Obama’s comments appear in a new video supporting Gavin Newsom’s Proposition 50 which would allow the California legislature to draw new congressional boundaries ahead of the midterms

Barack Obama has entered the political fray ahead of November’s special election in California, accusing Republicans of attempting to “rig the next election” in a new ad backing Governor Gavin Newsom’s Proposition 50, a ballot measure that could reshape the state’s congressional map.

“Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years,” Obama says in the 30-second ad, urging voters to approve the proposal. “You can stop Republicans in their tracks.”

  • monogram@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Until FPTP becomes Proportional Representation I will assume all current and previous us presidents have/are Rigging The Next Election.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Reading the comments, it seems a lot of people here are totally fine to make good the enemy of perfect and repeat history all over again.

    Enjoy the fascism folks. We’re in it for the long haul it seems.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The US requires a hard reset imo. The US political discourse is heavily biased towards the right causing the ratchet effect and muddies the pool of water of ideas. Liberals and progressives can’t get along because the term socialism in the country has been heavily demonized, that socialists and progressives alike have no choice but to side with the pseudo-left party that is the Democratic Party. The party exploits the lack of choice to be complacent and provide bread crumb policies. Meanwhile, conservatives and the right typically prefer order in spite of differences, so they tend to have stronger voting cohesion to elect the Republican party.

      The US requires a hard reset so that the two party system is rid of and political variety will blossom. Actually popular policies will be enacted and not demonized. Progressives could decouple from the Democratic party and finally call themselves socialists without the taboo. And moderate conservatives could dissociate themselves from the far right. However, this hard reset could mean a lead up to a civil war and the only people who would benefit from this are Russia and China.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No. I’m just now explaining that those who chose not to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Quit trying to make Newsome happen

    It’s really fucking tone deaf to push a Zionist in the face of cratering support for Israel among Democratic voters.

    But then the Democratic party has a history of being tone deaf, like Biden picking Kamala “top cop” Harris for vp during the height of the George Floyd protests.

    Biden won, but these stunts often fail.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If someone isn’t capable of making the easy call to be against genocide, then they absolutely can’t be trusted to be defenders of democracy.

      We gotta quit pretending it’s about this one issue or that one issue. Over and over again we see that there are politicians committed to fighting for what’s right, and there are politicians who aren’t. That’s it. That’s the line. The politicians that sell out to AIPAC are selling out to big tech, to Wall Street, to the military industrial complex, etc.

      • Doorbook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes, Obama, who was okay, bombing people in the middle east, many of which were innocent, doesn’t care about the, innocent people, in the US.

        If they care, they should be in the front line protesting the shit show of the ICE. They are the one that cannot be touch by Trump and his government. He is the one who doesn’t fear losing his life nor does he fear losing his income.

        These people are out of touch, they hope Trump do as much damage so they can get voted in without the need to listen to their voters.

        It is like a divorce kid, where both parents are abuser. One of which doesn’t abuse you as much as knows that the other is worst.

        People and Unions should break this abusive cycle.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’ve been watching republicans do illegal things my entire life. Nobody has ever stopped them

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Some judges have.

      Some people like the ACLU and Marc Elias have.

      Etc.

      Stopped all illegal things they do? No. But many real people have stopped many real things.

  • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    All this astrofurfing and campaigning for Newsom is just a proactive effort to preempt any radical voices from gaining traction from the anti-Trump momentum. That’s the top of their agenda right now, institutional integrity and democracy is at best second.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      this has little to do with campaigning for newsom… it’s about supporting the counter to republican gerrymandering

      you might be right in general, but this is not that context

    • pahlimur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is a great example of “the left” being manipulated to turn on itself. Newsom ain’t great but he is better than anything my former party Republicans put forth. If he makes it through the primaries, please for the love of Satan vote for him in the general. If Republicans win again it’s completely over. If I were still one I’d be completely OK with so many worse things happening. Be more scared of what is yet to come than a groveling centrist like Newsom.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        This is a great example of “the left” being manipulated to turn on itself.

        Yeah, Obama is dividing the left with another power play. People don’t want Newsom for a number of reasons. People want to vote for an actual leader who has principles.

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Vote for him in the general regardless. Why is this so hard? Vote in the primary and show up in the general. Our voting system is so simple.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Nah, that just encourages them to ratfuck progressives. I am not voting for Newsom in the general.

