Is it time to make Election Day a federal holiday? 🗳️ Some say it would boost voter turnout and align the U.S. with other democracies, while others argue it could create challenges for hourly workers and cost millions. Dive into the debate over whether a federal voting holiday is the best way to strengthen democracy or if there are better solutions. Check out the full breakdown!

https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-votingrights/should-election-day-become-a-federal-holiday-weighing-the-benefits-and-drawbacks/

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We always have elections on a Sunday (you go to your assigned voting place, usually a school) and there’s I think two week period where you can vote in (official voting places placed in) libraries, malls, all kinds of places and you can pick whichever so there’s ample opportunity for everyone. I think mail-in system where you can vote at home and deliver the vote by mail is just for those who are abroad. There’s also the possibility of having people visit you at home to facilitate voting, meant for those who can’t move.

    • Constant Pain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Here in Brazil elections are always on Sunday, vote is mandatory and everybody vote the same day. By 8pm all votes are counted and the result is known.

      I always vote after lunch and it’s always empty. Because the vote is electronic, it’s very fast. I get there (we usually vote at schools too), show my photo ID (I use the ID app on my phone), use my fingerprint to unlock the voting machine, type the numbers and confirm, they return my phone and give a coupon to prove I voted and then I go eat a meat pastel and ice cream.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We don’t use electronic voting machines here. It’s all paper ballots. Vote counting is done for pre-voting day ballots so that the result of those is known at 20.00 and only then (at the same time the voting places close) they start counting the voting day ballots (well technically it’s the preliminary count after which the ballots are send to a recount for next day to check for errors). Calculating is done by hand but the result is known usually at around 23, before the recount and the actual final result is confirmed on next Wednesday at 18.00. But that’s a formality.

        After voting we usually do coffee or some do beer. “Election coffee” or “election beer” we call it.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    would definitely ensure higher turnout in most locations,but as is policy where i work no days off for holidays other than xmas and tday.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    No. All that needs to be done is make universal vote by mail the standard.

    My state has been doing it for 24 years now, this will be the 7th Presidential election (2000, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24) and 13th Congressional election. It works, it increases voter participation, there’s a built in paper trail, there’s nothing to not like about it.

    Remember how 2014 had a record low turnout for a mid-term election?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/11/10/voter-turnout-in-2014-was-the-lowest-since-wwii/

    "the lowest it’s been in any election cycle since World War II, according to early projections by the United States Election Project.

    Just 36.4 percent of the voting-eligible population cast ballots as of last Tuesday, continuing a steady decline in midterm voter participation that has spanned several decades. The results are dismal, but not surprising – participation has been dropping since the 1964 election, when voter turnout was at nearly 49 percent."

    Meanwhile, in my state:

    https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2014/11/voter_turnout_of_695_percent_i.html

    "Turnout in this fall’s election reached 69.5 percent, just half a percent short of turnout in 2010 and 2006 and 1.5 percent better than in 2002, Secretary of State Kate Brown said Wednesday.

    More than 1.5 million Oregonians cast ballots, a record high for a non-presidential election, while nearly 700,000 registered voters sat out."

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same way for Colorado. It’s all the benefit of electronic voting, but with the added safety of paper ballots. And it’s a format we’re all familiar with from school – bubble in our answer (just with a pen instead of a number 2 pencil), and then turn it in. The counters feed the ballots into the counting machine, which tallies up the votes, then the ballots are stored in nice boxes, which can be retrieved and hand-counted on the off-chance the machines get hacked or otherwise…tampered with (Tina Peters, I’m looking at YOU…as you go to jail for 9 years! :3).

    • Hannes@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is one argument against everyone voting by mail that I accept:
      People could be making “let’s go vote together”-meetups to make sure their friends are voting what they “should” - which would destroy freedom and privacy of the vote which are fundamental.
      The same can also happen in abusive relationships where one partner can take away the freedom to vote what they want from the other by standing behind them when they fill out their ballot.

      Voting by mail is safe, but because of those two it should NEVER be the de-facto standard. It’s great to have more people voting - but whoever can should still vote personally if possible.

