Summary
Vice President JD Vance claimed that Donald Trump’s policies will lower grocery prices, but he failed to provide details.
Instead, Vance emphasized vague goals like increasing capital investment and job creation.
Meanwhile, Trump’s recent tariff threats, including a 25% increase on Colombian coffee imports, have driven coffee prices higher, exacerbating grocery costs.
Critics note Trump’s shifting narrative, as he now admits it is “hard to bring things down once they’re up.”
Supporters, however, downplayed price hikes, suggesting cheaper alternatives like instant coffee.
Nothing will be done to help regular people. All the talk is cover for the grifting and destruction.
Same as their healthcare plan.
Listen, I’ve heard from a very reliable source that there is a concept for a plan.
There’s only one way to lower prices. Extremely aggressive government action that will never happen, especially under a Trump adminstration.
First, they would have to hold Congressional hearings and drag the CEOs of these large corporations in front of the House to explain why their profit margins are going up far faster than normal inflation pressures should dictate, and why this trend started during the COVID pandemic. Let these CEOs try to explain away the price gouging and the profiteering. Hold CEOs in contempt if they refuse to answer or give one of those meaningless word salads of buzzwords meant to say a whole lot of nothing, and actually start jailing these bastards for 30 days for trying to tiptoe around it.
Tax profit margins that are above 2019 levels for the industry at 100%. If the average profit margin for the industry in 2019 was 5% and your company suddenly has a 10% margin in 2024, then tax that additional 5% at a 100% tax rate. Make price gouging both illegal and pointless since the government would just take it all anyway.
When CEOs start having to make regular trips to Washington to explain why their profits keep skyrocketing and the government comes in to take all that excess profit anyway, and watch prices come back down.
This, but retroactively as well.
How does it differ from democrats’ plan to lower food prices?
Step 0. Inflation came back down to almost normal. Prices should no longer be increasing ass quickly
Step 1. Stabilize trade
Step ?: investigate price gouging
Step ?: explain the temporary impact of avian flu on poultry related products
Step 0. Inflation came back down to almost normal. Prices should no longer be increasing ass quickly
Your increase in suffering has slowed. Why aren’t you happy?
So, even if you stop there and ignore everything else:
- do you vote for “your increase in suffering has slowed” or “these policies will speed up your increase in suffering”?
- or are they both the same?
do you vote for “your increase in suffering has slowed” or “these policies will speed up your increase in suffering”?
I voted for Harris. Her messaging was still dogshit on this issue. She was acting like the problem was fixed when it wasn’t.
I voted for Harris
Ahhh. So you too- support genocide.
Oh cool. I have a stalker. I thought I left this sort of unhinged shit behind when I left reddit.
So, let me explain something to you as I’ve seen you accuse people of this a lot and I think maybe you’re having a little trouble understanding how things work:
If someone interacts with you in the comments of a post, and then respond to you in that same post later or… even in a different comment section in a different post altogether….
That’s not stalking. That’s just interacting with people in a social media setting. And considering how often you post your rage-induced genocide accusations, if we go by your interpretation of the word, you’d have to pretty much accuse the entirely of lemmy of stalking.
Democrats had a plan
Harris’ plan was to ban price gourging which would put a cap on the price.
Trump doesn’t have a plan to lower food prices.
That’s the difference.
Here’s the thing… As wishful thinking as this sounds… You and I both know this would have instantly been appealed by every major food manufacturer in the entire country and the SCOTUS would overturn it because it defeats the “free enterprise ideals” of capitalism.
Well for a start Democrats weren’t planning to turbocharge inflation by putting tariffs on everything. So already their plan was better.
You mean the man who said he had concepts of a plan didn’t have a plan? Color me shocked.
He once smelled someone’s seat who had the concept of a plan. That must count for something
The plan is to let prices go up (predictably, given tariffs) while forever promising people that prices will come down soon. I’m sure it will happen right after the wealth Reagan promised finally trickles down.
Meanwhile they will keep finding and making enemies to blame the high prices on.
Ah, like Infrastructure Week 2.0
Ah, like the beautiful Healthcare Plan
Apparently the concept of his healthcare plan involves just… turning off Medicare, without warning.
The actual Trickle Down economy: Getting drenched in a golden shower while waiting for your millions
Fun fact: “trickle down economics” is just rebranded horse and sparrow economics. The idea being that if you overfeed your horse, it won’t digest it all and the sparrow will be able to sift through the horse shit to find bits of food to eat.
