Pretty ignorant of China’s politics myself, who to follow for good coverage of what’s going on in China? This latest consolidation of power by Xi, is it more of the same or is this something we haven’t seen before?

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This is a continuation of Xi solidifying control over the government, which is a break from the post-Mao CCP in having power more diffused across different people. It is likely that the corruption allegations are correct, but bribing officials to win government contracts are pretty par for the course for people in those positions.

  • LSNLDN@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My go to for news is Novara Media and they occasionally interview a guy who does podcasts on the intersection of western/Chinese culture, maybe a good one but idk outside of their reports. His name is Kaiser Kuo

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      seems just gossip. Couldn’t have the patience to wade through until a policy difference between Xi and anyone else in Chinese establishment was mentioned. What are the policy differences being explored?

  • jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It kind of depends on whether or not you speak Mandarin.

    One thing to keep in mind is that noone has a clear picture of what is going on in the top levels of the PLA, nor the CCP. And that is intentional, of course.

    Unless you have a foundation, avoid the China-Fact-Chasers guys, as they are very one-sided, despite their vast 1st person experience living in China. Lei-talks has a less extreme interpretation, with lots of numbers to back things up - and will also go off on the fantastical topics here and there. Ken Cao puts out a lot of content, as does David Zhang, also very anti-CCP

    There is a GProf show that focuses on the Chinese markets which helps balance the economy knowledge, but is weak on politixal content.

    • @SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world @jaxxed@lemmy.world

      I’m a native mandarin speaker and China’s politics seems so opaque af. All I really know if the real life experiences as like a civillian, and stories my parents told me, and my 8 years of childhood memories there. No clue what the fuck is happening inside Beijing.

      I mean I can tell you about my personal experiences of what life is like, but I don’t know about how the political system even fuctions. Even my parents that grew up there and lived there for decades there doesn’t know wtf is going on in the politics. Its blurry, it’s confusing. In my view, it feels kinda like another imperial dynasty, but with CCP as a party at top instead of a traditional monarch.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What’s wrong with being anti-CCP? I hate China’s corrupted government almost as much as I hate the USA’s.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Some of the anti-CCP stuff is too heavily algorythmucally captured, and ends up being “China will lose” - which is both wrong, and the wr0ng way to look at the world.

        The China-Chaser guys can be the worst for this, as the tend(ed) to phrase the everrything as a US vs China competition - for which the US is destroying the Chinese. Any realist out there knows that the Chinese and US economies are so intertwined that they are both in trouble.

        Truthfully, I find that I am anti-CCP, as you can tell bt my suggestions. I try to balance it out, bit I avoid those “US fails as China soars” channels. I tjimk that I tend to follow Taiwanese producers, as they have healthy concern but strong independence. Also I hate bully countries.

  • bitofarambler@crazypeople.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Which latest consolidation of power?

    I use 1440 for news in general, and if I want to confirm or get more context on something, I use a few different sources as possible to piece together the consistent facts.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Xi disappeared two top generals, but there are signs that he’s done it without party approval and might have ruffled some feathers.

      • bitofarambler@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Few things going on there. Disappearing a couple generals is pretty par for the course for Xi and it wouldn’t be ruffling any feathers if the economy wasn’t stumbling, unemployment wasn’t crazy high and his covid policy wasn’t an unmitigated paying-it-forward disaster.

        He’s probably asserting authority because he knows he’s run out of a lot of runway, and I’ve read things and listened to people saying that Xi is really at the end of his rope, but being in China myself recently, so educated guess having talked to Chinese people, unless there’s a military coup, which seems imprudent and not to the advantage of the military, I don’t see Xi being ousted from leadership.

        He’s changed the constitution so that he can be president for life, released indoctrination pamphlets, but way more importantly on the ground, has dominated trump publicly and repeatedly, which Chinese people love to see, and the technological infrastructure of China is so rapidly outpacing the rest of the world due to Xi’s directives(400% mediacal tourism increase in the last 5 years, more than double solar energy installation than the other 199 countries combined every year, 25% of global battery energy grid storage added annually in China, BYD destroying Tesla, driverless taxis, delivery drones, wind farms/turbines) that China already looks incredibly futuristic and has no reason to continue advancing.

        It’s impossible to know, but i think this move will further strengthen his cult of personality, like removing Hu Jintao physically from the closing ceremony, and that head party and military members won’t want to risk removing Xi from power now for fear of losing this opportunity to completely outpace the US in practically every field while trump is fumbling everything scientific, social, and technological while politically losing almost a century of international goodwill and trust.

        2028? Depends on how Xi does. But I can’t see the advantage to any faction in China by throwing away this golden opportunity trump has handed to them.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This power struggle feud has been going on for at least rwo years, with various levels of hostility, peaking in open military posturing in the streets.

  • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    On this topic, I am myself somewhat partial towards the sources associated with Falun Gong, for while they obviously are highly motivated to spin everything to make the Communist Party look as bad as possible, they’re also not easily intimidated and well placed to find actual facts that few others are able to uncover.

      • despoticruin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The alternative is outright state censored and strictly follows party lines. If you know how to read between the lines you can pick out the bits of actual news that don’t make it out through more mainstream sources. Granted, it’s still by and large just cult propaganda, but any port in a storm as they say.

      • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        As far as cults go, they don’t sound like a “literal cult” when reading about them on Wikipedia:

        Ian Johnson argued that applying the ‘cult’ label to Falun Gong effectively “cloaked the government’s crackdown with the legitimacy of the West’s anticult movement”. He wrote that Falun Gong does not satisfy common definitions of a cult: “its members marry outside the group, have outside friends, hold normal jobs, do not live isolated from society, do not believe that the world’s end is imminent and do not give significant amounts of money to the organisation … it does not advocate violence and is at heart an apolitical, inward-oriented discipline, one aimed at cleansing oneself spiritually and improving one’s health.”[74]: 224  David Ownby similarly wrote that “the entire issue of the supposed cultic nature of Falun Gong was a red herring from the beginning, cleverly exploited by the Chinese state to blunt the appeal of Falun Gong”.[63]

        • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Falun Gong is anti China and you’re gonna take an anti China dude’s word on this uncritically?

          It is a cult. Go look into it more than just on Wikipedia ffs.

          • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            “do your own research, but don’t trust the thing stitched together by obsessive nerds trying to help you do research” is the sort of thing conspiracy nuts say.

            To support your position on contested facts, always provide a link. Any link, with as many options as you care to include. Quotes are nice but not required.

            • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t have time to try and educate someone who’s desire to learn stops at Wikipedia lmao. I have better things to do. Be more curious and challenge yourself a bit

              • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                If you have time to yell “go do your own research!” but can’t be bothered to provide even one link, please don’t get upset if you’re dismissed as a loon.

                To paraphrase an old idea: That which was asserted without evidence should be dismissed without evidence.

                https://ozgurnevres.com/hitchens-razor-evidence/

                • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Seems you are proving my point here instead of spending time to go look anything else up you’d rather remain ignorant and keep blabbing here lol