      I know the setup of the voting booths is way worse in the US than here in Germany so both the way to them and the lines in front of them are longer, so that decision might flip towards voting by mail quicker, but imho voting in person should remain the standard - just because noone can look over your shoulder when you’re making your cross in that setting

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Generally, it’s less “lets go vote together!” than it is “lets drop off our ballots together!”

        Coercive voting is a crime, in 24 years we haven’t seen an incidence of it yet, but that was one of the FUD arguments when we voted for it.

        “What’s to stop an employer from requiring employees to bring in their ballots and vote the company line?”

        Well, it’s a crime. If you don’t trust your employees to vote, do you trust that not one will rat you out?

        • Hannes@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          From my point of view both the police and the judges are getting heavily influenced by people with a less democratic agenda in mind.

          Something like that would’ve never worked years ago - but with 4 more years of Trump handpicking judges? I wouldn’t even be sure the Supreme Court would strike something lime that down if it’s done subtle enough.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I got home last night from work, voted, and ate dinner. Got up to go to work and tossed the ballot in my mailbox this morning. It was amazing. Being able to get an absentee ballot in NY has been absolutely wonderful.

      I am a bit worried about my signature though lol I can’t remember if I signed with my stupid fresh out of highschool “script” signature on previous ballots that I used on my social security card, or my general signature I’ve been using for everything for decades now…

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, if it gets rejected, they will let you know. Good news is you can always re-register and update your signature.

        Here, we have the motor voter registration, so it’s the same signature as my drivers license.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or, you know, at least make it happen on a weekend, like normal countries do. The whole thing is such a weird quirk among so many other weird quirks that serve no purpose.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        That doesn’t solve for people who work irregular shifts and don’t get weekends off, but may not have access to early or mail-in voting (which is where Republicans will take their insane restrictions if a holiday is made).

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Aren’t those exact people usually also working on a federal holiday as well?

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          For sure, but it covers most people and it’s such a simple solution that it’s the standard starting point. You can go further than that, but this is the least you can do.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think a combo covers everything if the Dems get a voting bill through:

            • Federal holiday
            • Early voting
            • Mail-in if requested
            • Absentee barriers lowered

            That would cover pretty much anything (I think?).

  • Newstart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here in Canada All employees who are Canadian citizens and 18 years of age or older are entitled to have three consecutive hours off on Election Day to vote. Voting hours in the Eastern time zone are from 9:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. If an employee’s hours of work do not allow for three consecutive hours off within this period, the employer must give them sufficient time off to meet the requirement of three consecutive hours.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    All of those drawbacks are bullshit.

    Early voting and mail in ballots should be more available to everyone. That’s not a reason not to make it a holiday.

    Private employers can’t be forced to observe a holiday. That’s not a reason not to make it a holiday. People required to work could still go before or after work, and would see reduced wait times because public employees would be able to go during work hours.

    Finding childcare for the day is a problem anyway, as polling places are often schools, and the kids are sent home anyway. If it was a holiday, you could take your kids with you to the polls and then go to the park. That’s almost a reason not to make it a holiday, but not really.

    If banks, post offices, and schools are all closed, a lot of businesses will also close because work slows down. Other employers, like retailers, food service, and entertainment venues like movie theaters would all see an uptick in business, and would probably offer extra pay for those shifts.

    Yes to mail in ballots. Yes to early voting. Yes to a national election holiday. Reduce the barriers to voting. No to ID laws. No to voter roll purges. No to proof of citizenship requirements.

    • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      ID and citizenship requirements seem like pretty basic requisites to voting, what’s wrong with those?

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because not everyone has an ID or proof that they are a citizen, and in the United States, you’re presumed innocent until proven guilty. When you register to vote, you fill out a form stating you are a citizen and elligible to vote. There are existing mechanisms to check that voters are eligible. If you lie or commit fraud, those are crimes. There’s a paper trail, and if it were an actual problem, there would be proof that it’s happening.

        Homeless people have the right to vote. Forgetful and disorganized people have the right to vote. Hermits and people who survive house fires have the right to vote. ID requirements or requiring proof of citizenship creates an unnecessary barrier that disenfranchises more legal voter than the illegal votes it prevents. Because that’s the point of them, they want to stop legal voters from voting.