          • Michael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I couldn’t vote for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 primary because of Obama’s power play. Convincing effectively all candidates to drop out and endorse Biden was election interference.

            Our voting system is already rigged and the person warning that Republicans are rigging the next election is responsible, in part.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Newsom, the Zionist guy who likes destroying homeless people’s encampements for PR ain’t “great”. That’s quite an understatement.

      • EldenLord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You both can be right with these seemingly opposed stances. Doesn‘t matter actually, all that matters is that the left is divided and the right isn‘t. That‘s all it takes for evil to win.

        Change that!

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          This is my point reiterated. I don’t like newsom either, but i would vote for him 1x10^100 if he were the candidate in the general. The “he is being normalized” shit is why the left loses all the time. Complain about him, but don’t assume enough centrists wont vote for him in the primaries for him to be the general candidate. I’m tired of people not voting, then bitching about the current administration.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Newsom would be Trump if he lived in Texas. If he is the Democratic nominee in 2028 then I personally am giving up on politics. I’ve been fighting for a better Democratic party for 40 years, and after all that they are worse than the Republicans were when I started. No, fuck that. Newsom would be the last straw for me. If he gets the nomination, there is no saving the country anyways.

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If I see you headed on a train to the camps I’ll make sure go give you a thumbs up while you roll by. Giving up is pathetic. Go dig your grave and don’t complain when they come for you.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Has 40 years of supporting corrupt Democrats saved us from the camps? It sure doesn’t look like it to me. Camps are proceeding right on schedule. That’s the whole point. At best the camps get put on hold for four years. At worst, they get diversity quotas for the guards.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Are you honestly telling me that you expect Newsom would roll back more than some cosmetic fringes of Trump’s immigration policy? Biden sure didn’t. You think Newsom is going to roll back Palentir and the surveillance state? Not a chance in hell.

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          And? Of course they are going to do this shit. Good people don’t rise against great evil, sort of evil people use it to slither into power.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        would have any chance in hell of winning

        …why do you believe that? Kamala was the opposite of radical and lost horribly to Trump.

        If anything, it’s worth trying to run on something progressive or otherwise substantive, since running on status quo policies doesn’t seem to be working.

        • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Kamala was the opposite of radical

          She wasn’t portrayed/perceived that way at all, you understand that right? You and everyone else with some political awareness might think that, but the magats and even a shitload of “centrists” (quotes because most have been captured by the magats without being aware) think she was radical.

          …why do you believe that?

          E.g. Bernie. The most milquetoast “radical” tested

          America only has an appetite for far right radicals atm, clearly.

          • Michael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            She wasn’t portrayed that way at all, you understand that right?

            Everybody knows that those on the far-right drip are trained to think everybody to the left of them (even a little bit) is a radical.

            Liberal mainstream media did not portray her that way at all.

            even a shitload of “centrists” (quotes because most have been captured by the magats without being aware) think she was radical.

            You’re likely referring to old-school Republicans/conservatives, and they either didn’t vote (because they are disenfranchised) or voted Trump, yes. Some may have voted Kamala, but not as much as she might have hoped (given her strategy to shift right).

            A significant amount of people don’t vote in this country and the Democrats aren’t interested in capturing that demographic, nor are they interested in capturing progressive or leftist voters.

            …and because they aren’t trying to appeal to anyone besides people who absolutely cannot abide by Trump, they lost and will likely continue to lose in the big elections if they don’t run on something to attract voters.

            E.g. Bernie.

            Who never got a chance in a general election because he got ratfucked 2x in a row by the Democratic Party et. al.

            The most milquetoast “radical” tested

            Bernie is the lesser evil here - he’s milquetoast, but not as milquetoast as e.g. Kamala, Biden, and Obama are to their corporate donors.

            Bernie was a good sport, but he has principles he stands by and that’s more than those folks could say now.

            • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Who never got a chance in a general election because he got ratfucked 2x in a row by the Democratic Party et. al.

              This is just major debunked cope. People seem to forget, but when Trump ran for the first time, the whole “establishment” hated him, both left and right. Hell, even the heritage foundation didn’t want him. Until he got too big to ignore, he won through sheer brute force popularity. Bernie just lost the primaries to Hillary…if you think America has any capability right now to see anyone to the left of Bernie in power, you’re just delusional.

