• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Tech =/= megacorps

    That’s like saying food doesn’t make the world better where you mean food industry megacorps producing hunger & poverty.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m tired of people seeing everything as binary good or bad. We have more than two brain cells, and life isn’t a fucking meme.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    God, same. I’m to the point where I don’t even want a phone at all anymore. I’m so tired of just… everything.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tech was ruined in the 90s when capitalistic influences (microsoft being the dominant force but far from the only one) propagandized the industry and eventually populace at large with the idea that competition in the industry is what drives innovation.

    Granted, much of their work was already done for them thanks to western influence perpetuating this ideal for ages. But when the frameworks for open standards, interoperability, and collaborative development were being proposed and put into place they were shot down and/or actively sabotaged

    As a result 40 years later we have this mess. A landscape filled with nightmare tech. Fragmentation everywhere, design heavily influenced by a small handful of sociopaths with no empathy and active disdain for users, the idea of open standards is something that requires government intervention (and still rarely occurs), interoperability is something that has to be hacked around and frequently breaks as a means to encourage purchasing a competing product.

    What could have been. Tech designed for people’s needs rather than tech designed to extract income

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Tech isn’t the problem. It’s the people in charge of it. It’s the capitalism/neo-feudalism controlling the politics.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Exactly. I would extend that and the article’s premise to say, tech isn’t innately good or bad, it is just a tool that can be applied in good or bad ways. For example at his cafe, a QR code ordering system could have been optional for those who prefer it, and could be easily implemented without collecting any personal data. And that could actually be a positive thing for those who want to reorder without getting up or who have social anxiety. But by forcing all customers into this confusing and privacy invading system, the tech becomes a bad thing.

      The villain of that story is not tech. The villains are the online ordering company that decided to make a data grab, and the cafe owner who decided to buy tech so he wouldn’t have to pay servers.

  • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Author is one step away from the realization that Capitalism is the culprit, and technology is just the vector.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Technology has never been the problem: there’s nothing wrong with genetic engineering, AI, etc. They can (and have) been used for good.

      The problem has always been the “greed is good” sociopaths using it for evil.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    For the past 20 years, tech has promised to make things more efficient while making almost everything more complicated and less meaningful. Innovation, for innovation’s sake, has eroded our craftsmanship, relationships, and ability to think critically.

    I feel this in my bones.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For many things I completely agree.

      That said, we just had our second kid, and neither set of grandparents live locally. That we can video chat with our family — for free, essentially! — is astonishing. And it’s not a big deal, not something we plan, just, “hey let’s say hi to Gramma and Gramps!”

      When I was a kid, videoconferencing was exclusive to seriously high end offices. And when we wanted to make a long distance phone call, we’d sometimes plan it in advance and buy prepaid minutes (this was on a landline, mid 90s maybe). Now my mom can just chat with her friend “across the pond” whenever she wants, from the comfort of her couch, and for zero incremental cost.

      I think technology that “feels like tech” is oftentimes a time sink and a waste. But the tech we take for granted? There’s some pretty amazing stuff there.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        for free, essentially!

        Say that to the Facebook Portal: a fantastic product five years ago that is now having its features gutted because Meta couldn’t figure out how to make money off of it.

      • lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There’s magic and then there’s complexity in tech (at least this is how I think about it).

        Video calling, pure magic, simple to use with major benefits.

        Complex business management software that requires a degree to use? Complexity almost for complexity’s sake to lock an organisation into a support contract.

        Web stores? Usually magic, especially with refined payment processing and smooth ordering. Can verge into over complex coughAmazoncough.

        Internal network administration (Active Directory) and cloud tech, often complexity for complexity’s sake again.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Tech tends to goes through stages:

        A need or idea is created. Usually by a small independent entity.

        A proof of concept is developed and starts to gain ground.

        Investors pour money into the concept to an extreme degree. Tech grows in functionality, matures and develops into a useful tool.

        The the investors demand a return on the investment and the money dries up.

        Company either goes bankrupt or their product goes to shit.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re conflating tech with tech bros.