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          But you can’t ignore very real problems with increasing the pool of ignorant voters, since whoever has the most access to that pool will have an advantage because these ignorant voters can be taken advantage of simply because they are ignorant. Should people be voting if they don’t know how the system works or what the candidates even stand for? If you can’t be bothered to care about it enough to go through minimal requirements, do we need to go out of our way to shove a ballot in their hands?

          And yes, I acknowledge that the kind of thinking I outlined above can be used to repress voters as well. I guess my point is that these policies cut both ways. It’s not such a clear cut answer as “give everyone a ballot”, because that can (and has) very very easily turn into “give them a ballot and suggest who they should vote for”.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, because ensuring everyone can vote is how I know I will always be able to vote. Democracy is about self-determination. There is no competency requirement for people making decisions for themselves.

            Now, if you told me we were going to have competency requirements for candidates, thats something I might support, depending on how it’s implemented.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Inconsistent access and inconsistent standards, for the most part.

        A classic example is how certain states (Texas, for instance) will assert that gun licenses qualify as a valid ID but state university student IDs will not. Another is in how IDs - like driver’s licenses - have a fee associated with registration and renewal, which amounts to a poll tax. A third is that citizenship isn’t necessarily a prerequisite for voting in municipal and state elections. So requiring someone to be a citizen before accessing a ballot becomes an unconstitutional burden at the state and local level.

        Then there’s the fact that we already have a voter id system. It’s called your voter registration card. You typically get one after you’ve registered to vote in your municipality. The fight over voter ID is that you need a second piece of identification on top of the registration card.

        Broadly speaking, if everyone was afforded equal access to a single uniform ID document at no cost, there wouldn’t be a problem. But so much of the Voter ID rules don’t establish homogeneous ID requirements. Implementation is left up to the states. So states with a history of hostility towards democratic rule can back-door disenfranchisement into the process of obtaining these documents.

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is currently no voter registration card where I’m from. All you have to do is say your name and they check you off. If you aren’t registered in the area, you can bring a piece of mail with your name and address to prove you live in that precinct, or someone to vouch for you, then you are given a ballot and they add you to the registration for next time. But yes it sounds like there is a lot of variation in how states implement or assure the integrity of their elections, and all of them are prone to certain kinds of abuse, whether it’s discouraging voters or vote harvesting or some other illegal mechanism for influencing elections in favor of the established powers.

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I live overseas so I’m eligible for an absentee ballot.

      I filled it out and submitted it a few weeks ago.

      It was all done through the government website for my state and email.

      Couldn’t be easier.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Over here all employers have to give employees 4h to vote. So if it’s open from 8 to 8 and you work from 8 to 4 they don’t have to give you time off, but if you work 8 to 6 they have to cut your shift at 4 instead.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unless they’re going to do something like require octuple pay for anyone working on an election day, which in turn would fuck up the financial math of any business thinking about opening that day, making it a holiday won’t fix anything.

    Mandate vote by mail federally. While your at it, copy Mexicos voter ID system and give everyone free voter ID’s.

  • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    In Australia we have pre-poll voting (early voting), mail-in ballots, and every election day is a Saturday - with democracy sausages.

        • dellish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, yes. Preferential voting is one key component, the other being a decent media so the public have an idea of what’s going on. Unfortunately Murdoch owns just about everything, and it’s a problem we’re still battling against.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            a decent media so the public have an idea of what’s going on

            You can’t have a decent media if it has been privatized, monopolized, and staffed with reactionaries.

            it’s a problem we’re still battling against.

            The problem is - as it has always been - a problem of moral hazard with regards to private interests generating income from public expenditures. The Murdochs aren’t simply ideological. Their control of the press affords an enormous windfall of state money via state contracts and grants, tax abatements, and revenue from privatized land and industry.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Easier solution than trying to have a single day off for everyone:

    Since early voting is a thing, all employers should be required to give workers 1 paid flex day during voting season so they can vote.

    They can even tie the flex day to evidence that they actually voted, so it truly encourages voting instead of just being an extra day off.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As it is, they record who votes. It’s how you can have multiple polling locations avaialbe but can only vote once.

        It’s not a huge leap from that to being able to prove to your employer that you voted.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Everyone that votes gets some variant of “i voted” sticker already, that changes every where, sooooo…

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think I’ve gotten one of those stickers once in my decades of voting. I never outright ask, and most times they’re out on the table or whatever… But no, they don’t give them out like they’re receipts.