I don’t think we get the luxury of it being golden with diaper don.
Oh hey, that’s his plan for healthcare costs too.
Funny enough, not his plan for how to resolve issues with minorities wanting rights
Executive orders don’t work for things like reigning in corporate greed. They work for everything else. But helping a large portion of the nations backbone? Can’t do it. Won’t even try.
-DJT (probably)
So… wait. A conservative laid out a rug, somehow got themselves elected, and then…. pulled it? As a big fan of rugs, I must say that I am very upset by this.
We told you so.
The republican plan is to lie and get elected so they can rape the nation. They don’t care about citizens. They are here to make money and take yours.
Conservatism is an oil drill trying to drill entire countries.
“The way that you lower prices is that you encourage more capital investment into our country,” Vance added.
This clown hasn’t a clue how the economy works.
He knows a lot better than the clowns that voted him in. Lowering prices would mean deflation and that’s pretty much universally seen as a bad thing. The best you can do is increase wages. Of which the GOP will do nothing about.
It’s all gonna trickle down any day now, right?
There are only 3 ways to lower(that came to my mind) prices in a quick way.
1: Abandon regulations. If corporations don’t have to invest into safety, ecology and such stuff they have lower production costs which can mean lower prices.
2: More competition. If corporations have to compete with each other they usually start a battle over who gets the best quality for the lowest price.
3: Subsidies. Nothing to say here I guess.
Edit: Point one and three lower production costs. As others have already pointed out, these dont mean lower prices, but more profit for companys
Secret option 4: general strike. Pay us more, charge less, or we’ll eat the wealthy before we go hungry.
May 1st. 2028. We all walk out together.
1: Abandon regulations. If corporations don’t have to invest into safety, ecology and such stuff they have lower production costs which can mean lower prices.
I think corporations have pretty clearly demonstrated an unwillingness to pass savings in their production chain on to the consumer. For example, very few items have gone back down to their pre-pandemic price point, even though scarcity and supply chain issues from COVID have largely resolved.
- Reduce trade barriers, like tariffs
Corporations don’t willingly give up money. In circumstances like 1 and 3 they’ll more likely just say “thanks for making line go up more” lol. COVID imposed some supply issues that I would assume are mostly mitigated by now, but I haven’t seen costs decrease, only increase–so now we have record profits in many contexts. Subsidies can sometimes help, but it seems to me that the most effective subsidies (in terms of lowering cost) are those with significant, more powerful corporate players downstream (e.g., corn in the US) rather than those purchased by individual consumers who have comparatively little power.
I don’t know that 2 is necessarily quick, but competition can indeed lower prices if a competitor can actually survive against the behemoths in their respective markets. In those instances, corporations can try to shape regulation to squash the upstarts while leaving the big players alone.
I’m not sure that government really has the ability to lower prices in a way that isn’t somehow perverted by large corporate entities given the power they have.
Youre right. I forgot that companies will likely not lower the prices.
4 - Reduce Profit Margin.
Corporate has dispatched a kill team to your location.
Nationalize the companies involved in production and distribution and eliminate profit, making and selling everything at-cost also works.
There’s too much evidence all over the world that point 1 would never work. If deregulation relieve then from certain costs, they’ll happily enjoy higher profits. 🤷
Eggs… Now coffee… TIL conservatives hate breakfast.
Columbia’s biggest export to the U.S. is crude oil. So oil prices higher from Canada, this would have been higher oil prices from Columbia… But I believe he didn’t do the tarrifs. Guys a dumbass
Well, we’re only 8 days in. Still plenty of time for him to tariff all of our tits off.
It’s because those gays run bed and breakfasts, up next on the docket for conservatives are beds.
Yeah, these zellenials spending all their time eating avocado taquitos on their memory foam mattresses are destroying the economy. In my day, we slept on asbestos and mouse poop mats and we liked it.
Trump should tax the chickens and deport the ones who don’t produce eggs. That’ll scare the others to ramp up production. Trickle down theory for the win. /s
“Supporters, however, downplayed price hikes, suggesting cheaper alternatives like instant coffee.”
Almost like it was never about egg prices at all for alot of them
It was about instant coffee?
Sooner or later everyone is going to have to accept these are the new regular prices.
