Or open up job prospect and educational value?

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Learning a language is a significant time investment, not only to learn the language but also to maintain proficiency. Unused skills degrade over time.

    In terms of priorities and benefits vs time investment, it simply doesn’t make the cut.

  • Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Limited time and resources means ypu can’t learn everything.

    Is there a lot to improve and should certain subjects be switched for others? Sure. But does learning 4 languages to a very basic degree (which you will likely almost never use and therefore forget) important enough to kick off other subjects? I don’t think so.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The general idea of school is to learn how to learn. Most of the core subjects are just the tip of their iceberg.
    Take the older software devs who didn’t have computers in school when they went. They technically use almost nothing they actually studied in school. So you don’t really want to requie an overload on any given subject. Schools are even dialing back the math requirements. Like pre-calc. Not everyone needs that. The required algebra is more about problem solving than equations now. Which is good. Let the kids follow thier interests a little more.

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fun fact: You can learn without school. There’s sooo much information outside of school walls, and it’s easier to access now than ever in the history of humanity.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      But learning in school gives you people to communicate with in the new language. Something that can be tougher to find on your own.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    In America, by far and away the next most commonly spoken language is Spanish. I could see a requirement making it so schools are made to teach Spanish, but I find it hard to see requiring them to teach any other language. Arguably, this might be better managed on the State level, since certain languages may be more common in different states.

  • Justifier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    You really are asking too much here

    We need to get math, geography, literature, history, writing, personal finance, and driving training working again first

    Want to know what my drivers ed consisted of?

    Not cars, no

    A signature of consent and having me/my class to view unredacted images and video of a girl who some of the people in that room personally knew from that very highschool who didn’t wear a seatbelt screaming with her face having been peeled off having passed through the windshield, and similar gory aftermath images

    Thats the educational bar of competence we’re competing with here at least nearly two decades ago. You think it’s gotten better or worse since then?

      • disregardable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        People do go to the Caribbean and Mexico, because they are within close travel distance. Most Americans could not afford a transatlantic vacation. You can take your whole family to Florida for a week just on the cost you’d spend on airfare going to Europe. It’s like $1000 per person per flight, 12 hour+ flight, 8+ hour time difference. A $10,000+ vacation is really not in the average American’s budget.

    • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah my high school said colleges would like for you to take a foreign language class, but it’s not required to graduate from here. Some students did think it was required to graduate and a couple I talked to at the time were surprised to learn I didn’t take any and still graduated.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      At my high school you needed 2 communication credits, foreign languages counted, so did drama, journalism, year book, cheer squad (this always puzzled me as it was not even a class), and others I am sure I am forgetting as it was 30ish years ago.

      • disregardable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        11 states have foreign language requirements, but really we shouldn’t even count them. A single 20-30 minute class per day is not going to achieve any proficiency in a foreign language. The only way for an American to actually achieve foreign language proficiency is to go to a 1/2 and 1/2 school.

        • nocturne@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I took 3 1/2 years of French in high school, but barely used it after graduation. I do wish we had more language learning in school.

          In elementary school half of our day was taught in Spanish, but an ignorant parent (my mother) complained so loudly that the project was scrapped after only a couple months.

          • stumu415@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because all you need to know is in the Bible. Earth is 6000 years old. Dinosaurs are an invention from the woke left. Jesus is white. That’s the curriculum for ya.

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It varies a lot from one school to another, at mine we did “block scheduling” so you had 4, 90 minute classes a day, and different classes 1st and 2nd semester

            Which had its pluses and minuses. You could definitely get a lot more instruction time in during a class that way

            But for something like a language, if you’re unlucky and your schedule works out that you had it first semester one year and second the next, you’re basically going a whole year where you may not have practiced those language skills.

            Other schools around me I think usually had 45 or 60 minute classes, but sometimes electives which might include language might have gotten shorter timeslots than core classes

          • igmelonh@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            No. My high school was 6 55-minute classes with 5 minute breaks between to get to your next class, plus a 45-minute lunch. 7 classes if you elected to take another class starting at 7am instead of the usual 8am. School was just under 8 hours long with 7 classes.

          • disregardable@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Consequence of “general education”. School is only 6 hours per day. Reading, math, science, history, and gym are all required. That’s 5. Want to add health, sex ed, art, music, foreign language, programming, speech and debate, driver’s ed? The more you add, the more you have to shorten the classes. My school had a lot of curricular options, so my classes were short. If a school has less to offer, they may have longer classes.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      7th grade? I never took a foreign language until 9th grade. I have two nephews, and both of them never took one until 10th.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not sure about other countries, but here in Norway, English lessons start in the 2nd grade. It wouldn’t surprise me if it’s similar in the rest of Europe.

      • bufalo1973@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In Spain there are places where two languages are taught at once since the first minute.  There are two official languages. And a third one is taught soon after that.

      • Waldelfe@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        English starts in 3rd grade here and a second language like French or Spanish usually in 5th grade. Starting to learn foreign languages in high school is wild.

      • grranibal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        In Portugal, mandatory English classes start on the 5th grade, but from 1st grade kids have the option to take English classes as an extracurricular

  • Spitefire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I honestly think it’s because in measures of distance, a US American could be considered well-traveled without ever having left the United States. Living in DC and visiting Florida or California is a big trip logistically. I love to travel and have moved a LOT and I have just barely been to every state in the US (some I only drove through, fuck rural Nebraska). While I disagree personally, I think that most Americans just don’t see the immediate utility in learning other languages.

    Not learning Spanish in school as a requirement at this point is just racism, though.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I grew up in the shittiest state and even we took Spanish. Middle school though. I’d say if we ever get through this racist fest, the basics of French, Spanish, and Chinese would be nice in elementary. Maybe with more advanced options for Spanish in later years since that’s our best chance for cultural immersion if they leave our Latina/Latino brothers and sisters alone for 5 seconds.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago
    • most people would find it useless, especially in areas not near any other country (most of the US)
    • other courses would need to be dropped or the school year expanded (not happening). The cost would also be in acquiring and retaining the talent on top of books and other materials
    • taxpayers would balk at this as they would also find it useless in most cases (why does our local welder need to Welsh to weld?)

    I am a huge fan of language learning and, if I had my way, would make all high school graduates take at least six months and live in some country very different to their own (including language) to get them out of the USAmerican bubble, but that certainly isn’t happening.

    I’m working on language number 5 myself (more if you count the ones I just tried to get to basic greetings, yes/no, etc. in).