• jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I was for a while. Hosted a LOT of stuff on an i5-4690K overclocked to hell and back. It did its job great until I replaced it.

    Now my servers don’t lag anymore.

    EDIT: CPU usage was almost always at max. I was just redlining that thing for ~3 years. Cooling was a beefy Noctua air cooler so it stayed at ~60 C. An absolute power house.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    your hardware ain’t shit until it’s a first gen core2duo in a random Dell office PC and 2gb of memory that you specifically only use just because it’s a cheaper way to get x86 when you can’t use your raspberry pi.

    Also they lie most of the time and it may technically run fine on more memory, especially if it’s older when dimm capacities were a lot lower than they can be now. It just won’t be “supported”.

  • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I used to selfhost on a core 2 duo thinkpad R60i. It had a broken fan so I had to hide it into a storage room otherwise it would wake up people from sleep during the night making weird noises. It was pretty damn slow. Even opening proxmox UI in the remotely took time. KrISS feed worked pretty well tho.

    I have since upgraded to… well, nothing. The fan is KO now and the laptop won’t boot. It’s a shame because not having access to radicale is making my life more difficult than it should be. I use CalDAV from disroot.org but it would be nice to share a calendar with my family too.

  • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    4 gigs of RAM is enough to host many singular projects - your own backup server or VPN for instance. It’s only if you want to do many things simultaneously that things get slow.

    • arglebargle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It is amazing what you can do with so little. My server has nas, jellyfin, plex, ebook reader, recipe, vpn, notes, music server, backups, and serves 4 people. If it hits 4gb ram usage it is a rare day.

  • robalees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    2012 Mac Mini with a fucked NIC because I man handled it putting in a SSD. Those things are tight inside!

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lol, I used to have an 08 Mac mini and that required a razor blade and putty knives to open. I got pretty good at it after separately upgrading the RAM adding an SSD and swapping out the cpu for the most powerful option that Apple didn’t even offer

          • robalees@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            When I used to work at the “Fruit Stand” I never had to repair those white back Mini’s thankfully, but I do remember the putty knives being around. The unibody iMac was the worse, had to pizza cutter the whole LCD off the frame to replace anything, then glue it back on!

            • Cort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Lol by the time I actually needed to upgrade from that mini, all the fruit stand stuff wasn’t really upgradable anymore. It was really frustrating, so I jumped ship to Windows.

              Those iMac screens seemed so fiddley to remove just to get access to the drives. Why won’t they just bolt them in instead of using glue! (I know why, but I still don’t like it)

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some old netbook I guess, or unsupported hardware and a driver default. If all you need is ssh, the display resolution hardly matters.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, just never saw this numbers for resolution, ever 😆

          • kalleboo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Most 720p TVs (“HD Ready”) used to be that resolution since they re-used production lines from 1024x768 displays

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ahh, I see, they took the 4:3 Standard screen and let it grow to 16:9, that makes a lot of sense 😃

              I am to young for knowing 4:3 resolutions 😆

      • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        This was common in budget laptops 10 years ago. I had a Asus laptop with the same resolution and I have seen others with this resolution as well

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          😆nice

          I just learned that this resolution resulted from 4:3 screens which got some wideness added to reach 16:9 from an awesome person in this comment thread 😊

          • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I had to check the post not logged in, weirdly I only see your comment when I’m logged in, but yeah, I (almost) only ever ssh into it, so I never really noticed the resolution until you pointed it out

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Which doesn’t sound like much, but if you have applications designed for 1024x768 (which was pretty much the standard PC resolution for years) then at least it would fit on the screen.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Plex server is running on my old Threadripper 1950X. Thing has been a champ. Due to rebuild it since I’ve got newer hardware to cycle into it but been dragging my heels on it. Not looking forward to it.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Isn’t ryzen not recommended for transcoding? Plus, I’ve read that power efficiency isn’t great. Mostly regarding idle power consumption.

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ryzen is not recommended for transcoding because the Radeon integrated GPU’s encoding accelerator is not as fast as in intel iGPUs. But this does not come into play if you A) have 16 cores and B) don’t even have an integrated GPU.

        And about idle power consumption: I don’t think it’s a point of interest if you are using a workstation class computer.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think it’s a point of a interest for any hw running 24/7 but you do you.

          Regarding transcoding, are you saying you’re not even doing it? If you are, doing it with your cpu is far more inefficient than using a gpu. But again, different strokes I guess.

          • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Dunno whether they are transcoding or not nor why they have such a bizarre setup. But I would hope 16C/32T CPU from 2017 could handle software transcoding. Also peak power consumption while playing a movie does not really matter compared to idle power consumption. What matters more is that the motherboard is probably packed with pcie slots that consume a lot of power. But to OP it probably does not matter if they use a threadripper.

