“I’m just ashamed that this bill even came into fruition,” a Lexington council member said.

  • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The bill also gives people the ability to justify use of “defensive force” upon an unhoused person in instances of criminal trespass, including “unlawful camping” on the owner’s property. This would allow property owners to use deadly force against unhoused people on their property without facing criminal consequences.

    Sounds like Kyle Rittenhouse is gonna get his mom to drive him to Kentucky. Seriously though, this is fucking disgusting legislation. Homeless people are dehumanized enough but Kentucky is on the verge of legalizing hunting them for sport. What vile pieces of shit those 45 Republican co-sponsors are.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure! Then they can have an estate sale so they can recoup their “losses!”

        /s because I’m pretty sure it’s needed, sadly

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        What the smart psychopaths will do is march up to them with a gun and provoke the squatter to try to block it. Now they “fear for their life” and steadily force is justified. Pull a Rittenhouse.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is supposed to be absurd commentary but…it doesn’t even feel too far off

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    "Then he will say to those on his left, `Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ 44 "They also will answer, `Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ 45 "He will reply, `I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ 46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

    -Some Socialist Groomer Theater Kid

    I’d bet any amount of money that most of not all of this bill’s co-sponsors profess (at least surrounding election time) to a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and a striving to be more Christlike. And all of them seemingly impervious to cognitive dissonance.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m an atheist who believes strongly in separation of church and state, but I would dearly love for this to be appended to the law as an amendment. The place is already a theocratic nuthouse so might as well use that to do some good for a change.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This proposed law also has a three strikes law in it. Life in prison without parole for 3 felonies.

    Also, apparently child defendants aren’t allowed to have a jury? That’s not highlighted, so it’s current law there.

    This entire thing is an authoritarian wet dream. Create outlaws, and then turn them into slaves or bodies.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It also bans charitable organizations from paying more than $5000 in bail.

      For violent felonies, it doesn’t allow them to pay bail at all.

      Which means anyone could provoke anyone to violence and they would be jailed with no hope of escape. Including ostensibly a homeless person by destroying their stuff.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ya know the concept that one must take unreasonable actions in an unreasonable situation comes to mind. If someone gets into a fight for example, they may just default into “accidentally” killing the person so that they can write the narritive for example.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Making rash moves can easily backfire in times like these, better to take small precise moves than large random ones. In eliminating one threat you may create a martyr or galvanize ones enemies while weaking oneself. Just look at the German spartacists to see how well rash moves can backfire.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Who said anything about doing anything rash?

              🤔 Protesting in the major cities would probably do a lot to draw negative attention toward the bill and its sponsors, and hopefully get it dumped.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Children arent allowed to have juries in other states too. I got told repeatedly during my Juvenile case that children don’t have rights. They fucked me good for a miniscule amount of Marijuana. I’m talking, fucking years of my childhood. I don’t want to say the state because it might out my identity but I’ll give you a hint, its another shithole state that comes to mind when you think of fucking cousins, much like Kentucky. Glad to be out of that part of the country forever now.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Had similar late childhood. Put on probation for weed possession, then would get locked up for every minor infraction. A local police officer would follow me around whenever he saw me, make up excuses for pulling me over, and search my car. Got locked up for 6 months for being 30 minutes late to school once… because I got pulled over on the way to school. I’m guessing there was some kind of graft going on with the probation officers, judges, and detention centers, because they would give out such long sentences for such minor offenses.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You see, Republicans want to protect children so clearly they cannot be seen by a dangerous jury.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m really hoping there’s another area of law that says kids can’t be put in prison or if they are then they do need a jury.

        But realistically I’m waiting for the whole parenting responsibility of the state argument to drop.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was homeless just North of their border so the police here in Ohio set me up with a fake felony to keep me in jail. A dude stopped his truck in front of me while I was Doordashing, cornered me into a fist fight, and then told the police I hit him with my car. The people in the car behind me also backed him up. It never happened, so why was it so simple for me to be locked in jail indefinitely with my and lawyer telling me COVID suspended the fair and speedy trial? I cannot handle being in a noisy environment and have avoidant personality disorder, so I eventually caved to the plea deal. Now here I am nearly 2 years out with an ok job and my own place but I need to come up with $1100 before the end of the month for my fines or go back to court.

    I’m convinced they’re just trying to create a slave class. If you are an easy target, they’ll take you and mark your record so you have to be cheap labor for three upper class.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        I gotta say it.

        Ok Boomer.

        Society has failed everyone. It’s just that most people don’t see it.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m sorry but yeah your situation sucks if it’s true, but I don’t know really what you expect the court to do if there are multiple witnesses saying this happened.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Prove it. Can’t prove what didn’t happen? Apparently we now gotta indefinitely jail someone until they give up. /s

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I’m not saying indefinitely jail them, but that’s a serious accusation, and if there are witnesses then I can see why a jury would be convinced. Of course it’s ridiculous you didn’t get a speedy trial, but I think it’s pretty fair to jail someone over that accusation.