              Current America would rather take an old bumbling corrupt criminal rapist(pedo too?) brainlet instead of a qualified intelligent prosecutor/AG because a woman of colour is a bit too much. Don’t make the mistake of thinking your niche is anywhere near the norm.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      AOC is my top choice, but I know everybody has a million reasons why America wouldn’t elect her as president.

      But, I had this thought the other day, and I know this is nobody’s dream team, but possibly the odd couple situation that just might work. Am I crazy for thinking a Pritzker-AOC ticket might actually have a decent chance?

      • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Pritzkers are literally the billionaire family of the Hyatt hotel chain fortune. They are, if anything, one part of the problem with the democratic establishment. If you want there to be zero change in society when it comes to taxing the wealthy to create social safety nets, JB is your guy.

        Realistically there is zero chance that an actual progressive and a Pritzker could ever function on one ticket. Thats like Bernie running with Bezos, it makes no sense

        • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pritzker is a guy who comes from money but actually does try and govern for the people. I live in Illinois and he did a bang up job for COVID, is actively doing things to try and fight/resist ICE and shows up in person to talk to the people, has signed vaccination protections to law, he helped to get stalled projects (like road repairs) going, he’s helped with education funding and requiring homeschooling to have more standards, and more.

          Yeah, he’s not perfect but he’s at least one who fucking fights for the people and is trying to find ways to make things better for us in Illinois. I truly believe he would do the same on a national level.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Nobody hates Sociopathic Oligarchs more than I do, but there have been cases of ultra-wealthy people being sympathetic to the people.

            The best example is Franklin Roosevelt. By my general way of thinking, I never would have supported him based on his wealth alone. And yet he went in to do more for working people than any 10 presidents combined.

            So while my general attitude is to NEVER support a billionaire for office, I am prepared to make exceptions for the right candidate, but they have a very high bar to clear to get my support.

            Pritzker is looking like a possibility, but I’m still deciding. I’d love AOC, but she’s problematic at this stage. I can’t stand establishment Dems like Newsome. But I will vote for anyone who vows to purge MAGA from our government and our society, reconfigure our government to remove MAGA advantages, and then follows through.

            We have to deal decisively with MAGA before we can do any thing else. We can deal with progressive policies after that.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Definitely among the top five people that should be president. AOC is my first pick, but I would be alright with Pritzker too. Newsom is vaguely acceptable, in the sense that he at least has the ability to lead and isn’t a complete idiot. I guess he would at #10.

          • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I never said he is a bad governor or even a bad politician. I said it is antithetical for anyone who is legitimate progressive to run with him. The Prtizkers at large are the type of people who are democrats in the interest of protecting their money. Typical establishment democrats who will make limited concessions in whatever way is needed to prevent any radical change from occurring. No DemSoc or Progressive candidates or voters should be foolish enough to let the fox be in charge of the henhouse

            Being better than nutjob conservative billionaires doesnt make someone a good fit to run with progressive candidates

            • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              We will see if the progressives like Mandani can do what they say. There is still a lot of resistance in law and interests against them. I think that’s why people get these aspirations to do big positive things in government and then can’t because reality hits. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but it’s going to take multiple years and rounds of those kinds of elections and the voters do not have that patience.

        • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          So the argument most people seem to focus on regarding AOC is that she’s too far left, especially in terms of economics. If we could have an actual progressive VP, I would hope we could logically then actually have a progressive as a president.

          Pritzker may be from a wealthy family, and not be extremely progressive in terms of economics, but several of his economic policies seem more progressive than a lot of establishment Democrats. They would be an odd couple, but might offset each other enough to make a good team and cast a wide net.

          He raised minimum wage in his state to $15 an hour back in 2019, he passed a law to protect collective bargaining, and he passed a graduated tax law that didn’t make people making $250K or less pay more in taxes.

          I would say the least likeable trait, and probably the thing that would make their pairing least likely, would be his unwillingness to call for the ceasefire in Israel until October of 2024 (which sadly is still a better track record than a lot of establishment Dems).

          It’s also worth noting that he apparently funded his own campaign for governor with his own wealth, and that could make him less beholden to big donors like many establishment Dems.

