A good New York Times piece on Portland nevertheless demonstrates how the conventions of objective reporting fail to accurately capture the bad faith driving pro-Trump propaganda.
A good New York Times piece on Portland nevertheless demonstrates how the conventions of objective reporting fail to accurately capture the bad faith driving pro-Trump propaganda.
It’s “in plain sight”, as in, very easily visible.
And no, I’m not calling you an AI. A clanker would have known the difference.
For all intensive purposes, it doesn’t matter. Case and point, I understood fine.
No need to call out a clanker as an escape goat.
Ultimately it’s all a moo point.
Edit: ugh, I see what you’re doing.
its becoming more gobberish by the mole and I am definitely not here for it
FTFY
In “playing” sight isn’t a misheard phrase I’ve encountered before, but that’s a little surprising given how much sense it makes.
Autistic much? It’s a typo. Bravo. Clearly nobody knew what was up. But thank you for the lesson.
Maybe you’re the clanker, lacking in ability to read the context and understand somebody might have made a typo.
…the AI thing is referring to your username.
And what’s wrong with being autistic?
Nothing in particular, it has just led to a pointless and annoying conversation over swype typos.
Awwww. head pats
😭