Summary

Trump’s transition team is reportedly mired in infighting at Mar-a-Lago, with factions clashing over control and strategy for his return to the White House.

The Washington Post detailed heated disputes, including shouting matches, name-calling, and physical altercations.

Three key factions have emerged: one led by Donald Trump Jr. and JD Vance, another by Trump ally Susie Wiles, and a third by Linda McMahon.

High-profile confrontations involve figures like Boris Epshteyn, Elon Musk, and Vance, highlighting tensions over Cabinet picks and leaks, further fracturing the team.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      It’s an overlooked way to combat fascism. Get them to eat each other in a corner rather than taking out their rampant sexual frustrations on the rest of us.

      • Fontasia@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        27 days ago

        The fall of the Berlin wall can be largely attributed to a boarder guard getting pissed at all his higher ups being at a party celebrating 40 years of the USSR and refusing to return phone calls (amongst hundreds of other improbabilities occurring on the same evening)

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’ll only stall. Eventually, one rule of thought will win out even if it takes months of firings and cycling out of people he already appointed.

        Eventually, they’ll settle out.

        • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          27 days ago

          That’s what happened in his first term (and apparently within his business for years). Trump’s management style appears to be: gather sycophants and yes men, orchestrate drama to pit everyone against each other, stay in power due to the instability caused by the infighting. No one considers challenging the king if the court is too chaotic.

  • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    28 days ago

    In other words; a bunch of ultra wealthy nepo-babies with the IQ/EQ comparable to the average 14 year old boy are hanging out at a luxury country club deciding the future of our nation, and despite having collectively been in the game for almost a decade, they still have no idea what they’re doing.

    We’ve come full circle, back to the “founding fathers” in terms of letting the wealthy few decide our future, yet our modern cast of wealthy few are wealthy fools who likely wouldn’t survive a week without their personal assistants.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Because they actually have policy and aren’t egotistical maniacs struggling for power for powers sake.

        Last time Dems had control they passed comprehensive healthcare. The GOP gave themselves a tax cut.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Lol. Dems are ruled by corporations that are after power for power’s sake. They dont even try to hide it.

          Did you not see Harris proudly declaring that she supports fracking and Israel??

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          in one side, we have pedophiles, con artists, actual nazis, etc. On the other side, we have people who failed to convince the county that they were less bad than the opposition, and were completely incapable of holding literal trators to justice.

          I’m coming around to the “both sides” argument. I’ll still vote blue, assuming we even have another election again, because fuck the fascists and 3rd party is a waste of a vote, but deer fuck the dems need to figure their shit out and fast.

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            ? Those two parties are both pro nuclear and pro carbon extraction. Literally the two biggest existential threats to live on this planet, they’re running towards

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          You make it sound like there’s only two parties. But, yeah, all the parties that are hell bent on pursuing existential threats to the planet are going to loose votes.

  • whithom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    28 days ago

    Hopefully they just tear themselves apart from the inside and everyone just bails and we can have another election with some decent fucking candidates.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        It’s worth watching CGP Grey’s video on The Rules for Rulers. In it he explains why allies of the new rulers are tossed out when the old rulers are deposed. What makes a person good at grabbing power doesn’t necessarily make them good at keeping it.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        It consolidates it, but that means the in-group is smaller. Fascisim is a death cult in the long run as it has to keep everyone focused on an enemy, but they have to invent a new enemy if they defeat that one.

        https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

        For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle. Thus pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. It is bad because life is permanent warfare. This, however, brings about an Armageddon complex. Since enemies have to be defeated, there must be a final battle, after which the movement will have control of the world. But such a “final solution” implies a further era of peace, a Golden Age, which contradicts the principle of permanent war. No fascist leader has ever succeeded in solving this predicament.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Except, if I am getting what you are saying right, no. That would make things worse. That would result in President Vance and if you got rid of President Vance, you get President Johnson.

