• OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember in 2012 how everyone was horrified when an authoritarian government like China forced everyone to disclose their identities to get online so they could track and censor them?

    Now the authoritarians are here.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The joke of the China comparison was that we had a bunch of libertarians screaming “We can’t have social services! The government will weaponize them against us and track everything we say and do!!! Public healthcare, public transit, public education, public utilities - they’re all a slippery slope to the Police State, just like in China!

      And now we get all the same mass surveillance via privatized channels, while libertarians seem to have fully clammed up (when they aren’t quietly cheering on psychopaths like RFK Jr). But we get none of the public amenities. Yay… love my Freedom™

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hey, we wouldn’t want young people to know that they’re being propagandized by the state of Israel to ignore a genocide, would we? Let’s block them from informing themselves under the guise of “protecting” them from porn, which they’ll still be able to get to from shadier websites that bombard them with malware. Yeah, that’s the solution.

    Politicians are so out of touch. Also, all zionists can rot in hell.

    • Case@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, politicians are way out of touch. On every level.

      For Zionists… well, that just sounds like genocide with extra steps… You’d think the Jewish diaspora would be against genocide, but here we are.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’d think the Jewish diaspora would be against genocide, but here we are.

        They’re like the parents who abuses their kids because that’s how they were raised.

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    We’re gonna be sending AI generated photos to AI powered age verifiers to read AI generated articles about the latest developments in AI.

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nah no problems here. Move along but before you do please leave a copy of your government id.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sounds like it’s time for those subreddits to find new homes on non-UK instances of Lemmy.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      All kinds of governments are rushing to implement something similar. The Fediverse solves some problems, but not the problem of a site being hosted in a single geographical location (and thus a single government’s jurisdiction). To help with this there are tools like i2p that can obscure a site’s hosting location, and there’s also work on distributed web hosting, but the latter still seems to be in its early stages. One day maybe we’ll have distributed websites that can be resilient against censorship.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Whaddaya mean? A non-UK instance doesn’t have to comply with UK law if it doesn’t operate as an entity in the UK and so it won’t require the face ID for UK visitors. So long as the instance is okay with hosting this content, it would let UK visitors view it. For example, I don’t think the UK has authority or mechanism to ask a Brazil-based instance to do this.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sure but that means they have to have a mechanism, legal and material to execute this. There must be an gov’t institution that looks for and designates sites to be blocked. Then they have to have legal power to compel UK ISPs to block those lists. Are these things part of this law? I haven’t read enough.

            • then_three_more@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              As I understand it if a site doesn’t comply and fineing them isn’t an option Ofcom can apply for a court order to, indeed, compell ISPs to block them.

              • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Okay. Yeah that makes sense and in that case hosting on the Fediverse out of the UK would probably unblock it for a long time. If the blocking is not trivial - like one person adding a URL to a list - then they’d have to prioritize and they’d likely be going over bigger fish like international porn sites and such for a long time before they reach communities on the Fediverse that may or may not be self-designated NSFW. If they’re on Reddit on the other hand, they get voluntarily blocked by the platform itself in the UK almost certainly without direction from Ofcom.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      3 days ago

      because citizens ringing their digits to express concerns means so much more to them than their donors ringing them

      • SoupBrick@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Cool, are you doing anything in the real world to try to make a positive change or just shitting on people who are?

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I heard that some of the checks require video of the person performing particular movements. So a little harder to fake with AI.

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        There are video deepfake systems that can animate these fictional faces. We need a catalogue of the kinds of facial positions these systems ask for

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          One of them that is hard is waving your hand in front of your face. It trips up almost every deepfake system I’ve seen. That’s a common test we’ve had to start using with interviewees because they’d try to game the system.

          • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I guess in that case you could do the following, though it is a bit of work:

            1. Learn what actions are supposed to be taken in the demand for selfie identification

            2. Record a video of yourself performing the actions, but not with your hand moving in front of your face for that section

            3. Record a different video of just your hand moving past the camera

            4. Deepfake the face video

            5. Composite the video of the hand over top of the deep fake video with chroma/luma keying

            6. Use virtual webcam software to play back the video into the actual demand for selfie identification

            Wouldn’t work if a real human being is there asking, but should work for a known set of instructions ahead of time that is being audited by software.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s crazy that we have website that are just outlets for war gore to begin with. The “solution” to the social rot that is monetization of war pornography appears to be adding a bunch of faces to a big database marked “Adult”, I guess?

    Who does this even benefit, other than data warehousing and aggregation companies?

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t call it outlets for war gore. It is also about providing information that mainstream media refuses to give or intentionally distort to fit its narrative.

  • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Infuriating and horrifying in a way that triggers my claustrophobia. Even more infuriating are the people in America who are begging for censorship. You point out what a trash heap Europe’s censorship is and they shrug, as long as the censorship is by them against the “other side” whichever side that is they have no concept of what happens when that “other side” gets a hold of the reins. I would rather have to sift through 10 feet of nazi posts than have the government have a way to legitimately hold a verified list of everything everybody does.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the kids can’t see the horrors of war [crimes], they’re more likely to be convinced of being participants.

    • GeriatricGambino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reddit blocks you plain and simple if you use a vpn, and has done so for a while. Also I don’t see how VPN relates to them gatekeeping 2 subs behind a mandatory doxxing of yourself.

      • Bobo The Great@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you use a vpn you appear as a non-uk user, you don’t have to show the ID. If you don’t have an existing account, the only reliable source of geolocation for websites is your ip address, so a vpn can effectively circumvent that.

        • GeriatricGambino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh, right. I didn’t thought of that at all, I never went beyond "well, they don’t let you use VPNs anyway. Man I need to sleep. And thanks for explaining.

      • HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Reddit blocks you plain and simple if you use a vpn

        Not really true. Some VPN IPs are blocked, so you’d have to select a new VPN endpoint and try again.

        Source: have done this multiple times when switching VPN endpoints.

        • GeriatricGambino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Huh, just went and managed to get the frontpage after 5 tries with mullvad. To be fair haven’t really tried too hard to go back on Reddit the last two years, and just assumed the blocking of IPs was stricker. Still, thanks for correcting me

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Just visited with my personal VPN, which I’d advocate anyone with technical chops to spin up. Digital Ocean droplet, been in use for years with zero maintenance, $6/mo., and no one gets my logs.