              • Mango@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                A jury wasn’t convinced. They wouldn’t let me have a jury. They wouldn’t let me in the court room until I agreed to their bullshit.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      How it is people could possibly believe in the legitimacy of legal systems knowing how they only make it easier for evil people to victimize others instead of protecting them is beyond me.

      I am so sorry for what you went through.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s easy. Nobody gets to see what actually happened. They see what Fox news tells them and nothing of what goes on in the Hamilton county jail. More than likely nobody is even interested. They either have their own problems or are comfortable enough im their life to think I deserved what I got. There’s even people who are such rent seekers that they think I deserved it simply by virtue of not paying to live in a house.

        Nobody is gonna help me except my roommate.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I admit there probably isn’t much anyone here can do either, but you have my sympathy, friend, and my understanding. Please, keep your head up. We are in tyranny right now, but we have to believe that the world will turn and things will get better. We have to believe, because that belief is the only thing that will keep us going so we can see that better world.

          We believe you and support you.

  • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like the biggest issue is what would amount to homeless corralling, and if they violated the law by living outside the designated zone, they’d be fined. The state knows they wouldn’t be able to pay, and thus 90+ days of prison labor.

    “The proposed legislation grants cities the authority to designate specific areas for unhoused individuals. If individuals are found outside of the designated area, residing in a tent, hut, temporary shelter, or vehicle with the intention to sleep, they may face misdemeanor charges, leading to a fine of $5,000 and a potential imprisonment of up to 90 days.”

    Don’t get me wrong, the deadly force bits are definitely worse, but I feel like what I quoted above is the true motivation.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your vehicle is your private property, so this is saying a legally parked person on their own private property who intends to fall asleep can be punished with a 5k fine and 90 days in jail.

      No more going out to your car over break to take a nap.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is a simple test to determine if someone is living in their car and in violation or taking a nap and legally ok.

        Do they look homeless or are they a minority? Also known as “White is right.” test or “You know porn or art when you see it.” test. No need to add additional training to properly enforce the law, previous transferrable training is standard.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I bet the creators of this law claim to be Christian & mistakenly think they are going to spend eternity in Heaven.

    It always amazes me that so many self-professed Christians have almost as much disrespect for their religion as I do.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Kill a person I don’t like… drag them into tent into my back yard… claim it was leagal deadly force against the unhoused on my land.

    The perfect murder.

  • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    And this is the most disgusting thing I’ve read today. The world’s moving in a great direction /s

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not that the unhoused deserve this–it’s vile, violent, and fascist.

    Not that this bill will pass, even in Kentucky, or be upheld by the courts, even in Kentucky.

    But the fact that this decriminalizes shooting homeless people for anyone means that 100% someone would use it to shoot their neighbor, probably on purpose, while claiming they thought he was homeless.

    • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The cynic in me sees this as a clear play to jostle the Overton Window. Sure this won’t pass, but will the people who suggested it face consequences? How much heat actually comes their way?

      Now they’ve checked the temperature and got away with it, they can try some other reprehensible thing and see if the backlash is manageable.

      Repeat until hell on earth.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      True. There are quite a few people who are actively looking for a legal loophole to kill someone. Preferably a minority, but they might not be that picky. You can find lots of these people on gun forums.

  • Rob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    The bill also gives people the ability to justify use of “defensive force” upon an unhoused person in instances of criminal trespass, including “unlawful camping” on the owner’s property. This would allow property owners to use deadly force against unhoused people on their property without facing criminal consequences.

    I hope this bill has some “defensive force” applied to it before it becomes a law.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hope the people who vote for this end up homeless, so they can experience “defensive force” personally.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Imagine if this passed.

        If you kick your SO out of your house, and they agree to leave, they’re now instantly unhoused, right? And your honor, they brought all their stuff and were sleeping on my property.

        Could landlords come in, swat style, and execute you the moment eviction procedures go through?

        If someone is not inside a house, are they not unhoused? If their house burned down 5 minutes ago they certainly no longer have a house. If anyone is not in sight of their house, they could plausibly be unhoused, whether they know it or not. Besides, there’s no way for you to know their housing status. So all campers on your property sound like fair game.

        What constitutes camping? Being inside a tent? Sleeping? Bringing stuff onto the property? If a company sets up a party tent at the wrong address, could you mow them down?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          They did define it in the law.

          But I don’t expect anyone who’d shoot a person for being homeless to read it.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            That reminds me of when I was a kid, and asked if I could see the book where they have all the laws. My parents were confused and looked at me like I was crazy

            I still think it’s absolutely insane that they can take away your freedom or your life for breaking rules that we learn through gossip

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    After reading the article, it’s 100% about creating a slavery pool. Murdering hobos is just icing on the cake.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    unconstitutional but since when have the “law and order” police not pissed on that piece of paper?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Pissing on the Constitution is what the dogwhistle “law and order” has always meant.