• gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think that’s what this administration want us to think, but in reality

      White House officials said that covering the cost of military pay for the first half of October totaled about $6.5 billion. Todd Harrison, a defense budget analyst at the American Enterprise Institute

      FFS, could the news media go more than two sentences without treating a right wing hack organization like a serious viewpoint, fuck

      Ugh, whatever, sorry for interrupting, do some middle school level math for us Todd

      Todd Harrison, a defense budget analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, said that based on that figure, the new donation will cover about one-third of one day’s pay for the force.

      So, yeah, this is a dumb stunt designed to get us to think they just privatized the military, but it’s actually empty bullshit

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If groceries cost us $500 per month and our government says it accepted $10 from an anonymous donor to help pay for next months groceries, what does it mean?

    Like what just happened? Did they just make a joke / are they fucking with people?

    Are they only funding their gestapo? Are they strategically activating specific personnel via a check, and ignoring less critical or more motivated soldiers?

    It’s as if someone threw some coins at the crowd just for a chance to talk about how it’s the Democrats who “opted” not to pay them. I wish they more deliberately explored the “it costs billions to pay the military yet the 130 million is gonna do… something” part of the story.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    ‘Partially’ seems a bit generous. This is a bit like when I was busking and someone dropped a 5c piece in my case. I saw that as basically littering.

  • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You know what is better than this “gift”? A functional tax system that actually captures and allocates what a fair share of wealth/earnings a person has or accumulates each year.

    • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh it won’t be distributed evenly to “the force” in any way, shape, or form; it will be used to bribe a few top officers in key positions to ensure the coup progresses smoothly without military intervention.

      They are paying our military to look the other way. And our military will conveniently forget about all the oaths they swore and comply.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fascists don’t care about any part of government other than military and police. If they can keep those two funded from outside sources, they never have to pass a budget or reopen Congress and the government is effectively captured by whoever pays the bill and consist only of the violence that keeps everyone obedient.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    In a country awash in guns, ain’t nobody got no balls.

    Well, except for that one kid.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “Puppies for sale. Going cheap… going ‘woof’” - The Goodies And The Beanstalk

      Just a random thing that pooped into my head on reading your comment :)

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Exactly, you get it. There are a bunch of people running around who got a cheat code for life-changing amounts of untraceable* money. They did nothing more than run the right software at the right time, but they think that makes them geniuses. They are pouring it into this administration right now, because our President has made it clear that he is for sale to the highest bidder.

        * = yeah, I know BTC really is traceable, its security is in the math of large numbers. But anyone dabbling in BTC that early is at least smart enough to know how to maintain their anomymity.

        • quick_snail@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          It’s not possible to maintain anonymity on bitcoin. We were especially ignorant of that in the early days.

          Also, I would argue that the majority of btc early adopotes were antifascists. The capitalists came later.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            You think these early adopters actually kept their moral compass after becoming bazillionaires? They’re capitalists now, too.

            • quick_snail@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              Many people did, yes. Many others didn’t, yes.

              Not everyone is corrupted by money.

              I’m one of them (well not a bazillionare, but I got in early enough to retire in my 30s). I spend most of my time doing volunteer work for nonprofits.