• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago
        1. Does Canada have the kind of military aerospace background to speedrun a program like that? Genuinely don’t know.

        2. Buying from America’s enemy sends a very different message. Just building your own missile looks like America’s vassal having pout; it’ll be used against NATO’s(read America’s) enemies anyway, essentially doing what Trump asked all NATO members and increasing their contribution to America’s sphere, for free. Cozying up to the other superpower signals that Canada actually prepared to break it off if the US doesn’t cut yall a better deal.

          • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            51 minutes ago
            1. We still do. That was a nascent effort, not some built up military industrial complex and it stil exceeded all rivals at the time.

            2. Why? Being a supplicant to a bully.

        • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago
          1. Going from supplicant to one abusive superpower to another sends the wrong message. Carney’s Davos speech spelled it out for you.

          2. Yes. We have virtually all the skills, expertise and knowhow with a few notable exceptions. (Submarines, we could build them but at great cost and a learning curve.) We could build nukes in a year if we wanted to. The delivery system would take longer than the payload, but we could do that too.

          3. Chinese goods are cheap because market function and the profit motive was not of central concern, neither human rights, labour rights or environmental rights. Your claim of “cheap” is badly distorted. There were costs born by the Chinese peoples across each of these domains that don’t show up on an invoice, but the bill always comes due and is paid in full. Your definition of “cheap” is a perversion of full cost accounting to suit a narrative.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Isn’t that similar to the shit that got Turkey kicked out of the F35 program?

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes, except Russia instead of China.

        To what extent it was the US sending other countries a message “Buy American or else” vs “We think you’ll let the radar systems send data on F-35s to Russia”, we don’t know, but if the second was a genuine concern, all the better for keeping F-35s away from your airspace.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Give us money or we will attack you” is generally not something you say to an ally you want to keep. Trump is literally insane, trying to start WW3.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is just robbery, we weren’t able to make our schedule and modified the price. “$27.7 billion in cost – up from its initial $19 billion.”

    Yet expect them to just give us $7 billion dollars because we failed to meet the contract?

  • xyro@morbier.foo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Buy or weapons or else…” Maybe we should look for a more reliable supplier and close our airspace to their jet fighters.

    • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not even close.

      They’re suggesting that Canada won’t be able to defend its own airspace so US will have to be able to operate more freely in Canadian than they already do. They are saying that the NORAD agreement would need to be updated to accommodate this.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And neither Finland nor Sweden are at war with Russia despite it. Bullshit tactic used by fucking putin yes but act of war no.

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You seem to be applying a pretty strict definition to what is actually an arbitrary term. An act of war can be anything that any nation wants to call an act of war.

            So I guess we should probably just use some of the countries involved in the real life case we are talking about.

            Does anyone consider violation of airspace by a nations warplanes to be in-and-of-itself an act of war or at least a proactive action worthy of escalation and retaliation? Oh yeah, the United States does. And so does Russia.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You know, like you do to allies when the commander in chief isn’t a Russian asset.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What are they going to do in Canadian airspace? like… fly around?

    Pretty weird behavior for an ally.

    Canada might think about halting lumber and oil shipments if they are too distracted by fighter jets overhead to work. Those jets are loud and annoying. What then? Seems like trump will chicken out and walk back his childishness like he always does.

    Only winner here is Putin, same as always. What a coincidence.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I will continue to post this every time someone insinuates that someone else should murder Trump/ICE Agents/ etc. Do it yourself or better yet, you can focus on protecting you and yours instead.

      In the US we have the Second Amendment. The fascists have been the ones screaming and yelling about the Second Amendment, but the truth is that all Americans have the right.

      Owning a gun isn’t enough. Driving to Cabela’s and picking up a vermin killing .22 is not enough. You should buy a proper rifle, a pistol, and a knife or baton. (Bonus points for a shotgun) Then you need to train with said rifle, pistol and knife/baton. Go to a range and shoot. Look for local self defense/hand to hand combat with a weapon classes and train.

      I am not advocating for violence…far from it. But I am advocating for knowledge because owning a weapon and not knowing how to use it is a recipe for disaster.

      PS: If you can afford it, buy suppressors or active hearing protection. Especially for your rifles. Suppression for the common citizen isn’t about stealth like in the movies, it is about protecting your hearing. Guns are LOUD. Much louder than you expect. At the bare minimum, make sure you have quality active hearing protection.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Lol, F-35s are in maintenance most of the time, we can use our new made in Canada gripens to patrol the sky while the F-35s wait for parts on the u reliable piece of shit.

    The future is electronics warfare packages, not stealth.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The future is electronics warfare packages, not stealth.

      The fact that you’re talking about the F35 and you said this kinda suggests that you don’t actually know much about the F35.