          I also think he and AOC are two of the few politicians who could really mop the floor with the MAGA narrative control bullshit, and their individual strengths and differences could make them more difficult to target with typical narrative control attacks.

    • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think USAmericans gotta hit the streets, now, yelling “We won’t vote for Gruesome Newsom” just in case we do get a 2028 Election. If we don’t destroy his campaign now, he’ll be ushered to the front of the Democratic Primary like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Sounds like aborting the fetus of opposition before it reaches viability.

        The left has NEVER been in control of the Democratic Party.

        Correct option is getting DSA candidates more light and having DSA candidates running as Dems.

      • webdox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Grow up. You will have the chance to vote for him or one of the other Dems that run in 2028 when you have your primaries. You and your ilk are the reason why Trump got power and regained it. You are as bad for democracy as the rabid, right wing Nazis.

        • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Cool. Let’s have another Biden-esque presidency that just leaves Americans unsatisfied to the point where they come out en-masse and vote for Vance because “it was better under the prior administration” until they realize that, whoops! they aren’t actually better under Vance, but now it’s too late.

          Voting Biden in 2020 as a transitional candidate obviously wasn’t the right move. Establishment Dems are the reason the non-political Americans get rallied against “the Left”. All that figures like Biden and Newsom do is empower “both sides” political apathy.

          • webdox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Biden beat Trump soundly in 2020. You can blame the Dem PTB and Biden all you want but Biden 2020 clearly wasn’t Biden 2024. Americans were unsatisfied with someone who was obviously in the throws of late onset Dementia. No one can predict what is going to happen cognitively with old people and it can happen rather quickly. The same exact fate might befall Trump before 2028 when he thinks he is going to run again before you give the nod to JD.

            2020 to 2024 was also a period when the GOP smear machine was eviscerating everything Biden did with the complicit help of the Conservative MSM from Trump’s Afghanistan withdraw that he, himself drew up to Hunter’s laptop and dick. They were wildly successful painting the Dems, not just Biden, as weak, intellectual cucks. Gavin is not that. He is the anti that. He comes off as a man’s man. Something that is required to win in this day and age. As you should be able to tell by now, policy means jack shit to the American voter any longer. Stance on issues means less. The want a talking head that looks good in front of the camera and talks America first talk. The young male voters want “Alpha Males” that show uo to UFC fights and then hosts them on the WH lawn. The game has changed forever. Time to start playing it right.

            Craziness would be to run a woman again. Gavin’s Trump-esque Tweets have gotten more people excited about the rub in in their face retribution the base is yearning for right now. These traitors need to be punished, first in the court of public opinion ,then at the ballot box, and ultimately in the courts. Those 4 years of the Dems doing nothing to counter the momentum Trump continued to gain every day might go down as the turning point in our Democracy . We will find that in in a few, short months.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You guys demand democrats stand up to trump and the moment one does, you sit on them and kick them down. You guys deserve every bit of trump

      • webdox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        100% and there is no way all of these downvotes are organic. There is a pretty obvious right wing brigading going on. Many people pretending to be democrats. Even more pretending to be Americans. This is why many left Reddit.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Making memes online is not standing up to a fascist, thats a delusional take. Pritzker vowing to arrest people who help ICE agents is standing up to a fascist. And neither of those things alone make’s a good candidate.

    • Maeve@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He is only telling a part of the truth, the palatable part, while disingenuously omitting the rest.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      ·
      1 day ago

      They also rigged the last election, and every election for several decades.

      If all of the Geriatric Old Pedophiles various attempts at election fraud were prosecuted the US wouldn’t be a failing fascist state today.

      “Purging” voters, “gerrymandering”, etc are morally and ethically no different than election fraud; you’ve already chosen treason against democracy.

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The smallest balls are still the biggest in a room full of eunuchs… The only thing good about Newsom is his PR team’s social media campaigns, and sadly that puts him far ahead of everyone else. Literally nothing else makes him worthy of consideration (or even mention). Dems have gone out of their way to be as inept and complicit as possible, and have purged nearly all authenticity from the party. It’s a hollow shell for capital interests wrapped in a pride flag and a costume of ‘civility.’ It’s fucking embarrassing that he’s as popular as he is right now, but that’s the best you can get from ‘liberals’ who see Bernie and Mamdani as a threat.

