“There have been racial barriers, and it has been challenging to be accepted as Japanese.”

That’s what a tearful Carolina Shiino said in impeccable Japanese after she was crowned Miss Japan on Monday.

The 26-year-old model, who was born in Ukraine, moved to Japan at the age of five and was raised in Nagoya.

She is the first naturalised Japanese citizen to win the pageant, but her victory has re-ignited a debate on what it means to be Japanese.

While some recognised her victory as a “sign of the times”, others have said she does not look like what a “Miss Japan” should.

  • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    72
    ·
    10 months ago

    If someone were to look up images of a Japanese person, they would be very confused to find pictures of a white person. Yes they are Japanese culturally, but not physically or genetically. These are what the pageants are about, not everything needs to be inclusive of all aspects. It ruins the intents of it.

    • blipcast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It isn’t called a genetics pagent. Beauty is already subjective enough without layering your myopic view of race on top of it.

      • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It becomes genetic when you bring race into it “miss” “Japanese/japan” “Ukraine/ukrainian” they also have to show knowledge of their culture, race, language, etc. the beauty is a tiny fraction of it. But let’s make it the largest part of our argument….

        But hey, apparently I’m the myopic one….

        Call it the beauty pageant of Japan if you don’t want to bring anything but beauty into it… not up to them, do it yourself if you want to put your culture on them.

        • blipcast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, according to whatever panel was judging this competition, she had all of those things. But you weren’t talking about that. You said she isn’t “physically or genetically” Japanese, and that that was what “pagents are about”.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah yes, the futile desperation to maintain “racial purity”, because that’s never turned out badly for anyone ever… 🙄🙄🙄

      • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        How well did that work out for Native Americans…? They were so overtaken they were forgotten lmfao.

        Not everything needs to be whitewashed, just look at native Americans, they’ve already even forgotten and this happened to them. History repeats itself….

        They can always go and make their own inclusive pageant, instead of the reverse happening in every country. Since they are more or less forced to be inclusive and give up their heritage so they aren’t protested by people who don’t understand.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Removed, rule 5, and yeah, I’m removing the other comment too.

            Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

            • 520@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Have you considered maybe that the Japanese are nothing like the Native Americans, and that what’s happening in Japan has nothing to do with racism against the Japanese?

              • DessertStorms@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Right? They invoke the genocide of Native Americans to defend the idea of Japanese racial purity being threatened by a single beauty pageant contestant, and I’m the one whitewashing… 🤦‍♀️

                • 520@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  It’s absolutely insane, especially when it comes from those who claim to want to preserve ethnic identities.

                  If they’re gonna invoke other national identities in conversation, the least they could do is learn about them. If anything drawing comparisons to ethnic cleansing over a fucking beauty pageant is more insensitive than pretty much anything else in this thread.

                  Other than their connotations that someone cannot be a real Japanese because of their skin colour, that reminds me a bit about America’s history of treating black people.

                  • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I didn’t bring ethic cleansing Into the conversation…… that was their stretch and half from me talking about Native American pageants having to be presented that way.

                    Since American pageants are about non-native Americans now.

                    How you came to ethnic cleansing from that… fuck if I know, but it’s fallacious at best.

              • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                If you whitewash their culture as well they will be. Of course it’s different… until it isn’t anymore because of whitewashing….

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Removed, rule 5, and yeah, I’m removing the other comment too.

              Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

    • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What the heck are you talking about. Beauty pageants aren’t about ethnicity. This is farrrrr from the first time that a pageant winner is a different ethnicity than the predominant ethnicity of a country.

      • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes everything gets whitewashed and entire culture gets forced out again.

        Why is it that native Americans had to go and make their own pageant so they weren’t forgotten?

        “Japanese” means something, unlike American. When you hear Japanese, you don’t think white person, same with (Native) American. See how I had to specify so you know which? Same thing is happening with these pageants.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Oh fucking get over yourself.

          The Japanese are hardly an oppressed people, at least by outsiders. They’re a first world country. With their own customs and culture.

          The only dangers to their identity have been those of their own societal making.

          Japan’s native population has been in critical freefall for a long time not because of any white person interference, but because their culture has become increasingly incompatible with family life for a significant amount of their population. If you thought America had an out-of-whack work culture, your jaw would hit the floor when you see what salarymen and salarywomen over there go through.

          It’s not like they’ve been pushed out by a colonial force with some manifest destiny bullshit. The problem here simply isn’t whitey.

          • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yet they are being forced to accept outside culture since they wouldn’t be “inclusive”….

            It’s whitewashing and there’s nothing to get over, other than we need to stop pushing our cultures on others until there is nothing of their own left.

            Nothing to do with oppression, but of course fallacies help to make your agenda.

            • 520@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              They’re being forced, by nothing more than the mere reality of their situation, to accept outside culture because their societal failures have led to their own population death spiral.

              No one forced their hand or made them take on such damaging traditions and policies. No one is forcing the Japanese to take on elements of other cultures.

              Try doing a bit of research before spouting nonsense theories.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              They are being “forced” to accept outside culture because their inside culture has led them to a demographic death spiral. Not by any action initiated by outsiders. If outsiders were capable of forcing Japanese culture to change there are plenty of other things that would be changing that aren’t.

              They could always choose to continue following that spiral to oblivion, I suppose. Or they could reform the aspects of their culture that have led them there. Accepting immigration is one of the ways they could do that.

        • clgoh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          She’s culturally Japanese. Nothing is forced out.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              10 months ago

              Whitewashing… you keep using that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

              White washing means to attempt to change history to make something seem less bad than it actually was, or who someone was.

              Do you mean cultural appropriation? Though saying it like that kinda damns your point of view.

            • clgoh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              If she was of African origin, would it be whitewashing?

              • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                10 months ago

                There would have to be a term amalgamated, but by the essence of the definition, yes. You would be altering something in favor of another race/ethnicity.

                • yuriy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Oh golly, please amalgamate a term for it right now. You’re clearly the best person for the job with your enlightened (read: narrow) view of race.

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Removed under rule 5:

                    Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

                  • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    It’s racist for pointing out that “Japanese” means something? “(Native) American” means something? And to bring white washing to light?

                    The hypocrites on Lemmy is astounding…