• Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Probably a terrible idea, but melting the plastic and extruding the plastic in underground abandoned mines, filling up the empty spaces like icing on a cake from floor to ceiling. There are abandoned lead mines in Oklahoma, where the town was vacated because of the toxicity and the ground collapsing underneath. A place like that seems ideal.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      30 days ago

      In Finland one mine had broken the law and dumped all their waste in the back of the mine and they were ordered to clean it up and they raised their hands up and said they couldn’t because it was too dangerous to work there. Govenment’s mining superviser dude turned out to be paid by the mining company, surprise!

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      That assumes the plastic is already being collected, so why not just make new products from it instead of dumping it into the ground and then using even more oil to make new plastic?

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      30 days ago

      In my area they don’t recycle glass. I was so surprised when I moved here and learned that. Glass and aluminum are the two most worth it/possible afaik.

  • cashmaggot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    I worked at a university at one point in my life, and they were quite proud about their recycling plan. The janitors though, would just take the trash and the recycling and put the two bags together and throw them both away. I never really lived anywhere that recycled outside of the West Coast. But is it actually being recycled here? Is this the 9%?

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      custodian checking in: if your university is anything like the school i work in, custodians are dumping it in the trash because nobody seems to know what can be recycled and the staff fill their recycle cans with trash. it’s not worth the time picking through it to salvage what you can.

      most of the stuff in the recycle bins in the rooms i clean cannot be recycled. food wrappers, Kleenex, etc. it’s a sham meant to make people feel better about themselves

      • cashmaggot@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        I always figured it was just because it was a sham as a whole and they didn’t really give a puck and nobody ever seemingly was watching them. Thank you for your input though, this is good stuff =)

        • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          it’s possible they also didn’t care, but we do recycle the best we can in our district :)

          • cashmaggot@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Oh yeah, I feel that too. Also feel your nickname ;D!

            I think a lot of people who are just trying to survive never really cared that much about a lot of things - recycling included.

            *Mind you, I know you can also get paid some solid $$$ for being a custodian cause I dated one and she made bank ass bucks.

            • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              more people should consider being a school district custodian imo. i get health benefits, all federal holidays and weekends off, a union and a pension (yes, a pension. not 401k)… it’s hard work if you do it right, but can’t beat it for the benefits as an entry level job

              • cashmaggot@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                Y, I had an adopted papi (rip) by the by (as in found family) and he was a custodian too before he retired. And he worked at a hospital and did very well for himself. I guess one more is that I knew a guy who once was attending university, dropped out and now sweeps floors for a living and he’s WAY happier doing that than keeping up with the joneses like you have to do at a private university. I myself have worked all sorts of gigs, and enjoy a solid sweeping or three =)!

                One last one, little sneak in here - in that I have always been good at flitting too and fro and some of my favorite people to talk to growing up were custodians, because they were like the invisible folks of the school but depending on if I was “in hiding” or “visible” I could always find comfort and fun stories with the custodians =)!

                My buddy is a TA, and does well for themselves even though they struggled for years to find a place to fit in. People always talk about what a nightmare it is to be in the school system but I know a handful of people who really love it. I think you’ve got to just be a realist in this department. Either way, high-five =)!

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      I feel like the bulk of the plastic that gets recycled is done in other developed countries that spend significant money on doing it. Like when I lived in Japan they were very stringent about separating your trash, same thing in Germany, and not for nothing those economies that do recycling at scale generally prefer glass over plastic because recycling glass is more efficient.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    I have gradually wondered if the issue has not been in our obsession with plastic specifically, but our need for sanitation of every object. “We need a material that will preserve its shape in transit and operation; but we then want it to gently break down into nature when we’re done with it.” No matter what materials of what strength we invent, that’s always going to be an oxymoron. There’s a reason people criticize biodegradable materials as often falling apart.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure medicine has made tremendous advances through the preservation of sealed instruments and drugs, especially for those with sensitive immune systems. But the 3000% thorough sanitization we keep of every single object we interact with has had a very gradual impact on our planet. I kind of want to envision just how fatal of a health risk it would carry if so much of our food wasn’t triple-secure-wrapped, and whether that’s comparable to the current impact of widespread plastic.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      We’re always trying to optimize and reduce loss/waste. Being able to have food sit on shelves for months without oxidizing or rotting has been a huge improvement in terms of food loss but it requires these biounavailable materials. If we use compostable materials for packaging then the clock starts ticking on them and storage facilities need to maintain stricter standards (i.e. keep humidity down).

