Yes i understand how when the British colonized India and got those exotic spices and the Indians who immigrated to the UK, opened up lots of restaurants there. But still, in my 1st trip to the UK last year, I saw more Indian dishes than Chinese. Heck, even in a Chinese restaurant, we have the option to add some curry sauce on the side. And for the fish and chip shops, you can even have curry sauce to go with the chips and fish.

Is this a culinary thing, i.e. curries are easier to cook? My friend is Indian and although the curries look easy to make, gathering the correct ingredients is very tricky. Missing one and your dish doesnt turn out well. The UK already had these exotic spices so it is easier to make the dish?

Or is it a regional thing? It is freezing in England and so hot dishes like curries are perfect? Traditional stews are kinda bland so something liquid like curry is better?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Non answer but it reminds me that Britainized Indian food is the same as Americanized Chinese food. Changed enough that its actually counts as its own unique thing which I guess is cool.

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think indian food is more popular than chinese because

    • there are more indian curry places
    • because we have closer ties to india
    • and much more people of indian descent than of chinese

    So it’s what people have more exposure to.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    When you’ve been eating boiled chicken and wheat for 10,000 years, a curry is like a handjob for your tastebuds

  • polysexualstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I mean you pretty much answered your own question. The UK never colonised China to anything even remotely close to the degree they colonised India. Which is also why there’s more than 4 times as many people with Indian heritage in the UK than with Chinese heritage. So there’s absolutely zero reason why there should be as many Chinese restaurants/dishes in the UK as there are Indian restaurants/dishes.

    • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah the UK/Chinese relationship turned out very differently than the US/Chinese relationship, which is why OP’s own comparison is to Chinese restaurants (presumably their local “default ethnic cuisine”).

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Chinese food is a hard one to compare to. Since western Chinese food is not entirely Chinese and more a Cantonese fusion that was invented in new York then exported worldwide. Its main feature being adapting local ingredients to the same base template. So it is always different depending on the region. In China it is considered a form of western fast food and not at all traditional.

    • Akasazh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Dutch Chinese food is a bizarre mix of Cantonese and Indonesian dishes. As well, we colonized Indonesia.

      There was this folk singer who loved Chinese food, so when he visited china he took the menu from his home town restaurant, which had the dishes written in Chinese.

      Which is a clever thing to do, in itself, but the Chinese restaurateur in China knew almost none of those dishes

    • P1nkman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Western Chinese food is not the same in the West! I’ve had Chinese food in Norway, Denmark, UK, USA, and Australia; sure, they all serve sweet & sour, but you will not find honey chicken in Norway (fuck I miss that shit from Australia!).

  • glasratz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I suppose there are so many people with Indian roots in GB that you can actually get good Indian food there. There’s competition and enough people who know how it’s supposed to taste like. I mean, where I live in Germany we have Indian restaurants run by Indian immigrants, but they are quite often not very good.

    • starlinguk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Where I live in Germany there’s a great Indian restaurant, but the locals don’t like it. I suppose because it doesn’t serve mango chicken 🙄

    • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      this is very important. There is both traditional and BIR food

      (British Indian Restaurant)

      And enough competition that the standards are high

  • TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 hours ago

    We like food in general.

    I think there’s some misunderstanding here though. ‘curry’ is a thing all over Asia, not just India.

  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    They aren’t. “Indian curries” are a British invention, where in the C17th onward a vast collection of dishes from disparate and very regionalised cuisines were conflated together by those in the Raj as “curries”.

    These curries were adapted and created for British tastes, and were not eaten by the native populace. When men and later families came back to Britain from postings in the Raj they brought this new cuisine with them, and sometimes their cooks.

    Commercial Anglo-Indian cuisine appears from the 1920s, and with the end of the colony and the partition came a wave of immigrants from Pakistan, who opened up more establishments.

    The boom began with Bangladeshi refugees arriving in the 1970s, about the time when working classes were looking beyond fish and chips for “eating out”. Here British Indian Restaurant cuisine was formed from combining Anglo-Indian and Bangladeshi dishes. BIR is a highly modular style of cooking which allows a great degree of customisation by the customer, an economic use of ingredients, and the ability to fill almost any order within minutes.

  • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The biggest minority group in UK are pakistanis. And pakistani food is also “indian curry” so is other countries/culture’s food i bet.

    India of today and “indian” are kinda different concept imo. Even today’s india has a ton of different ethnic groups.

  • cøre@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The story I heard was the queen had an Indian chef who made curry, she liked it so much the people copied her and curry spread like wild through the UK.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There are lots of people with Indian roots in the UK. Opening a small takeaway is one of the easiest ways to get started as an entrepreneur so that’s what many of them did. Which resulted in a lot of those places being around. So when you’re hungry, you step outside and the nearest place sells currys, that’s what you’ll get.

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If you think a British stew is bland you’ve evidently never tried a joint of beef slow cooked in beer and gravy for 24 hours.