      Tech can and does make lots of things that make our lives longer and better. Just not most of the consumer level shit that is constantly peddled by snake oil sellers. That tech is not meant to make your lives easier, it’s meant to get more money out of you without giving it up to the little people at service level.

      The problem isn’t the tech, it’s the people who are controlling the tech.

      • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The problem isn’t the tech, it’s the people who are controlling the tech.

        The tech is literally made by those by people. The tech itself is in fact the problem. You will never have a version of something like social media that’s actually healthy. One way or the other someone with power will get their hands on it and abuse it.

    • htrayl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tech has made things more efficient - the rewards of such are simply being funneled from the average person to the wealthy.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe some tech has increased efficiency (although, when it does that increase is more often than not temporary and short lived), but there is even more “tech” that swarms that space rent seeking any time, money, or other resource saved by that increased efficiency. After the efficiencies degrade, the tech-as-a-scam persists and you end up with less efficient systems than you started with.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, just watch what AI does. The generation after Gen Alpha is going to be unable to imagine the concept of being self sustaining, and problem solving without machines. The same way Gen Z today can’t imagine the concept of just NOT having internet. Or any internet connected devices.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, just print it and stick it on the table. Or have a tablet or something at the table if it changes frequently.

        Don’t make me use my phone to look up your menu, that’s just tacky.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “In some parts of the city, you can’t even park your car anymore without downloading an app.”

    Omg, this. I left my phone at home by accident and quickly found out that I could not pay a meter on the area I went to … You had to download an app to pay or use you phone to register a phone number and manually enter a plate and credit card.

    No phone…meant no parking.

    Good luck too if your phone happens to run out of battery.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yet more benefits to cycling then. Just lock it to any reasonably sturdy object.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah but parking has always been bad.

      You had to carry change. Meters were always out of order or would just eat your change without issuing a ticket, and the people checking never gave a shit and would give you a fine anyway.

      My only complaint is the app, everyone should offer a website or an app, but if you’re going to park there a few times an app does make sense.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Neither a phone nor website would work if your phone battery is flat. The meter should at least have a way for someone to park their car if they don’t have a functioning phone, or internet access, even before the hellscape of needing a separate app for everything.

        • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re in a car. There’s probably a charging port there. Sucks if you don’t have a phone, but it sucked before when you didn’t have change.

          Parking has always been a privilege not a right, and if you’re not prepared you’re going to get a ticket.

          I get that it’s annoying but if my phone broke and I suddenly had to pay for parking with coins, I don’t know what I’d do either. Everything is cashless now, where would I get coins from?

          • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Woo! Let’s make this artificial biome that much more inhospitable for the very creatures that build and live in it!

            We must imagine Sisyphus fucking miserable! Ants in an anthill made of broken glass and depleted lion batteries!

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Times change. I see nothing wrong with it. Same as you used to be able to park without paying, then you started to pay, and now it’s moving from those machines to phone apps. And in the future there may be other form of pay, or maybe parking is directly forbidden o who knows what but there will be a change, for sure. Because things change.

      It’s just nostalgia working. Things change. You were more capable of dealing with change at a younger age and that’s why you see the older the people get the more they complain about everything.

      But is just a change, like many other that came before that.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some parts of life have gotten massively easier. The other day I called my pharmacy to delay my next prescription refill because I still have pills. I was able to do this entirely through voice interaction with an automated system. Huzzah. I get texts when my scrips are about to be filled or ready, and reminders if I don’t pick them up for a while. I can also see this info on demand in an app if I want. What’s not to like?

    My entire medical group runs on an app now. I can make appointments with my doctor, see the documentation from prior visits, pay bills, see test results…

    Oh but boo hoo this author had to download an app to order a drink. First world problems…

  • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I work in a coffee shop; I already feel sufficiently dehumanized by the amount of people who answer my “how are you today?” with “cappuccino to-go”. I would hate to work in a café where you order via your phone.

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly? Cool that you are asking, but I just want a coffee, not a conversation.

      Yes, I’m German, how could you tell?

      • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can just answer “fine” and I’ll be satisfied though, it’s really easy to sus out who wants to chat up their barista and who just wants to go in, order, get out. I’m not seeking to force anyone into a conversation they don’t want, I just want a faint acknowledgment of my humanity, you know?