          However, giving each person a receipt would probably be pretty trivial…

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            weird, I’ve gotten one of those stickers every time i’ve voted my entire life. i thought it was just a given.

      • RidderSport@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who cares about evidence of voting, you work enough days of the year, just take it for heavens sake. If I add up all days there are federal holidays in my country I get nearly 2 months worth and that is without paid or unpaid leave days you get from the employer

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s not about getting the day off: the goal is getting people to vote. Tying an extra day off to actually voting is more likely to get people to the polls

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, you give them the day off for election day. They know why they are off. If they’re going to vote, they’re going to vote. Simply giving everyone the day off is “getting people to vote.”

            Some sort of monitoring to make sure people are actually voting on the day is an absurd and pointless idea. If we’re going that far, then just do what Australia does and make it compulsory.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Look at it like vaccine mandates. They’re difficult politically and legally. I live in Texas where businesses were explicitly banned from requiring Covid vaccinations.

              So lots of businesses in Texas instead tied extra “personal holiday” days to showing evidence of vaccination. It wasn’t a requirement to be vaccinated, but a bonus incentive.

              • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’d be totally onboard with a system where they ran it as a tax incentive to vote. Better yet if it were a flat, fixed amount.

                Like, in every precinct, you get your name checked off in the voter roll when you vote. It makes no record of who you vote for, only that you did, in fact, go to the polls and exercised your right.

                Somehow export that data, send it to the IRS for cross referencing, and at tax time, if you voted in that year, it adds $100 to your tax return. Not a percentage of your income (which benefits the wealthy more than the poor) just a flat amount that basically is the government thanking you for voting. If you didn’t vote there’s no penalty… there’s just no reward.

                …that said, this system would depend completely on having election day become a national holiday with businesses closed, etc. Or at the very least, mandating that employers nationwide must schedule every worker for a half day, maximum, on election day, with the other half day being a paid holiday…which would cause an absolute uproar in American politics.

                • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Don’t do it on Election Day. Have our spread across early voting and election day. It’ll alleviate the long waits on election day itself and allow employers to stay open since not everyone is off the same day.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t really think we need to police the extra day off. If someone was unable to vote that day for some reason, they shouldn’t be penalized.

      • hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        While I agree we should police it, have you ever worked for a big corporation, they are going to police it…

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          The law can be written to prevent that easily. One flex day off for every employee during the election season is mandatory to give people the opportunity to vote.

          That is how every other major holiday is handled. Just because I get a winter holiday break every year doesn’t mean that my employer checks to see if I was Santa eligible before I get the vacation.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The goal isn’t to get people an extra day off, it’s to get them to vote.

        When I go to a conference or take paid time for education I’m required to prove what I was doing.

        We should also fight to get people more general vacation time, sure. But as far as mandating days off for voting I think it makes sense to make sure that they use that day to vote.

        Otherwise we’ll just end up with a lot of cheap weekend cruises popping up to take advantage of all the extra holiday time around elections with no increase in voter turnout.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          God, Americans are so cucked when it comes to employee rights (I’m an American). Oh no, someone might get an extra day off!? Disgusting!

          I get your point, and yes people should use the day to vote. But trying to mandate it, or police it in some way to make sure you didn’t accidentally give your employee a day off for “no reason,” is fucking absurd.

          I imagine in most cases, it would probably even cost more to monitor, than the amount they lost for not having that employee for one day.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            This isn’t about making sure businesses make more money. It’s about incentivizing people to vote.

            My business gave extra time off to people who got Covid vaccines because it incentivizes people to do something that’s good for them and for society. For people who were already getting the vaccines it was a bonus day, and it gave the push for people on the fence.

            It should be the same with voting. The reality is most people do have the opportunity to vote, but choose not to take the time to do it. An extra holiday won’t change that.

            Giving them an extra day off no-strings attached is a good thing. They should get an extra month. But if we are specifically trying to get people to vote, then that particular day off should come with strings just like my vaccine day.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Your response to me saying how cucked we are here with regards to employee rights is this?

              My business gave extra time off to people who got Covid vaccines because it incentivizes people to do something that’s good for them and for society. For people who were already getting the vaccines it was a bonus day, and it gave the push for people on the fence.