        To quote Jello Biafra, “I’d rather have a dumb Nazi than a smart Nazi.”

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          Only if Trump and Vance were gone at the same time. President Vance would immediately choose a VP.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          27 days ago

          The part that saves it is that Vance can’t generate the kind of support that Trump does. He’d definitely fuck stuff up, but fascism is so much about The Guy that anybody but Trump would not be able to build militant support. That is, the kind that makes reporters afraid to say anything bad about the Administration.

          • Gumby@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            Which would be great for an election, but once the Republicans are already in power, they’ll just continue to fall in line.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            I hope you’re right because I think that the chances of Trump making it to the end of his four-year term are slim. I don’t know that it will be assassination, but I think he will either just die of old age or, more likely, they use the 25th to get rid of him when his dementia gets so advanced that he can’t even read from a teleprompter, let alone say anything off-the-cuff.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              27 days ago

              Did some math on the Social Security Admin actuarial tables a bit ago. For a 79 year old man, he has a 30% chance of just keeling off on his own in the next 4 years. Probably higher than that, because he’s not in good health and eats a lot of McDonalds.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Hey you know what we could put in there? It’s a huge empty space dude! You could totally put a trampoline in there!

    Just jump in thru one ear, bounce and jump out the other! He would be non the wiser! I’m surprised he walks around and says things.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    28 days ago

    Trump promised the social media nutjob faction, the corrupt billionaire faction, and the low-brow entertainment faction that they’d each get to call all the shots. Kinda awkward when they all get in the same room together.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is why the Media helped Trump win. So they will have endless stories like this.

        • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          Maybe not for him, as he’s not a traditional late night host, but for the rest of them, definitely. It’s all they talked about for four years.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            28 days ago

            Because it was all they COULD talk about for 4 years. He monopolized the media landscape, pushing out much better material left and right.

            Besides, being funny about something that’s already both a joke and a tragedy is NOT anywhere near as easy as you might think.

            Especially not when millions of people will send you death threats if you go to far and millions of people will stop watching if you go too easy.

            And that’s not even mentioning the real possibility that he might make mocking him illegal.

            • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              28 days ago

              No need to bootlick talk show hosts. There is always plenty going on in the world. They choose to discuss him every night. To say that’s all they could talk about is gross hyperbole. They are lazy. The writers are lazy. Trump is some of the lowest hanging fruit in the last 50 years.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                No need to bootlick talk show hosts

                If that’s what you think was going on, I hesitate to read the rest of your comment… 🤦

                There is always plenty going on in the world

                Yeah, but talk show hosts have to stay relevant. They have to make jokes about what people are talking about.

                What people are talking about is mainly determined about what legacy media covers and what goes viral on social media.

                If both are dominated by whatever bullshit the Mango Mussolini is doing, the talk shows gotta talk about what the Mango Mussolini is doing.

                To say that’s all they could talk about is gross hyperbole

                No, it’s exaggeration for simplicity to make a point without getting bogged down in irrelevant details

                They choose to discuss him every night.

                THAT’S hyperbole, though. Hypocrisy too, by the looks of it.

                They are lazy. The writers are lazy

                More hypocrisy with your lazy and narrow minded jumping to conclusions 🙄

                I was right. I shouldn’t have read on.

                • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  28 days ago

                  The fact that you’re defending late night talk show hosts so hard is odd. Do you work for one of the shows?

                  No one is putting a gun to their head and forcing them to discus the orange man. It’s a choice. This can’t be argued.

    • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      28 days ago

      I hated it so much last time. Too stressful. When Biden won in 2020 it felt like a weight was lifted off me.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      I see a lot of takes like “The media learned nothing from 2016/2020.”