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I would hope 16C/32T CPU from 2017 could handle software transcoding

              I didn’t say it couldn’t handle it. Just that it was very inefficient.

              peak power consumption while playing a movie does not really matter compared to idle power consumption

              I mentioned both things. Did you actually read my comments?

  • evidences@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    My NAS is on an embedded Xeon that at this point is close to a decade old and one of my proxmox boxes is on an Intel 6500t. I’m not really running anything on any really low spec machines anymore, though earlyish in the pandemic I was running boinc with the Open Pandemics project on 4 raspberry pis.

  • 31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oldest I got is limited to 16GB (excluding rPis). My main desktop is limited to 32GB which is annoying, because I sometimes need more. But, I have a home server with 128GB of RAM that I can use when it’s not doing other stuff. I once needed more than 128GB of RAM (to run optimizations on a large ONNX model, iirc), so had to spin up an EC2 instance with 512GB of RAM.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not absolutely shit, it’s a Thinkpad t440s with an i7 and 8gigs of RAM and a completely broken trackpad that I ordered to use as a PC when my desktop wasn’t working in 2018. Started with a bare server OS then quickly realized the value of virtualization and deployed Proxmox on it in 2019. Have been using it as a modest little server ever since. But I realize it’s now 10 years old. And it might be my server for another 5 years, or more if it can manage it.

    In the host OS I tweaked some value to ensure the battery never charges over 80%. And while I don’t know exactly how much electricity it consumes on idle, I believe it’s not too much. Works great for what I want. The most significant issue is some error message that I can’t remember the text of that would pop up, I think related to the NIC. I guess Linux and the NIC in this laptop have/had some kind of mutual misunderstanding.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, absolutely. Same here, I find used laptops often make GREAT homelab systems, and ones with broken screens/mice/keyboards can be even better since you can get them CHEAP and still fully use them.

      I have 4 doing various things including one acting as my “desktop” down in the homelab. But they’re between 4 and 14 years old and do a great job for what they’re used for.

      • Andres Salomon@social.ridetrans.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        @ripcord @GnuLinuxDude The lifecycle of my laptops:

        - years 1-5: I use them.

        - years 5-10: my kids use them (generally beating the crap out of them, covering them in boogers/popsicle juice, dropping them, etc).

        - years 10-15: low-power selfhosted server which tucks away nicely, and has its own screen so that when something breaks I don’t need to dig up an hdmi cable and monitor.

        EDIT: because the OP asks for hardware: my current backup & torrent machine is a 4th gen i3 latitude e7240.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sure a lot of people’s self hosting journey started on junk hardware… “try it out”, followed by “oh this is cool” followed by “omg I could do this, that and that” followed by dumping that hand-me-down garbage hardware you were using for something new and shiny specifically for the server.

    My unRAID journey was this exactly. I now have a 12 hot/swap bay rack mounted case, with a Ryzan 9 multi core, ECC ram, but it started out with my ‘old’ PC with a few old/small HDDs

  • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I run a local LLM on my gaming computer thats like a decade old now with an old 1070ti 8GB VRAM card. It does a good job running mistral small 22B at 3t/s which I think is pretty good. But any tech enthusiast into LLMs look at those numbers and probably wonder how I can stand such a slow token speed. I look at their multi card data center racks with 5x 4090s and wonder how the hell they can afford it.

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m hosting a minio cluster on my brother-in-law’s old gaming computer he spent $5k on in 2012 and 3 five year old mini-pcs with 1tb external drives plugged into them. Works fine.

  • SolaceFiend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m still interested in Self-Hosting but I actually tried getting into self-hosting a year or so ago. I bought a s***** desktop computer from Walmart, and installed window server 2020 on it to try to practice on that.

    Thought I could use it to put some bullet points on my resume, and maybe get into self hosting later with next cloud. I ended up not fully following through because I felt like I needed to first buy new editions of the server administration and network infrastructure textbooks I had learned from a decade prior, before I could continue with giving it an FQDN, setting it up as a primary DNS Server, or pointing it at one, and etc.

    So it was only accessible on my LAN, because I was afraid of making it a remotely accessible server unless I knew I had good firewall rules, and had set up the primary DNS server correctly, and ultimately just never finished setting it up. The most ever accomplished was getting it working as a file server for personal storage, and creating local accounts with usernames and passwords for both myself and my mom, whom I was living with at the time. It could authenticate remote access through our local Wi-Fi, but I never got further.

    • PeaceFrog@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Hard to understad why it was difficult. For some reason windows admins are afraid of experimenting, breaking things. Practically I became sys admin by drinking beer and playing with linux, containers, etc.