• boogiebored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So many companies are cozying up to the fascist regime as this is the late stage of capitalism.

    A list of some of these companies: https://x.com/vxunderground/status/2024200204296061089?s=20

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    Yea, I can just imagine OpenAI is really struggling with their business decision.

    On the one hand, they have multi-billion dollar contracts with the US Military that will make them all fabulously wealthy beyond their wildest dreams.

    On the other, they have a handful of individuals leaving that might amount to a few thousand dollars of lost revenue.

    Gosh, it must sure be a tough decision for them.

  • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I cannot believe this is what it took for a boycott to go more mainstream. Tell me more about how so many people have no respect for the environment or the artists who’s work they gleefully consume.

  • perishthethought@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    mainstream

    I’ll believe that when my sisters start saying this. Till then, it’s just us privacy fans screaming in a dark cave, enjoying the echo.

    • Xorg_Broke_Again@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s always like this. We get a ton of articles on how everyone is suddenly boycotting/deleting [insert thing] but when you ask someone in real life, they usually have no idea what you’re talking about.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 hours ago

        so explain it to them gently. you won’t reach everyone, but you’ll reach more people than accepting this status quo

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Use for “all lawful means” is quite the grey area considering no one was arrested or fired, or any law updated, for what Snowden leaked. If the NSA does it, no one will arrest the NSA.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      I laughed when I read “all lawful means.”

      Those are almost the exact words that you’re supposed to use for a NFA form 1 / 4 when registering certain types of firearms / firearms parts that require a tax stamp, and additional scrutiny.

      When I did my SBR registration, it was “all lawful purposes…” but fuck, close enough…

  • David_Eight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The Department of War isn’t a real thing. Its called The Department of Defense. That’s not my opinion either, its officially/legally called The Department of Defense.

      • Totally Human Emdash User@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Only Congress can change the name of the Department of Defense, and not only has it not passed any legislation to do so, but the most National Defense Authorization Act, which was passed after Trump’s executive order, only mentions the “Department of Defense” and never the “Department of War”.

        So, no, there is not officially a Department of War, there continues to only officially be a Department of Defense.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Oh, well today I learned. I had assumed that even the world’s dumbest government officials wouldn’t refer to themselves as being part of a department that doesn’t actually exist, but here we are.

          Thanks for laying it out for me!

        • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’re right. I researched it, and it was just changed 6 months ago by Trump, who claimed the new name “sends a message of victory”

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No. Trump declared it changed, much like Michael Scott declaring bankruptcy. Until there is an act of Congress changing the name, it is still the DoD, and the Kennedy Center is the Kennedy Center, and so on.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Windows Central shouldn’t be parroting the U.S. government in mislabeling the Department of Defense.

    • lmdnw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Especially since the Trump admin already made it clear that they don’t respect preferred pronouns. Why should we use the DoD’s preferred pronouns of Department of War instead of the Department of Defense name it legally has? DoW is just DoD’s preferred pronoun.

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think you’re in denial. If they had changed the name of Homeland Security into the dep of National Security for example, you probably wouldn’t say that media outlets is parroting the us government.

      • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Because it’s still officially called the Department of Defense; only Congress can rename it.

        More broadly, it illustrates the administration’s use of illegal boat strikes and regime change as foreign policy tools.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    After Anthropic refused flat out to agree to apply Claude AI to autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of American citizens, OpenAI jumps right into bed with the United States Department of War.

    I think people are a little bit missing the important bit. This government wants to send out autonomous weapons along with mass surveillance. They’ll just murder anyone they want, if the AI gets it right in the first place.

    Here we are in Running Man and no one sees it coming. This is why Stephen King is so against this administration. He predicted it.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Also, mass surveillance. Not surveillance itself. And fully autonomous weapons.

      Don’t get distracted by the birdy folks, Anthropic is not your friend, or some great protector of the American people. They were already deeply embedded in the US Government as their product was the only one certified for use with classified documents.

      They weren’t standing up for us, they were splitting hairs on exactly how far they’d openly go.

      I’ve also seen statements that Anthropic’s stance against fully autonomous weapons was simply due to results not yet being as consistent as they were comfortable putting their name on, not due to any opposition towards use in/with weaponry.

      OpenAI also claims to have the same limitations. So someone’s lying.

      • Hackworth@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Amodei said in an interview that the DoW altered their contract to appear to compromise, so that it looked like they were agreeing to those use limits. But that legalese accompanying the updates rendered that text pointless. Basically, “We won’t use Claude for mass domestic surveillance and full automated killing, unless we really want to.” My guess is OpenAI signed the exact same contract and just pretended not to understand the toothlessness of the guardrails.

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I can’t believe now we (Americans) have to pay for it with our tax dollars.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Many times it’s mandatory. Like when your employer forces it upon you and makes it automatically invoke ChatGPT whenever you open a pull request.

        • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I “use” ChatGPT because my employer has forced it into the workflow, and they’re the ones paying OpenAI. So I now have a linear relationship with ChatGPT through my employer. The more work I do, the more I use ChatGPT, even though I do not have a choice in the matter and if it were up to me I’d not be using any AI tools at all.

          Using it is now part of my performance evaluation beginning this year.