Summary

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced a resolution to ban transgender women from using female bathrooms in the Capitol, citing “women’s rights” and opposing the “radical left.”

The move comes ahead of Rep.-elect Sarah McBride (D-Del.), the first openly transgender member of Congress, taking office.

McBride criticized the measure as a divisive distraction from real issues like housing and healthcare costs.

LGBTQ advocates condemned the resolution as discriminatory, aligning it with broader Republican anti-trans policies emphasized in their platform and political ads.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        The measure would prohibit any lawmakers and House employees from “using single-sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological sex.”

        So yes

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Ah, okay, they covered their bases. But conservatives forget trans men exist all the time, so it’s probably an afterthought.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Oh, I expect they forgot trans men existed when they wrote the law. Once extremely masculine trans men start using the women’s bathroom, as they are legally illogically required to do, Republicans will backpedal…who am I kidding, that wouldn’t happen until midterms at the earliest, and by then they’ll just be shooting trans people.

            I’m sorry for the state of your country. I hope mine doesn’t follow, though they seem to be.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I say replace all the bathrooms with genderless-only ones. You can’t use them if you have any gender, sorry.

  • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think I rarely see the so-called disgust reflex in full throttle, as I see it in terfs attacking trans women. They are literally acting like a five-inch cockroach is climbing up their ankle, and they can’t help it. There is no amount of TERFism propaganda that can do that, they just must be the most homophobic people in existence, on par with people who flat out murder trans women. No doubt about it, they dehumanize trans women and would mass murder them with not a shed of remorse. Fuck TERFs, really.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry Nancy. Just like all of the straight men out there, trans women don’t want to touch you either.

    You don’t have to introduce legislature protecting yourself from non-existent threats.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The patriot act says hi.

      Along with like… Half the shift from 2001-2005.

      And if we keep going we will be here all day.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Given that there will be only one openly trans member of Congress, you can assume any time she goes to the restroom some Republican will report on which bathroom she goes into.

      Nobody is as concerned with other people’s genitals as conservatives.

      And they’ll cite all the fines that shitgibbon from Georgia got for not wearing a mask and trying to bring guns into Congress as proof they can.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They plan to set up a genital inspection booth in front of the restrooms where a eunuch will examine all persons wishing to use the restroom.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      By vibe. If you’re passable you’re fine, if you don’t visibly match your gender presentation well enough, jail

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      honestly, that would be awesome. completely private stalls. a common area to wash hands or whatever.

      • salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was at a bar that did this. Each toilet in its own little room (no stalls with gaps along the floor and doors). Besides a little initial confusion to make sure I wasn’t walking into the wrong restroom, it was perfectly fine.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        No no. I think it was the Stockholm airport, for example. Each private stall had a loo and sink and like 1/2 gaps at the bottom; perhaps in case of flooding. It was the private spa of airport bathrooms.

        My family there says it’s less about protecting people of different attributes from our own : they just can’t be arsed to delineate when it makes no difference and costs more to maintain.

        Mix the bathrooms, ensure individual privacy, and everybody still poops.

  • grumpo_potamus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    When Rep. Nancy Mace (R - S. Carolina) goes running into the bathroom to plaster the bowl with a putrid, explosive shit followed by a series of wet farts, she doesn’t want anyone else in there as that would be embarrassing. Especially if they saw her leave without washing her hands.