              Wow, how magnanimous of them! I’m sure that having a vaccinated work force during a global pandemic that was killing millions to prevent your employees from dropping like flies had nothing to do with it… They just wanted to give you guys that “bonus” day. How sweet of them.

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yeah - how dare they do something that’s good for the employees AND their bottom line! The nerve!

                Though actually not true because I work in municipal government where there is no profit or shareholders. If we get extra money it goes into things like overdue infrastructure repair.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  It’s not good for all employees, only the ones who vote.

                  Makes me think of the people who want to enforce drug testing on welfare recipients. Costs more money to enforce than if they had just given them the benefits in the first place. But then we would be giving it to “people who ‘shouldn’t’ have it,” or “don’t deserve it,” and we just can’t have that can we?

                  It’s just a bullshit worldview.

                  Give everyone the day off, encourage voting and make sure that they know that it’s literally the reason they have that day off from work. Because of the people that were voted in, etc. Show them how important it is… Then hope they vote. Change the culture around it.

                  Again, unless you want to do it like Australia and make it compulsory.

                  Other than that, you’re literally just wasting money just to make sure a bunch of people don’t have off work who (you deem) “don’t deserve it.” Nah, fuck all that. Just let people enjoy their fucking life, Jesus Christ.

                  Edit: now that I think about it… I have to wonder how you’d feel if this were a religious holiday, and only the people who observe (and we’re talking, go to services, etc.) and can prove it, get those days off… Sorry atheists and agnostics, no Christmas or Easter holidays for you. And only the kids of the practicing Jews get off school for Ros Hashanah.

                  Or to keep it secular, only black people should get off for Martin Luther King Day right? Or to be even more specific, black Americans who are descendants of slaves. If you cannot prove that, sorry, no MLK Day for you.

                  Let’s just start an entire new federal agency meant to confirm that only the people who are associated with each holiday can get that day off. Because there’s gonna be a whole lot of paperwork. Lots of jobs though, I guess!

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          God forbid Americans get more holiday time, especially considering that the rest of the developed world tends to get a lot more than we do.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The purpose of a day off for election day is to get people to vote. Tying it to a requirement to actually vote (not even necessarily on the same day) gives an incentive to vote instead of just another day off.

            They should be getting an extra month of vacation time in general, absolutely, but that has nothing to do with incentivizing voting.

            I got extra time off work for having a Covid vaccination. Since I was getting vaccinated anyway, it was just more time off just like a voting day would be. But for some people, the extra time off was enough incentive to get them to go to Walgreens and get a shot. If they’d just given everybody extra time off for Covid vaccinations without us having to prove that we did it, then those who weren’t planning to get the shot still wouldn’t have. And the point was to get people vaccinated for public health.

            • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The problem with that is that it incentivizes people who are uninformed about politics to vote randomly for a day off. Our issue is not that everyone needs to vote, but that everyone who chooses to is able to and not hindered by a company.

              If they want to incentivize people to get informed and get involved, then they should abolish the electoral college so people will feel like their votes count in states where they are a minority. Reinstating voting rights for felons would also get people motivated, because people who have been burned by the system may want to work to change it.

              Even with all that, there will be people who do not care, do not learn, and will not want to vote, and they should be given that option. They have deemed themselves unqualified, and that should be believed.

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s perfectly legal to turn in a blank ballot. When there’s an uncontested candidate running for office in my area that I do not support our I don’t know the difference between the candidates I simply don’t select a candidate for that position while voting for the candidates and issues I do understand.

                • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yes, but if someone intends not to vote at all, why waste their time and make lines longer by having them turn in a totally blank ballot?

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I forget what country it is, but one has a rule that you can only vote in your place of birth on a holiday. So, people come together for reunion and they all go out and vote. Swell idea, IMO.

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Uh…not a great idea.

      Suppose my parents made the decision to move to Alaska instead of Colorado for my birth, then moved to Colorado where I grew up. I’d be asked to vote in Alaska’s elections, despite having no ties there, no stake in the outcome, and no reason to care about the issues. And if I’m to vote a Colorado ballot, why not let me vote that ballot from Colorado? If I want to go to a family reunion, I’ll go to a family reunion. I don’t need to be forced to go to one by being forced to vote in a state I no longer live in.