I’ve decided undecided voters have low critical thinking skills and/or are attention seekers

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t imagine how anyone looks at Trump,

    the people ‘undecided’ arent looking at anything. they just dont consume media in the same manner, if at all, as the rest of us. there are humans who actively avoid all politics, and in the united states this is actually very easy to do.

    we have bred an entire class of humans who just do not give a shit, and its hard to get them to suddenly care ‘this cycle’

      • Poayjay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Literally every election is decided by the “undecided”. Democrats vote democrat and republicans vote republican. It rare that anyone changes party. What determines elections is if democrats can get people who wouldn’t otherwise vote to vote. Every time people turn out, democrats win. When people are uninterested they lose. Those ~50k people in suburbs of swing states are not unimportant, they are the only thing that matters.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, every election is decided by the majority of those who did decide.

        • niucllos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This premise gets thrown around a lot but I actually disagree. “Every time people turn out” is always also thrown in there like some arbitrary thing–when I think the past several election cycles have shown that when there are younger, more progress candidates who make it past the primaries turnout shoots up. Courting the 3% uninformed flip-floppers by moving right is a losing strategy when you could be motivating your own party to turn out by moving left and driving turnout up. There’s no money in that though, so dumb centrists get wooed

          • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            When/if democrats can Energize the base, they don’t need to give a shit about undecideds. but until then, we are stuck pandering to the people we know will actually show up to and wait at the voting booth

          • whereisk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s also a mistruth that people don’t change their minds. Look at the rise and fall of any brand, religion or cult - some people had to change their minds.

        • Marthirial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Literally every election is decided by the “undecided

          That and voter suppression. If everybody could vote easily, the GOP would never win an election.

          • triptrapper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s absolutely voter suppression. Every election we have 1/3 of the electorate that doesn’t cast a vote. We could court these couple million undecideds or we could fix the system and have automatic registration and even compulsory voting. And then, you’re absolutely right, Republicans would never win again.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          in a world where the winner is decided by < 5%

          It’s a false analysis to claim that. Using that same reasoning, you could as credibly claim that any election is decided by a single vote, the one that gives the winner the majority (or plurality). But that’s not actionable information in any way, it’s just tautologically true, as is any salami-slicing analysis.

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They actually just don’t believe the media that goes against what they believe, and at this point I can hardly blame them. There are enough lies, distortions, out of context quotes and mischaracterizations that it is pretty easy to simply disregard things that other people accept as truth. Political season in the United States has a huge cloud, a fog of war, and whoever says their “truth” the loudest and most persistently controls public perception, the narrative. It’s discouraging and overwhelming to try to sort out the real truth because there is a rapid and continuous stream of propaganda that can’t possibly be investigated and verified. So people go back to their instincts, which are mostly guided by their friends, social groups, and their self-curated media feed. Everything else is disregarded as fake news.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some of them are also “goldfish voters.” These people only engage with whatever political message has been delivered to them most recently. They literally can go from D to R and back again bumper sticker to bumper sticker.

      Then there are the obligate ego independents. Their only political belief is that they must vote for both parties some of the time. If they voted D last time then they will probably vote R this time. Because their identity is “independent” so they must manifest that, all reason be damned.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      there are humans who actively avoid all politics, and in the united states this is actually very easy to do.

      Man, I dont even live in the US, and US politics is inescapable. Of course Canada’s political climate is directly affected by what’s going on down there, so It’s probably harder to avoid here than somewhere across an ocean.