      • Mangoguana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        You better start finding a better candidate bro before the lesser evil is nominated then.

        You can’t complain about what is happening around you unless you give a solution.

        • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There’s MANY better candidates. Problem is the actual good ones would never dream of aligning themselves with either major party. It’s why everything needs to be nuked from orbit.

          • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            It’s so funny how people get all up in arms defending shitbag neolibs as if they have no other option when the democratic socialist are literally right there.

            People like the guy you responded to are why we keep losing, fucking crabs in a bucket.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          You can’t complain about what is happening around you unless you give a solution.

          This is the stupidest take, give me one reason why? Am I also not allowed to complain about the rising cancer rates without giving a solution for those? I sure as shit better not hear you complain about AI ever again unless you can tell me how to fix it too. And global warming? Better just shut the fuck up about it until you personally have a plan on how to fix that.

          All this phrase is is a cudgel to shut up people you don’t want to have to address.

        • mika_mika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes you can complain and should complain, probably louder. Have fun licking boot, people like you are why we got Trump.

          • Mangoguana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Be the change you want to see, complain all you want but all you are doing is setting yourself and the world around you for more complaining.

            (Spoilers for disco elysium) You remind me of that disco elysium communist ending, where all the comrades end up wasting their lives complaining about the bourgeoisie without actually doing anything about it, getting drunk every night each taking turns judging which sickly misery inducing rant was the most powerful.

            • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              14 hours ago

              “Be the change you want to see”

              All I’ve seen you do is shut down conversation with bullshit about how neolibs are our only option.

              Is that what you want to see?

              People on their highhorse bullshit like this is exactly how we wound up with trump.

            • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Real world is the levellers and the diggers and good ol’ Oliver Cromwell.

              Everyone complaining. Everyone calling for change. King killed. No one had a plan for after.

              Systems will only change if there is an environment conducive of that change.

              I would argue Obama knows this. Change is incremental.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The answer isn’t Newsom or Trump. I’d take Warren, despite her age. I’d take AOC.

          • Soulg@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            If newsom wins the primary then you take newsom in the general.

            I don’t want him to win the primary either but I’m not stupid.

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Remember when Biden and the Democrats reversed Trump’s damage by keeping his border restrictions and asylum crackdowns “for now, just until the system’s ready”? upholding several of his fossil fuel leases because “our hands are tied”? dragging their feet on reinstating clean water and emissions rules because the EPA needed more studies? maintaining bloated Pentagon budgets and arms sales while calling it “responsible leadership”? doing nothing to undo Trump’s tax cuts for corporations, but telling working people that the economy is “booming”? forgetting about the Stream Protection Rule, union rights, and the public option once the election was over? and still treating whistleblowers, immigrants, and Palestine like they’re political inconveniences?

              The adults will be back in the room with Newsom.

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Newsom’s stance against human rights is concerning. Newsom’s sophomoric trolling against Trump is not Presidential. If his campaign did it? Sure. But this is coming from him. I don’t want a man child in office. Newsom is captive to corporations. That’s not what I want for my President.

                • 3abas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  That last line was sarcastic btw, I completely agree with you. Newsom is a fascist and the DNC doesn’t support progressive candidates. America needs a revolution, yesterday.

            • hddsx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              I’m sorry, but Newsom gives me the same ick as Trump. I would consider third party if Newsom is nominated. That’s how much I don’t want him to be president, and I voted for both Biden and Harris.

      • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am tired of people with your attitude. Holy shit you’re an insufferable group.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    21 hours ago

    As far as I can tell, Newsom is just a ‘fascist, but not too obvious, so people won’t protest’ kind of candidate. A perfect pick if you want to salvage what remains of the empire and delay its inevitable collapse. But then again, it’s not like Americans have any reasonable candidates. And we’re also going on the assumption that there will be another election, so let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

    Would he be an improvement for the American people? And for other countries? At the very least, minorities in the USA would be [mostly] safe for a few years.

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      He’s just your stereotypical neoliberal corporate Democrat which is a much better alternative to Trump’s admin. I don’t like Newsom like most on here, but if he gets the nomination still show the fuck up.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      He’s a capitalist. Fascist I don’t think so. We have to stop purity testing left candidates, it’s a trap. So what if he doesn’t have every opinion we have - he’s more in touch with the average voter on those issues, frankly. We need to start thinking like we want to win, not like we want to be right.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        He’s a capitalist.

