what the title says
No. Sexual harassment is a legal term that doesn’t apply to animals.
This says nothing about whether it’s morally wrong.Idk your mom said she had a good time and gave me her number.
…and 18.2 liters of milk
The cow is only able to produce milk because a farmer inseminated it to get it pregnant in the first place.
Yeah, the whole farming industry is based upon non-comsensual interfering and eugenics type stuff.
Thr line with rice and potatoes seems more blurry, are they farming us?
Only if you consider cow udders sexual. I don’t.
It’s probably more relevant if the cow considers them sexual.
I doubt it would serve as a defence if you grabbed someones boobs or dick and later in court explained that you don’t consider those body parts sexual.
You know how a farmer will have their entire arm in a cows ass? Do they get charged for bestiality or sodomy?
Farmers typically have some addendums in the usual laws.
Farmers don’t. Vets do.
Who jerked off horses before we invented giant pocket mares? The vet or the farmer?
Reference? I don’t think farmers have a vet on retainer to assist with every birth in the field.
Only if you like it, daddy. 😘
Only if you’re getting off on it.
On the face of it no, but there are a lot of ways to milk a cow that could qualify as sexual harassment.
No because killing a cow isn’t murder either
Not that I’m a vegan but vegans would argue otherwise
Well the vegans would be wrong as the definition of murder is to kill another human.
I think the way some vegans see this is that the definition of what constitues as murder is precisely the thing that is under debate here and should be extended to include deliberately and in a planned manner taking any life.
They’d be objectively wrong, since murder is defined as illegal homicide, not any unjustified killing.
