• vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    As someone recently told me, they don’t worry about saving lives, they worry about saving souls.

    You need to abide by the quaint rules of the magical sky daddy for that, even if they don’t make sense.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      But the Skyfather himself has given us directions to induce a miscarriage with a tabernacle dust smoothie.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I dont think it really has anything to do with that. A state recently sued due to abortion and teen pregnancy reduction efforts leading to decreased teenage pregnancy rates arguing something along the lines of our populations are going down and it will cost us in population, political representation, and federal resources.

      This is about cheap/free labor, disenfranchising women, and maintaining a permanent disabled and poverty-stricken underclasses that keep everyone on up in line with the hierarchy

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except clearly any aborted fetus would immediately go to heaven based on what’s written in the bible. In fact, heaven should be absolutely completely full of dead babies based on miscarriages, stillbirths, etc. if you believe that they get a soul at the moment of conception.

      So that logic doesn’t really make sense either. Which is par for the course.

      • slickgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Actually, nobody goes to heaven when they die (according to the bible). Everyone must wait until judgement day when all the graves, etc, open and we all face judgement at that point. This surprised me when I first learned it because it goes against all the Christian culture I’ve ever been taught and experienced.

        So grandma isn’t currently in heaven no matter how good she was.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s a huge relief that perhaps my grandparents haven’t seen my embarrassing moments after all.

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          and judgement is not “brought back to life just to be sent back immediately”… no, it will be a good span of time to live without evil on the earth…

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Uhh no? Non-baptized souls go to limbo according to Christian theology.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          3 days ago

          That depends on which flavor of Christianity you’re looking at, but even the Catholics don’t think they go to Limbo, the pope had an entire study done on it, and the result was “we hope they go to heaven but we don’t know”

          A lot of the other denominations don’t subscribe to the original sin shtick, and therefore babies would go to heaven even without being baptized.

          • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I always loved the “do uncontacted remote tribes that haven’t heard of God or Jesus go to heaven?” question. So far everyone has answered yes. And then you realize that Christians could save everyone, everywhere, forever, just by destroying all their literature, not teaching religion, and letting it die with them. One sacrificial generation and everyone is saved forever.

            But they won’t do it because of greed and pride, the core aspects of their belief system.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I was juuuuuuust about to explain how making sense isn’t a requirement to them, until I saw your last sentence. Then I knew you already get it.

  • davidagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They want men to choose who lives or dies. They absolutely do not want women to be in charge of anything. That’s why no exceptions in the case of rape and incest. A man made a decision, they don’t want a woman to have the power to reverse it.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They don’t actually care about life, they just don’t want women to have control over their bodies.

  • ammonium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think that can be explained, but tell me how someone can be in favor of the death penalty but be against assisted suicide.

    • spizzat2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      but be against assisted suicide

      No free hand outs! You gotta work for your death!

      /s

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    In the end, it’s because they’re told that that’s the way it is.

    Abortion makes a an easy political point. Vote for the children.

    Being hard on crime and executing people, That’s another easy political point. Vote for the law abiding citizens.

    They don’t care that those two things are at odds They don’t care about life or death. They care about their own exact situation, and don’t really give a rat’s ass about anyone else. They believe that the team they’re backing gives them the best advantage, and that’s absolutely all they care about. Beyond that, it’s simply consuming and regurgitating the propaganda, self-perpetuating.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because it’s not about saving the lives of unborn babies and it never has been.

    It’s about curtailing choice.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The common thread is harm and punishment. They wish harm to those they would punish for the transgressions they make up in their heads

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is, but they will persist because their motivation has nothing to do with rational thinking.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s a jeebus said so thing. Babies need to be baptized and sinners need to be sent to hell.

    • umt@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a pastime of liberal pundits to point out that the pro-life governor of some flyover state also supports the death penalty and so on and so forth. We get incredulous and infuriated at their blatant hypocrisy. We call them stupid, which really sets them off […] They don’t think of themselves as self-serving hypocrites or idiots who can’t keep their facts straight long enough to form a cogent argument in continuity with the rest of their ideology. We try to describe this as “cognitive dissonance” or other give other armchair diagnosis that doesn’t fully capture what’s going on. I’d like to give them more credit than that. They clearly believe in something, and in that context their words and actions would make sense, but it’s not what they’re self-advertising when you ask what they believe in.

      From still the best description of american conservative thought I’ve read: an essay by u/kin7es: https://wiki.dlma.com/belief-system-of-republicans

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Everyone has a spot on the big food pyramid of the socio-political hierarchy. Good, smart, and hardworking people of merit make their way to the top. Bad, dumb, and lazy people go to the bottom. For convenience sake, this hierarchy is color-coded. In a zero-sum world, everyone who gets to the top has to knock someone down a rung to make room.

        I would argue this is how republican voters think. That they’re in the right because they are voting for the right of the individual. But on the other hand I think Republican policy makers give zero shits about a person’s self worth and actualization but rather they know that they need to feed the machine and we need the poor babies born to do so, and on the other hand they can demonstrate some form of moral high ground by deciding life and death.

        There’s no death penalty for defrauding elections, molding the healthcare (or really any corporate) system to work for harm and profit, avoiding taxation through infinite shell companies and offshore bank accounts. Those things are celebrated as “beating the system”

        Still to this day everyone that claims “Plandemic” is chasing some invisible elite power structure that somehow only includes democrats, without ever getting mad at the corporations that profited immensely off developing covid vaccines and charging market price for them as a portion of the world was dying.

  • CM400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just guessing here, but I’d assume it’s because the unborn have potential and the bad guys had their chance. I don’t agree, but that’s what I assume being around some people like that…

  • Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    IS it a contradiction? I don’t agree with the death penalty or anti-abortion position, but I don’t see some essential link between either position. You can hold two different beliefs about two different things is how come.

      • Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Sure, but OP didn’t ask, ‘How can people call themselves pro-life but are be for the death penalty?’ I’m not one to hang onto whatever catch phrases or name a movement lands with. Should* I expect the land back movement to, say, lay down on the ground as a for of protest? ‘BUT LAND BACK IS IN THE NAAAAAAAME’. Do we think defund the police want there to be nobody to apprehend, say, right-wing terrorists?

        Edit; accidentally a word