      The medical aspect is a big issue. You see what is consumed in an ER and surgery and then multiply that by a million/day and you wonder how much of this trash is being produced. Lawsuits over every little medical issue don’t help reduce this. Fishing industry waste is another big issue for the oceans.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      No, the problem has never been us at all. We don’t run Coca Cola Co. We don’t decide how laundry detergent is packaged. We don’t manufacture excess plastic drums and lined tanks for unnecesary use cases. We don’t flood the market with cheap dinnerware, plates, cups, bowls, etc.

      Big corporations do all of that. Run by dozens of people who do not care what we think.

    • tpihkal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      30 days ago

      I want to hate your comment so much but reality is reality.

      Plastics just don’t really get recycled. Despite the efforts made (the company I work for included), recycling is such a joke because it’s hard to even FIND sources that WILL recycle certain things because at the end of the day it likely doesn’t exist because it’s more expensive and sometimes has an even greater impact on the environment to recycle than to just keep buggering on.

      That said, I don’t like you burning plastics. I grew up burning paper trash in barrels but we were still mindful of not releasing toxic fumes into the local environment. So, fuck you for that one.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’ll be honest, that’s actually more than I would have guessed (ballpark would have been 5% or under), sad as that is.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’ll bet the term recycled is actually open for interpretation, and the official use differs from our (pleb) expectations.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    Almost like plastics recycling has been a scam all along perpetrated by the corporations to greenwash their business.

    Reduce, then reuse, and if the other two cannot occur; recycle.

    • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      30 days ago

      This is absolutely correct but still not the whole story. Recycling for glass and aluminum and steel can be done essentially infinitely creating a largely closed loop (though for glass in particular we really need to return to our old reuse practices). By using the same language for plastic as we do for better recycling methods we still make plastic recycling sound better than it is, even when reduction and reuse are emphasized.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        30 days ago

        I imagine that goes the other way, too: by conflating the scam of plastics recycling with recycling in general, some people are probably discouraged from recycling anything at all, including aluminum.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        30 days ago

        Plus the whole system was created with the idea of getting people used to recycling so when better, more efficient forms of recycling came into use, people would already be recycling.

        Too bad that whole “better, more efficient” part never really happened.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    29 days ago

    not to mention it doesn’t matter where it goes, most plastic can’t be recycled or is not efficient to recycle it. Really need to just not use plastic as a whole

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Right? Why do gatorade and pedialyte bottles have to be in crazy over engineered compared to cheap crinkly water bottles? Both one time use which isn’t ideal but thinner bottles would save the company money right?

      I wonder if it’s a psychology thing, like having a high quality bottle means people thing whatever is inside is equally higher quality?

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Easy in principle, tough in practice. Plastics are extremely useful in a huge range of applications.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    Recycling was the last in the list of what to do.

    The problem is we forgot about Reduce and Reuse… The two most important things.

    We use way too much instead.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      30 days ago

      9% is only recycled once, only 1% has been truly reused multiple times, so you’re close enough.

      Also:

      Of the remaining waste, 12% was incinerated and 79% was either sent to landfills or lost to the environment as pollution.

      They’re the same thing. Incinerated is lost as pollution, it just happened to have one more use on the way there.

      And I just realized, this wikipedia page linked is almost 10 years out of date!

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        And I just realized, this wikipedia page linked is almost 10 years out of date!

        You know what must be done.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        30 days ago

        Incinerated plastic releases green house gases and some amount of micro plastics in the uncombusted ash.

        Landfill plastic seemingly just erodes into micro plastics over long time scales.

  • randompasta@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    The recycling symbol for plastics was a great bit of marketing for the plastics industry. ‘Just buy a new thing and no worries you can just recycle it.’

    Future geologists are going to see a marine deposit of plastic and be able to date exactly the age of the rock layer.

    • echolalia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      30 days ago

      Survivors of the resource wars will send their children to the plastic mines to work for bottle caps

    • makingrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Don’t forget nuclear fallout. There’s even a term for when humans started to irrevocably fuck Earth: the Anthropocene.

      • weariedfae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        30 days ago

        The committee recently pulled the plug on the Anthropocene unfortunately. It was never official and they just rejected it this year.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Yeah, I feel like this Wikipedia graphic puts it quite well why that was rejected:

          You see that “Pleistocene” vertical bar? And you see that tiny sliver of “Holocene” at the top. Yeah, the Anthropocene folks were basically arguing that so many riveting things happened in the Holocene already, that we need to declare a new epoch for what’s happening now.

          Besides, if we do continue to irrevocably fuck Earth and the current mass extinction event continues to wipe out a big chunk of life on Earth, then a future sentient species might declare our entire existence as just the geological event that ended the current era (Cenozoic).