of TN is very red. I noticed the other day, whereas in 2020 the trump signs were all over, none are out now. Don’t see the shirts. And I’ve found a lot of blue friends here in the last year.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looking from half-way around the world, Trump wining seemed very likely until Kamala became the candidate. And now no result seems more likely than the other.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    37% of Americans can’t afford to pay a $400 bill without taking on further debt, and that means 37% of Americans can’t afford to miss a day of work to vote.

    It really could go either way.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You may well be right and that’s why it’s vital not to be complacent. Donate, volunteer, vote. Get out there and make a Harris win happen!

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think the odds at the moment still favor Trump but Harris has run a solid campaign so far. We’re still in “it’s anyone’s game” territory but Trump is constantly losing ground.

    A poll recently showed that more Americans trust Harris with the economy and that’s a really bad sign for Trump.

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think Kamala has much better odds than Biden did this time around. The assassination attempt on Trump was crazy and solidified his supporters.

    I think it’s a closer race than either side thinks

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Harris has to win 3 states, PA, MI, and WI. Losing any one of those three throws it to Trump.

    It is going to be a nail biter!

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s what I’m saying, I think MI will go to Harris, but if she loses PA, Trump just needs NV & AZ and he’s going back to the White House.

      While if Harris loses PA, she HAS to win GA, there’s no path to victory for her without GA in this scenario.

        • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think that’ll matter, Trump BARELY won MI in 2016 by less than 10k votes, and that was with Russian Psyop Jill Stein stealing votes from Hillary there.

          In 2020, Michigan had the highest youth turnout in the country and Biden won it by 150k votes.

          I don’t see how Trump can flip that state back, those are insane margins.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Clinton in Michigan was just stupid, she thought it was in the bag and failed to campaign there. That hurt her more than Stein did.

            But the youth vote is fickle, they turned against Biden there this year, he was never going to win MI which is one of the reasons he dropped out.

            • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Regardless of turnout, I just don’t see a 150k margin being overcome in just 4 years. Harris would have to lose an insane amount of voters and Trump would have to gain a lot of voters all within 4 years. I just don’t see him winning that state.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          MI will be complicated because of the Muslim vote and Gaza.

          Which is just bizarre, because Trump has shown he is much more willing to suck up to whatever Netanyahu wants than Biden or Harris.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            It doesn’t matter to trump voters what he shows, they only believe what he says, not what he does.

            The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

    • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Losing any one of those three throws it to Trump.

      Unless she win NC or OH. She’s doing really well in both.

      I think this is going to be a giant blowout win for Kamala. But, please, no one get cocky! Everyone has to actually vote!

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t see NC, OH, AZ, NV, or GA going to Harris. It’s wishful thinking, but I wouldn’t count on any of them.

  • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you totally unplugged from informational media, and went to live out your days engaging only in the things which bring you joy, would you be able to tell who the current sitting president was solely by indirect observation? People like to blame presidents for “the price at the pump” and other miniscule day-to-day things. But is there any substance to that?