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel the same. Find it annoying when in the US the waitress introduces herself, asks where I’m form, etc. Do you work for a diner or the CIA? Just bring me a steak with fries, medium rare, please and thank you.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not everyone wants to socially interact. That’s something to respect.

      I tend to prioritize not-human services, as social interaction exhaust me.

      When I used to work with customers I really didn’t like when people starting talking about unnecessary staff. The less I had to interact the better for me.

      • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I get that and totally respect it, and I never pursue further conversation unless I get a chatty vibe from the customer.

        However it’s insanely rude to ignore me to my face after I’ve just asked you a question. If someone answers “Fine. Cappuccino to-go.” that’s really all I’m asking for. I’m not simply an interface through which you get coffee, I’m a human person, and I think customer service staff deserve to be treated as such.

  • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tech is a tool. It can be benefitting the oligarchs and restrictive, or benefitting society and open source.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      People weren’t willing to pay with money. Usually every tech product with ads has an “insert coin to remove” option. If you don’t insert coin, advertisers will.

      • Tamo240@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Paying for the product and paying to not be inconvenienced by ads have become separate things. The first is standard business, the second is extortion.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Paying 80 for a product that is worth 100 and have ads is standard practice nowadays, to the point that not doing this puts you in competitive disadvantage. You are than asked to pay the remaining 20 or put up with ads.

          You see this in every lemmy discussion about smart TVs. People complain that TVs have ads and there’s always someone that suggest getting a “dumb” TV but complain that they are more expensive. It’s almost like ads subsidize the purchase price or something…

          • Tamo240@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I disagree, I think the removal of ads is often painted as a benefit that had inherent value. Look at YouTube premium or Prime video. Both haven’t actually improved their offering, just made it worse by introducing ads and insisting users that don’t want to see ads have to pay for the privilege of not being advertised to.

            This means the total price adds up to higher than 100% of the product value, because it’s a ‘premium’ version that comes without advertisement inconvenience.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Prime video I don’t know so well, but YouTube was free without ads in the beginning, for something that is incredibly expensive to run. They had to introduce any monetization or shut down the service. They went with ads because 99% of users prefer that to payment. Later they gave the option to pay to remove the ads, only as an extra, because very few people are ready to do that.

              There are some ad-free video platforms out there but they have a tiny fraction of the user base of YouTube. Most people couldn’t even name one, let alone considering using it, when YouTube is “free”.

  • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m tired of the people who are the ones that have taken tech to the direction it has gone in for a long while now. Making up problems that weren’t ever there before that suddenly now need a stupid app or a feature to fix but adds in its own problems.

    I’m tired of big tech deciding when we should upgrade because they deliberately create things that break, degrade and becomes obsolete far shorter than whatever should have.

    I’m tired of unnecessary things like added fees for ‘convenience’. I’m tired of things like fucking google flipping back accounts on me when I need to see a number to another account.

    So much shit is that I’m tired about with tech. Tech is supposed to be exciting, easier, friendlier. Now it’s just manipulated into a problem of its own, simply because of those who are behind it.

    • Darren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m tired of big tech deciding when we should upgrade because they deliberately create things that break, degrade and becomes obsolete far shorter than whatever should have.

      I think about Apple quite a lot in this regard. Not because of planned obsolescence or anything so nefarious, but because they genuinely make some of the best consumer hardware you can buy, and because it’s so good it costs a decent wedge. Then, five years later, when that good hardware is still as good as the day you bought it, they quietly drop OS support for it because they need you to buy another one.

      And most people will smile and thank them for the trade-in discount they’ll get to help them spend more money, while that older, still perfectly usable hardware is shipped off to a massive shredder to take it off the used market.

      I use Macs, I understand this process very well. But I’ve also done my fair share of putting OCLP on older hardware in order to wring a few more years out of it, and of putting Linux on even older Macs because they still work perfectly well. I mean, I have a 2011 MacBook Pro that’s running Linux Mint so well that you wouldn’t have any idea that it’s a 14 year old laptop.

      The second best thing Apple are good at is convincing their customers that the equipment they own is old and knackered. And that’s kinda sad.