• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The way the US has been acting, they never seemed to think that democracy is a good form of government, either.

      • FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Lets just say “superpowers and brutal dictatorships”.

        Whoevers dominating in a period in history generally didn’t get there by advocating for peace and self determination.

          • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            People always say this to but I don’t think it’s even true, or misrepresents greatly the situation.

            1. North Korea was the better place to live until the collapse of the USSR and mid-90s famine. That’s not up for debate. Their living standard and quality of life were overall much higher than ROK thanks to Russian subsidies.

            2. North Korea has far less farmland than the ROK, which has many more river valleys and warmer latitudes. North Korea also lacks trading partners due to sanctions, while ROK currently imports around 80 percent of its food.

            3. The US and ROK time their military drills specifically to fuck with DPRK’s planting and harvesting seasons, forcing them to divert manpower to defense positions when they need able-bodied men to be on farms.

            Given these three points, I think North Korean hunger is almost entirely due to the US and its policies. But nobody likes to hear that the Kims might not be horrible monsters