Ding Ding Ding

It comes down to this, the heavyweight desktop championship between two powers in the Linux world.

In the blue corner, we have the mighty KDE, KDE comes with a wealth of customization options and good features with every update. It serves a nice alternative to windows 10 or 11s desktop and itself as an OS.

KDE has got so good that even legendary distro, Fedora, wishes to use it in its dealings.

In the grey/black corner, we have GNOME, This is a heavy distro with some ram usage, but it strives to be a simple desktop for usage and has had some good features every new version it comes packaged in as well.

GNOME has had a long history much like KDE, But controversial changes from its older brother.

However… big name distros like Ubuntu have used it across millions of machines in different sectors.

What desktop do you favour and why? Explain your thoughts.

Round 2… GO!

Ding

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, KDE’s customization is overwhelming in my opinion. I like my OS like I like my boss: “support me, get out of my way, and let me do my work”. Gnome does exactly that.

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    KDE, because it’s familiar yet customisable. Gnome is just too strange for me, and doesn’t seem to allow me to un-strange it.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same. GNOME is too “appleish” for me. KDE customization is amazing.

  • Artopal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Changed to Cinnamon (Linux Mint) after GNOME 3 and Ubuntu’s Unity went bonkers, then changed to KDE Plasma some years ago.

    I think KDE is constantly working to improve the desktop paradigm. GNOME tried to change the paradigm… I didn’t like what I saw. I’m too old to learn new tricks.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn this thread really makes me feel like a minority, but I prefer GNOME! It comes useful out of the box, sane defaults, easy to extend without ripping out the soul of how it functions. Best of all it has a new and interesting direction for the desktop UI rather than just copying Windows. It has some original ideas that really serve it well.

  • d4f0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I like both. I prefer KDE for keyboard and mouse use and GNOME for touchscreen use.

  • lancalot@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Initially, I was drawn to KDE Plasma for familiarity. Therefore, when installing Linux for the first time, I chose a distro with KDE Plasma. Which happened to be Fedora Kinoite 35, a very new distro at the time. It was clearly buggy and after fiddling with it for some time, I just had to rebase to Silverblue (and GNOME) for the lack of alternatives.

    Thankfully, I actually happened to really like GNOME. This was on a laptop and GNOME’s touchpad gestures just felt very satisfying and intuitive; much better than anything else I had experienced before. Its (intended) workflow also made a lot of sense that way.

    GNOME has really grown on me ever since. And while I’ve revisited KDE Plasma to see what I was supposedly missing out on, I simply stuck to GNOME as it felt cleaner and more elegant.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Linux desktop environments is the Trans rights of politics. Very easy to debate, everyone has an opinion, but not where the focus should be

    Turns on reply notifications and sticks phone in butt

  • AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m pretty biased since I have been using KDE for a few years and only switched to Gnome this week to properly try it out so maybe I’ll change my mind but I doubt I will.

    IMO KDE has better theming and is more uniform across a wider variety of apps. It has support for community themes out of the box and it feels like the components are modular so you can have a different colour title bar compared to the app window etc

    • Dolphin > Nautilus
    • Kate > Gedit
    • Konsole > Terminal

    These are the 3 main default apps I use on both DEs. Dolphin has way more customisability and looks better but Nautilus has a fantastic multi-file rename with the option for find and replace built in.

    For me, Kate is like the vlc of documents. It will open anything and everything whereas I’ve had a couple of “could not open” errors from gedit this week. I also prefer Kate to Vscode.

    Konsole by default switches tabs with ctrl tab but Terminal doesn’t and thats basically my only issue with it.

    Gnome seems to still require you to install a browser extension to use Shell Extensions.

    KDE widgets are fantastic, I love having system monitors in a hidden panel at the top of my screen so I can really easily check system resource usage. I haven’t found anything similar on Gnome yet.

    KDE Connect is such a brilliant app, it wouldn’t launch for me on Gnome but there is GSConnect for Gnome but its a 3rd party app

    By default on KDE, if you shake your mouse the cursor gets bigger and there doesn’t seem to be a size limit which is so fun to do lol

    Going from Plasma 5 to 6 was a nightmare for me but its probably because I was using EndeavourOS so the updates were sooner and more frequent.

    Overall I think Gnome looks and feels a bit outdated and clunky and KDE looks and feels more modern with better integration across apps but that might just be QT vs GTK

    I do plan on continuing to use Gnome for at least another 2 months to give it a fair try but I will almost always recommended KDE because I prefer the look and feel

    • Jiří Král@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Gnome seems to still require you to install a browser extension to use Shell Extensions.

      You can download the Extension Manager from Flathub. You don’t have to use a browser to install extensions at all.

      KDE widgets are fantastic, I love having system monitors in a hidden panel at the top of my screen so I can really easily check system resource usage. I haven’t found anything similar on Gnome yet.

      There are extensions for that in Gnome. I would mention “Vitals” or “Astra Monitor” if you want to go overkill.

      Konsole by default switches tabs with ctrl tab but Terminal doesn’t and thats basically my only issue with it.

      Default Gnome terminal is bad. Even Fedora which is a distro that ships almost every DE without any changes switched from the default Gnome terminal to Ptyxis. Ptyxis is probably still not enough for power users, but at least it has more settings including the ability edit keyboard shortcuts and looks better.

      By default on KDE, if you shake your mouse the cursor gets bigger and there doesn’t seem to be a size limit which is so fun to do lol

      There’s also an extension for that in Gnome although it probably does not have this funny “feature”.

      • AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thank you! I’ve been hesitant to install a whole bunch of extensions but vitals and astra monitor look great, I’m going to try them out this week and see which I prefer.

        I’ve been avoiding flathub, it just doesn’t seem like my cup of tea but I may have to reconsider and take a proper look at it because it sounds better than a browser extension ngl

        I was just so surprised that a terminal that supports tabs doesn’t have generic tab switching, at least I know I’m not crazy now for not enjoying Gnome terminal lol

        I promise the giant cursor is a useful feature even though so many people have thought it was a weird bug lol I constantly do it when I’m trying to figure out how to word an email and on the very rare occasion where I can’t find my cursor it has actually been helful!

  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    kde without a doubt. I tried so many times to get into gnome,even using fedora and always failed after a couple of days and went back to plasma.

    I just accepted it in the end and stopped even caring that gnome exists. Competition is good though and I do hope gnome keeps going.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    You didn’t mention KDE’s lack of any adequate stability. That’s what makes it incomparable to GNOME. They serve completely different use cases.

    • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      KDE Plasma is wonderfully stable if you mean reliable, if you mean unchanging then yeah, it has quite a few changes.

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        i know i’ll get downvoted but this was my experience last time i tried kde a few weeks ago (kubuntu and fedora kde):

        • cool animations but stuttery as hell

        • browser randomly consuming 10% of cpu, making everything else slow as if it was using 100% (tested: firefox, librewolf, floorp, brave)

        • programs refusing to install

        • programs refusing to open

        • editing the taskbar often resulted in all the items going on top of each other, i couldn’t move them until i rebooted. couldn’t find an option to reset the whole thing

        • i put cpu and gpu temps in the system monitor and it always borked after it had been closed a few minutes

        • kded5 or something like that constantly popped up wanting to create a new wallet. couldn’t figure out how to disable. guides pointed to a configuration file that didn’t exist on my system

        idk if it’s an nvidia thing but none of these happen on other DEs

          • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            well yeah i tried ubuntu a couple years back and i remember having some issues with it too.

            weird thing is that mint has never had any issues even though it’s based on ubuntu. not even nvidia related issues.

        • lemmus@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s more of a distro problem than KDE. I have nvidia toi, and I admit, it bugs sometimes out.

          • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            well, cinnamon works great on mint and fedora, and i have had less (none) gpu related issues on mint than i did even on windows. kde wouldn’t play nice with my old pc components either and gpu is the only thing that i kept, so i would suspect it’s some weirdness between my gpu and kde.

            and too bad i can’t go with amd because i need hdmi 2.1

            • lemmus@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Rel man, I got pretty good nvidia gpu, but its 10 yo, it never played well with linux, but I feel like recently its much smoother experience on KDE wayland, before I had to use xorg as it was unusable on wayland. I think new major version (6) + constant updates to wayland made it usable, thats why i praise KDE so much, great DE and all their apps (like KDE connect, filelight, partition manager etc.).

      • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        sorry, i love plasma and i’d use it over gnome any day of the week, but there are still a ton of papercuts that make me feel uneasy about recommending it to anyone else. gnome is boring and it personally slows me down, but i feel safer setting up a corporate workstaion with gnome knowing the user won’t break something by accident

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I meant reliability. It’s bad if you use ANY feature besides virtual desktops and app opening. In my understanding “stability” is stability of ALL features of the program, no matter how rarely they’re used.

        • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It really isn’t, at least in my experience. And I have an Nvidia card!

          All software beyond a moderate complexity has bugs.

          • astro_ray@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            It really isn’t, at least in my experience

            works in my machine is an opinion not an argument. Different people have different expectations and experiences.

            • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Doesn’t work on my machine is an opinion not an argument. Different people have different expectations and experiences.

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It really isn’t, at least in my experience. And I have an Nvidia card!

            Oh then it makes sense why you argued. However it’s important to keep in mind that experience can vary among users. For example, in my case Plasma was very unstable on an Intel iGPU.

            All software beyond a moderate complexity has bugs.

            Not an excuse tbh.

            • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Not an excuse tbh.

              The thing to do is participate in the beta programs and report any bugs you find, as you’re having so much instability you would be an ideal participant whereas me with my smooth running wouldn’t.

              • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s not what I’m saying. KDE releases untested and buggy builds to stable. It makes it unstable software. If you’re a KDE fan, I understand, but don’t reject objective facts.

            • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You didn’t mention KDE’s lack of any adequate stability. That’s what makes it incomparable to Gnome.

              But then also:

              However it’s important to keep in mind that experience can vary among users.

              Oh the irony.

  • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    personally i find gnome to be kinda weird to use and kde has been so completely crippled with bugs and performance issues every time i have given it a shot (may be a skill issue on my end), that i still have to vote for gnome.

    cinnamon ftw.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use Mint with Cinnamon with the Cinnamenu menu (instead of the default ugly one). I’m able to make Mint to start up at 700 MB of RAM. On my fast desktop I have Debian Testing with Gnome 47, that one starts at 1.5 GB of RAM. I’m thinking of using Mint there too.

  • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    KDE.

    I won’t use gnome (I’ve mentioned elsewhere), and unsurprisingly I just dont like it either. The design choices are restrictive, the environment is oversimplified - its just not for me.

    Ive used lots of DEs over the years, even fvwm95 (the original, its neat that some folks have updated it though), and at this point if its a desktop its getting KDE.