        He’s an American politician. Of course he is.

      • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Inb4 I’m not calling you (specifically you) out. The you is aimed at “People of America” as a whole

        independent of left or right, I’d like to say you guys need to elect someone that doesn’t expand that list further more:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change

        In other words, Could You All Please Stop Fucking Raping The “Global South”? Pretty Please???

        And I’m using the word rape both metaphorically and literal at the same time. Also, I’m not downplaying the word. I’m just pointing out the fucked up things US (as a nation) did to all of us outside of “global north”, “western civilization”, “first world” or whatever term you guys keeping using to refer to us, the “inferior” class of “subhumans” people.

        The US was always imperialist, but now the masks are off and Trump is just bringing what US did to other countries (see the list above) inwards to US. That’s why most of the population are worried.

        Except for the few leftist that called out what US always was, most people aren’t worried of US raping other countries. But they are now worried because the military force is turning inwards against the enemy within.

      • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Leftists in USA do need to band together, and I feel like it is more difficult to do so because of our individually. Most of our goals are common.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are actively shaping the electoral environment. They don’t just want to, they are actively preparing to do so.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    MMW: Prop 50 is going to make somethings worse. I live on a blue island in a red sea in the blue state of California. Disenfranchising voters is going to lead to violence. If they were serious they would give us rank choice voting.

    • JuBe@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The proposition is time-limited, and will revert back to independent redistricting organization after 2030.

    • themaninblack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I feel alone in my opposition to this proposition. Especially on this platform where most believe the ends justify the means.

      You can’t answer voter disenfranchisement with more voter disenfranchisement. District lines should always be determined in a nonpartisan way, full stop.

      That having been said we should implement more federal control of voting, at least for federal contests.

      I also have much more radically left views in some ways. For example that we should use jury nullification against the emerging American gestapo, have zero tolerance for sieging the fucking capitol building (including shooting those who try), remove corrupt Democratic leadership by prosecution if necessary, etc.

      But democracy is democracy. I still have loyalty to enlightenment ideals ffs.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Gerrymandering has been a problem for decades, and it’s only getting worse.

        It’s possible that the only way to get fair election maps is to min/max the system to the extreme. And once everyone sees how horrible it is, maybe they’ll be willing to actually work together to fix the system.

        If we wait for a perfect solution that causes no friction, we’ll be waiting forever. We can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

        • themaninblack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I am also a bit of an accelerationist.

          I can’t help but think that if the Democrats could improve conditions for the common people without resorting to tactics that undermine the principle of one man = one vote, we’d see them getting a lot more votes.

          They could keep up the pressure to eliminate the electoral college, for example.

          Unfortunately there have been just enough shitty centrist dems elected, and a plurality of even shittier Republicans being elected, to block the best proposals. The best hope we had for universal healthcare, for example, was blocked by one man - Joseph Lieberman.

          To say nothing of the corporate interests and billionaire donors that influence policy making in the party, and the feckless leadership, that is.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Not asking for perfect, but better than terrible. Genocide is terrible. What ICE is doing is terrible. Rigging elections is terrible.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        yall need more laws that are based on dynamic countering of negative forces

        ie minimum wage should adjust yearly with inflation…

        in this case, states that are against gerrymandering should form a pact to nullify its effects: if another state gerrymanders, between them they must gerrymander opposite to at least the same magnitude. if enough states get on board, gerrymandering is done

        it’s possible to measure gerrymandering, and states know that it’s in their best interest to stop another state from doing it. the only thing that’s needed is inter-state cooperation

        • themaninblack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          These are a couple of great points:

          1. Minimum wage should be tied to inflation

          Economist Robert Schiller has proposed a similar idea where we set up a reactive economic policy to execute automatically when some measures of inequality (e.g. the Gini coefficient) rise above a predefined level.

          1. An inter-state pact to manage the effect of gerrymandering

          Great idea. Reminds me of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact)

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Economist Robert Schiller has proposed a similar idea where we set up a reactive economic policy to execute automatically when some measures of inequality (e.g. the Gini coefficient) rise above a predefined level.

            we do it in australia and it works great… tied to CPI

            Reminds me of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

            exactly where i got the idea!