• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Thing I like about the No Kings protests is that they actually get the word out in advance.

    Usually if there’s a protest, I don’t hear about it until the morning of or the day after.

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I already know ours is going to be awesome, and it’s going to tie into our Pride that day, which is happening just a few blocks away - they’ll all become the last float in the parade as they march. YES

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Sorry to be super off-topic, but I’m relatively new to Lemmy and I can’t figure out why it says there are 47 comments on this post, 26 of which are new, but I only see 3.

  • zrst@lemmy.cif.su
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why was it called “no kings”? That always struck me a stupid name created by people who probably voted for hillary/biden in their primaries.

    We should be saying “no rulers” or “no oligarchs.”

    As usual, neo-libs miss the mark because they can’t comprehend how their politicians are also part of the problem.

    • bystander@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      This is a lesson on marketing. “No Kings” rolls off the tongue. Monarchy invokes autocracy/dictatorship, it’s an easy transition into connecting that it’s the opposite of democracy.

      “Rulers” kind of include democratically elected ones. “Oligarchs” are too targeted and a big word. And like you said, there are other problems too.

      What’s why “Fake News” and “Make America Great Again” worked so well. Simple and stupid, an elementary schooler can read it. And have enough ambiguity that they can be interpreted however the listener wants to.

      The organization had tried other slogans for their protests, none brought out more people like “No Kings”. Give people what they want I guess.

      • clashorcrashman@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah. I wish we could get these kinda numbers on a more targeted kinda thing, rather than just “orange man bad,” but I guess I’ll take what we can get lol

    • Juice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      At the time it first came out, that was a popular slogan. Its the idea that Trump wants to make himself king of the U.S.A., so its an anti-trump and pro democracy slogan.

      Its been a minute since I was active in that space, but I imagine it is the functioning national parts of the 50501 and similar progressive liberal resistance movements that Our Revolution PAC is putting their resources into.

      When I was involved, I wouldn’t have called them neoliberal. The mass current was mostly progressive liberal, with militant radical elements on one side pushing no work with police, recognition of Palestinian genocide; and the other side being quite conservative, sort of “a lot of MAGAs are angry too!” who pushed for depoliticization and police collaboration. There were some genuine socialist radicals fighting on a national level, and winning ground. Also lots of local radicals like PSL and various abolitionist anarchists on the local level fighting for their communities and providing education.

      The character is more like liberal social democrat, if I had to judge the first no kings protest. But things have likely changed since then.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      oddly it was the other way around. “no oligarchs” was something that conservatives dismissed as a liberal thing. So no kings was more to the point and didn’t have liberal connotations.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, libs are the problem that “no kings” protests against! Thanks, Obama

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    Show up be organized let everybody hear and see us! If you can’t attend post about it spread the word we will not just sit by and watch these monsters take everything from us!

  • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you’re not showing up prepared to get arrested, you’re just doing a parade.

    I’m sure this will give everyone a nice chance to pat themselves on the back for pretending to do something, though.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I mean, they kind of have a point.

      If you’re not showing up prepared to get arrested to fight, you’re just doing a parade.

      There, FTFY.

      Do you really mean it when you say you don’t want no king in the USA? Because that’s what Trump is acting like.

    • weastie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      What a stupid comment. Just showing up to a protest is far more than most people do. Do you think the No Kings protest would have had so much coverage if only 100 people went to it?

      • Raoul Duke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was helping organize a lot of these in my city since February, but honestly nothing of value has changed. We need to take the Malcolm X approach.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My state leaders continue to speak up and do what they can, from representatives to governor to attorney general. Colleges in my state that have been attacked continue to resist. Any attempts at ICE raids are followed by protesters Maybe our protests get ignored by the regime but if it encourages our state politicians to continue acting in our interest, then it makes a difference.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            My state leaders continue to speak up and do what they can, from representatives to governor to attorney general

            Have they, though?

            I mean, I’ve yet to hear about any city ordering their police to arrest any and all federal agents attempting to affect an arrest… I’ve also not heard of any governor activating their national guard forces to defend against the federal invasion…

            These are direct, material things in their power, they refuse to do.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              They seem to disagree that it’s in their power. However local law enforcement is not allowed to assist in any way and state facilities are not allowed to provide detention space. At the very least it slows them down and makes them spend more money to do less

              National guard troops are in a conflict of interest between two masters plus aren’t usually appropriate, plus how does it help anyone to turn that violent?

              My state and several cities are among those who increased their legal budget and have successfully sued over illegal orders. It doesn’t make the headlines but several illegal orders have eventually been halted by courts. Successfully.

              My city councillor was roughed up during an earlier raid by masked thugs, and while there may have been no visible consequences, the raids did stop locally

              My state attorney general is successfully defending doctors from extradition and personal liability for providing reproductive care to women in undeveloped states.

