Let’s face it, the dems don’t care about the commoners, the republicans are actually pure evil, everyone was happy when that shitstain CEO got shot.

Maybe we should build on this momentum we have to drive actual change at the political level.

my first act as president in 2029 would be to issue a full and unconditional pardon of the billionaire killer.

edit:

well alrighty then, followup question, does anyone want to join my newly formed political party? I’m going to start working on drafting our mission statement, or manifesto or whatever it should be called.

Further Edit: I set up a lemmy community for us to post shit about it. If you want to join, that’s our official, unofficial space. https://lemmy.world/c/newpoliticalparty

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Third parties don’t and can’t work. The system is rigged for that. Better to start an anti-ceo PAC.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    To everyone bringing up FPTP, other countries manage to not have it, it can be done, so stop fighting so hard against efforts to doing away with it.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 days ago

    Until we have a voting system where 3rd parties are viable (for example. Ranked Choice Voting, Star Voting, Approval Voting, etc.), we absolutely do not benefit in any way for the existence of more parties.

    Whether intentional or not, America today is a two-party system by design. If you want more choices beyond the Democrats and Republicans, you need to help us enact voting system reforms which are necessary to allow 3rd parties to exist legitimately. We aren’t joking when we say that voting 3rd party is throwing your vote away; it very much is.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    First past the post is what you’re tangling with.

    Https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

    It makes it so third parties only hurt their closest friend and lose to their least favorite party. Taking that energy into the democratic party itself is probably the best bet. Not good, but best.

    In ranked choice, yes a new party would probably be best.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Since criminals can be president now, I think Joe Exotic should be president. Make America exotic again!

    People don’t want to empower the workers and take away money and power from billionaires. Bernie Sanders already tried this but it’s not how America works and what Americans want.

    With the current system, every new party will take away votes from the party it’s closest to. This ensures more voting percentage for the opponents. So when you create a socialist party, most of the votes you will get will be from democrats who won’t vote for the democratic party, so it’s easier for the Republicans to win. You just helped the opposite side.

    Maybe when you create a party close to the Republicans you can steal their voters so the democrats have a higher chance of winning. Maybe do the same within the democrats to scatter their votes in a way so Bernie will get the majority.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I don’t think we’re going to gain any traction until we override Citizens United and make bribing public officials illegal again. That would allow us to take back the legislative process and begin passing bills that the super rich are not going to like.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Unfortunately, the only real path out of this at this point is violent revolution. We tried everything else. For decades. Pleaded with them to listen. They arrested and murdered us. Brainwashed the average person using sophisticated psychological conditioning. Captured every branch of government and agency.

        Tell me another way. I am begging you. But I’ve been looking for years and I have hit a wall. We are out of time.

        They chose this.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    Wouldn’t it be better to join a party that already has shitting on the rich as part of its mission? I mean the two big parties don’t have that, but some of the small ones do AFAIK.

    • problematicPanther@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      that’s the thing, i can’t think of any. the communist party of america is very much just full of tankies circle jerking about how ccp and north korea actually good, the green party is all about spoiling the dems and never actually do anything, the libertarians are fundamentally opposed to my political views. the only political party i can think of would be the bull moose party, but afaik they went extinct after teddy roosevelt.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    doesnt have to be just one, have many. doesnt even have to be tons of people, just 2 trying to actively do things is something.

  • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    We need electoral reform that implements a system where more than two parties becomes viable. Imagine splitting left-leaning voters even more than they are now. It’s guaranteed wins for Republicans.

    First Past the Post must be done away with and there should instead be a coalition of voters that refuse to support ANY candidate that doesn’t make it their primary campaign policy. Once that’s done, smaller parties will organically be created and incorporated into the system.

    Support organizations listed here, specifically FairVote.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Then do STAR, or approval. Those are simple. And I think even more likely to allow 3rd parties.

        Pretty much anything is better than FPTP.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Personally, I think a 2 round system is the best bet.

          Or a non-partisan blanket primary with top 2 going into a 1vs1 general election.

          Both are similar, with the goal of eliminating the spoiler effect, and its easy to understand, since we are still choosing one name, but with 2 rounds of elections instead.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            Those don’t eliminate the spoiler effect, but it does end up looking different. (Maybe has a different name in this form?)

            My blue state has a blanket primary, and this last election I saw that demonstrated:

            One race had two Republicans and like half a dozen Democrats and another half a dozen in other parties. The Republican vote of course was split between the two candidates. The Democrat vote was split like a hydra and we very nearly had (few hundred votes away) the two Republicans go to the general!

            Fortunately, the top Dem barely squeaked into second place, and then easily won the general, but it was mighty close.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Based on how the public reacted to a dead parasite there is clearly demand for the alternative to current clown regime.

    The Adjuster’s hard work last week really highlighted that people are tired and ready for a change.

    He has done more to galvanize the public than anyone during my life time.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s not going to amount to anything if he’s the only one taking action. If we’ve all just been waiting for things to get started then where is everyone now? I’ve seen tons of “I’ve got my pitchfork ready for when things get started” posts over the last few years but now that it’s supposedly here I only see the one pitchfork.

      Obviously I’m not doing anything either but the question I’m getting at is, is it fair to say the public has been galvanized if it’s just one guy doing one thing while a bunch of people watch?

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        At least everyone can agree that we support him… So that’s a step in the right direction.

        I am not sure what will come of it but shit posting in his support has to be rattling the owner class.

        So there is sone benefit there too.

        Bigger picture is that we need politicians to do something but they won’t

        It seems they don’t care to do anything for iseven if we vote for them.