      My enby in Christ, our blessed ever perfect capitalism means they can NEVER ‘learn’ or even ‘care’ about what is best for the country. It will only ever be about the click$.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    28 days ago

    Media companies have realized what foreign governments have known for years. If you want all the inside knowledge of what goes on in the Trump White House, send a spy to Mar-a-lago. You don’t need clandestine agents when Trump and his crew discuss all this stuff openly, and all you have to do is pay to get in.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Hell, the dipshits willingly talked to the Watergate guy who ended up writing a book about it (instead of actually telling people about the shit, because that doesn’t make you money).

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        What? Woodward and Bernstein were told about the investigation by an associate director of the FBI.

        It was already a crime being investigated by the FBI before the articles. Deep Throat was a high ranking FBI agent.

        Some of yall need to read a little history if you’re going to base opinions on it because everything you said is wrong.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          I think he’s talking the more recent stuff in which donvict’s people talked to Woodward, but Woodward held all that information from the American people, only to release it in a book later…

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      couldn’t win an election

      Yeah that’ll happen when your populace is largely morons who vote for someone who proposed tariffs as a way to lower prices. Yep always the evil Democrats causing everyone to be such morons.

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        28 days ago

        The same people that boycotted a better deal because they weren’t able to understand 1/3 > 1/4.

        Education important. School good.

        • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          It would appear that what you advocate for would be even more beneficial to the bunches of morons. What’s more embarrassing and impotent than giving up?

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Giving up what? The dems were never more poised then they were this election to end trump for good. They failed. There is no comeback. They haven’t even done the work to figure out where they went wrong. They are a sunk cost and for you to put your political energy into this party is a complete waste.

            Welcome to the decent into authoritarianism. The longer it takes you to snap out of this delusion that the dems are going to save you the sooner we can mount a real counter.

            • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              All of these nihilistic takes never quite seem to address the elephant in the room, which is that it’s easier to score from 3rd base than 1st. You can whine that our politicians don’t place our choice issues as their number one because of money, but ignorance of the party that wants to wind the clock back is looming 100% of the time, so your arguments are moot for people living in reality. Objectively, the best thing you can do for improving the party is to vote in Democratic primaries or run for office. Do you think people like Rashida Talib aren’t doing enough either? It’s funny you mention delusions, as if everyone here is like, “I voted, so I’m done for 2-4 years” while being active on political news. In other words, if anyone is reading your take, it automatically doesn’t apply to them.

              There are many lessons to be learned for the Democrats here, I think it’s too early to tell if they’ve learned anything. Yelling at them with constructive advice is still more important than doomering on a forum.

              • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                Nihilism, to me, is to put faith in the democrats who will lose thier fucking hat to fascists and never feel a bit of shame. That’s nihilism.

                I’ve given them 8 fucking years to get their shit together and what happen. Biden who said he wouldn’t run again drug his feet and shoved kamala through. That is not strategy, that’s a throw. Your fucking insane looking back at this and not seeing how the democrats took the goodwill of kind hearted people only to roll over and die when it mattered most.

                I’m pragmatic, I’ll always put my vote where it needs to go. I can not give the DNC any ounce of support and I will not be looking for any wins from them any time soon. The damage is done. What the GOP are reaping cannot be undone in 2 years. 4 years. I’d venture 100. Especially when the democrats come out with a showing like this.

                • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  “Faith” is clearly the misunderstanding you have here. You don’t choose to drive on the right side of the road because you have Faith you’ll get home safe, you do it because if you drive head-on into traffic, you’ll die. The “Faith” is that the alternative is worse. Are you arguing that the Republicans aren’t worse? Or that everyone reading your post voting for a shitty third party that does virtually no local elections would have led to a better outcome? We have no Faith the Democrats will do good, that’s why we need to shout at them and improve the party with, perhaps maybe our own membership. Where is that energy better directed oh wise sage?

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        No, you’re wrong to blame the voters.