              Harvard is putting its money where its mouth is instead of capitulating like Columbia did. When the regime tried to block foreign student visas, that was successfully invalidated by the courts. Most of the blocked research grants have also been restored.

              This is a variation of T.A.C.O and needs to be more public - the regime may have issued illegal orders and tried to make it so, but backed down when challenged.

        • KatakiY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          A few protests change nothing but it does help organize and network. Many people have no connection to their community and this is that chance

        • ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Protesting is the first step towards change, not the last. Hopefully the movement can gain enough momentum for a general strike or something.

              • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                22
                ·
                2 days ago

                Your lives are already at risk. That you don’t see that makes clear that you are FAR too comfortable.

                • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You would totally be fighting back yourself though - all dirty-Harry like. Man it’s just those lazy people on the TV not doing what you’re shooting at then to do!

                  Too bad you don’t live here though.You’d show them!

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sure.

      Going out to vote is a better idea.

      But then again, republican gerrymandering makes your vote pretty much cast into the void.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Going out to vote is a better idea.

        The master’s house can never be dismantled with the master’s tools.

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I see what you’re about and agree. But there is absolutely nothing you can do to give this crowd the kick in the ass they need. They still wholeheatedly believe they’ll vote out fascism. Something that has happened a grand total of 0 times throughout history. Your time is wasted on these people. Republicans said “The revolution will be bloodless if the left allows it to be”, and these people are giving them everything they ever wanted, by letting it be bloodless, because they can’t fathom how fucking terrifying fascism is.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      would you rather get nothing? because most people aren’t willing to risk their livelihood for this and the first step of action is centralization! get people talking, learn how to help.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      I tend to agree, protesting in blue cities and states is preaching to the choir and achieves nothing. Take that to DC or your closest red state.

      Safe protesting is not protesting.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve been very happy with my blue politicians responses and if this encourages them I’m all for it.

        Not sure what you’re expecting - violence can easily be counter-productive, especially in areas where police are sympathetic

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Oh, no violence, but the people who need to change their opinions aren’t in blue cities or blue states.

          Unhappy with the Feds? Take it to DC and shut DC down for a month. Protesting in LA, SF, Portland, Seattle does nothing as everyone there is already on your side.

          The people who need to see the protests don’t give two shits about what blue cities and states think.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Protesting in blue areas can achieve something, but only if it’s actually disruptive. For example you can force your elected officials to take a hardline approach to Trump rather than capitulate.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Local officials have no power over Trump, and Democratic Congressmen and Senators have no power over Trump due to being in the minority.

          So you’re protesting people who a) agree with you and b) can literally do nothing.

          So, again, protesting in blue cities and states is entirely performative. “At least I did something!”

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            They can obstruct and/or oppose Trump in their own jurisdictions. There are options, everything from withholding federal taxes to enforcing state law on ICE (like Pritzker is threatening to do) to having local National Guard units defend immigrant neighborhoods. In the worst case scenario, forbid ICE from entering the state and shoot them if they do. At the very fucking least this shouldn’t be happening.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I live in a red state, and I plan to be at my local protest. But I take offense to the idea that protests in blue states are somehow too “safe” or not worth the time. The shit that has gone down at protests in Los Angeles should counter that notion pretty handily.

        Honestly, the protests I’ve been to in my red state were way safer than the ones in LA, with way less push back from law enforcement. Probably helps that ICE isn’t operating in my city either.

      • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Says the mod who has no problem shutting down all talk of anything beyond peaceful protesting.

        Just doing your job, lol.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          You are not going to use our platform to organize violence. That isn’t my rule, it’s instance rules.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              shield
              M
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh, no, I personally agree with it and I’d make it a rule if it weren’t already. We aren’t going to be liable for some jack off who wants to burn everything down.

              • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Lemmy (.world) wouldn’t be liable. Lemmy wouldn’t be shut down. Nothing would happen. Also, the idea that a person who wants to fight back against fascism must want to burn everything down is very ignorant. People like you are the problem, people like you are the reason nothing ever gets beyond a “protest.” “Oh no, if we let them have an inch, they’re gonna burn the world down!!!”

                Screw you, Jordan Lund.

                • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                  shield
                  M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  The comments/posts removed were inciting violence and that is 100% not allowed. Don’t like it? Go make your own platform.

                • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Lol, bold words from someone apparently unwilling to host that content themselves.

                  Let’s see: @Illecors@lemmy.cafe – are you fine with users using your instance to organize violence?

              • Mcdolan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Yeah, no one should stick their necks out. Fall in line and everything will be okay.

                • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Oh look another mouthy user who’s happy to put the risk on their admin instead of taking it themselves.

                  Big words.