        Dems could have ran a candidate that appealed to voters, but instead opted for the same corporate shills as always. Dems could have campaigned on massively popular populist policies like paid family leave, raising the minimum wage, or Medicare for all - things which would directly improve the material living conditions of the working class. Their donors didn’t allow them to, and their corruption ensured their obedience. Once again, not learning the lesson, and once again, losing in historic fashion.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Didn’t read this. I will always blame people who revel in ignorance and destroy their country for the love of ignorance

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            As in, ignorance of popular policies and effective messaging being necessary to win an election?

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    27 days ago

    This happened throughout his first term as well as within the Trump Organization before he sought public office. His management style seems to be one where the boss pits everyone against each other to keep all would-be dethroners at bay. It’s not the best way to distribute the keys of power, but it is a good way to keep anyone from challenging the leader even in the slightest.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      27 days ago

      This is exactly how Hitler ran his government. People think the Nazis were hyper-efficient. In truth the German reputation of being a highly regimented and strict society well predates the Nazis, the Nazis themselves were highly disorganized and really inefficient in most everything they did.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Nazis came into power in the early 1930s. It required them to lose a major war in 1945 and the death of their cult leader before they stood down.

        It appears that one of our greatest mistakes was allowing the Nazis to become a comedy trope (like the Producers), showing them as incompetent buffoons. In reality, they were a decade-long threat that made the world extremely uncomfortable. Nazis don’t fall over just because they’re “the bad guys”, and outside of some more-powerful superpower rising up and kicking their ass its not so clear how to make them fall.


        That being said: Trump and the MAGAs are NOT Nazis and thank god for that. They are Americans and ultimately I tie them closer to the Know Nothings or Whigs.

        The Presidents of the 1800s caused major atrocities over the Native Americans, and the USA then had a century of anti-Native American / bad-guy Indian savages to deal with. Of course, we won those battles so it wasn’t such a big deal but the atrocities remain a black spot in our moral history. Given the trajectory of what we’re witnessing here, I expect a similar thing for MAGA.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          27 days ago

          Turning the Nazis into a comedy trope was something that predated WW2. There were people who actively mocked the Nazis because they thought their pomp and rallies were ridicules.

          Post-WW2 they received more humanizing depictions than the Soviets ever had. The comedy trope as you mentioned didn’t really start until the 1960s with Hogan’s Heroes that portrayed the Nazis as utter buffoons. The Producers was made by Mel Brooks, who made it his life’s mission to turn Hitler into a figure of mockery and ridicule.

          The reason why he did that is because he believed that by making Hitler look like the ultimate comedic jackass, no one would ever take Hitler and his ideology seriously ever again. He did have a point. His satires of Hitler were never co-opted by Nazis, who frequently co-op anti-Nazi satire and propaganda as their own (look at American History X. It is a serious critique of white supremacy, but the protagonist’s handsome and muscular appearance and his attitude turned him into a Neo-Nazi icon).

          The main issue is that people don’t understand why Hitler was evil, why Hitler was dumb, and more over… how similar Hitler was to many other third-world dictators and tyrants that we condemn without a second thought. It was that he inherited the German state, which was far more advanced technologically and economically than other countries and thus actually stood a chance at doing the crazy shit they set out to do.

          Mussolini had wide ambitions, but they were not targetted at Western European powers, and also he seriously lacked the capabilities of carrying out his ambitions (his attempt at wooing the Muslim world over to his side failed in a comical fashion). This is why Mussolini is often remembered as a goofball idiot and not the tyrant that he actually was towards his fellow Italians. Mussolini’s family was not tarnished by his misdeeds and have been active in Italian politics. His great-grandchildren hold office and are still running and no one seems to care much for it there.

          It was also very well-known that when fascism comes to American it will not resemble the Nazis in Nazi Germany. Sinclair Lewis noted that in his 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here that fascism will come in an American guise. HE is misquoted as saying that it will come carrying a cross and wrapped in an American flag. He didn’t say that, but he definitely meant it.

          The same thing is going on in Germany, with the AfD rising in power and might even be able to take office. It won’t be like Germany in the 1930s and 40s, but it will be a Neo-Nazi state.