• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It should be remembered that SEVERAL grand juries initially declined to charge the defendant, despite the ironic traditional reputation of grand juries to “indict a ham sandwich.” But they kept going back. They were determined to destroy this citizen.

    Obviously, they eventually prevailed, got the Sandwich Assassin into a courtroom, where the “victim” proceeded to blatantly lie in open court:

    Lairmore had testified that the sandwich “exploded all over” his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. But a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Lairmore in his bulletproof vest.

    What fucking drama queen LIAR. He should be charged with perjury.

    Also, the jurors had sandwiches for lunch. I’m surprised the Trump lawyers didn’t try for a mistrial on the grounds that lunch was prejudicial.

    I feel bad for the guy for losing a perfectly good sandwich.

    Fucking ICE losers.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I agree completely.

      Eventually we’ll have a new administration. Would you be in favor of going after ICE agents and other bad actors from Trump’s term? Or would that be unnecessary retribution?

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        We are in this position because we declined to go hard on Civil War traitors and Nazis. This time, we have to slam the lid so hard on these psychopaths, that whoever doesn’t end up in prison, or executed, will slither bank under their slimy rocks and stay there.

        And then we have to reconfigure our entire History and Social Studies curriculum to include the true history of the Right, with special emphasis on the Treason of MAGAs and the Republican responsibility for their rise. Even private schools should be forced to adopt that curriculum if they expect to remain open.

        That way, when they try to emerge again in the future, we will recognize them for what scum they are, and brutalize them again until they decide that their rocks weren’t so bad after all.

    • sgnl@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That first paragraph, do you have a source for that?

      I tried to find proof and all I could find was that the grand jury that was hearing it as a felony refused to indict, so the prosecutors went with a misdemeanor that doesn’t require a grand jury indictment.

      There were a few OTHER instances of grand juries refusing to indict other people accused on assaulting federal officers, but those were unrelated to the incident in question.

      I’m not even sure it’s legal (…not that legality matters to this regime, I know) to shop grand juries … like that first paragraph implied, is it?

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Here’s the dumb AI synopsis, but it adds sources:

        A grand jury rejected the felony charge against the “sandwich thrower,” Sean Dunn, three times before prosecutors dropped the felony charge and pursued a misdemeanor. The grand jury in Washington D.C. twice refused to indict him on felony assault charges, and the third time they did so as well, according to CNBC and The Washington Post. Three rejections: Federal prosecutors failed to convince a grand jury to indict Dunn on felony assault charges on three separate occasions. Outcome of rejections: After the third rejection, prosecutors reduced the charge to a misdemeanor, which does not require a grand jury indictment. Final verdict: Dunn was later acquitted of the misdemeanor charge in a trial.

        So they tried to indict him by Grand Jury three times, who rejected them. Then they downgraded the charge so they wouldn’t need a Grand Jury, and then they lost that case, too.

        It seemed like when it was all over, the jurors agreed that the ICE cop crying about getting hit with a sandwich in his bulletproof vest was big whiney baby who should just FUCK OFF!

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Something tells me this guy was pretty fed up with his employer anyway. Probably figured if he was going to get DOGEd, it might as well be for a reason. I’d wear that shit like a badge of honor, literally. They altered the Banksy art to show a guy throwing a sandwich, and I would put that on a T-shirt, and wear it everywhere - “Look! That’s ME!”

        I own a business, and if that guy applied, I’d hire him instantly, even if he wasn’t qualified. I can always train anybody (except 2, that’s another story), but this guy is obviously a man of character, and that’s always welcome in my world.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    364
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Lairmore had testified that the sandwich “exploded all over” his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. But a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Lairmore in his bulletproof vest.

    So he perjured himself, then? Surely something’s going to come of that? No? Huh, okay, then.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But you don’t understand! He felt the impact of the sandwich through his body armor!

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      So I was on a jury. The officer involved testified on some things that made it sound very bad for the defendant.

      Then we saw the body cam of part the interaction. Technically what he said was true but extremely exaggerated. Made us discount everything he said that wasn’t on video.

      We ended thinking the defendant was probably guilty but they didn’t prove it so we decided not guilty.

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Thats how the jury i was on went but it was before body cams. Basically they said dude was “exchanging small packages for money” implying he was dealing drugs. The cops claimed he tossed the “small packages” when he drove off. They never collected these “small packages” so how do i know what they were?

        We all thought dude was probably guilty but that the police work was too shoddy to convict. Cop looked pissed on the way out of court.

    • mikenurre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      104
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      He also claimed he felt it through his Kevlar vest. Didn’t know sandwiches are more powerful than bullets.

    • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Cops do it constantly. TBH I’d chalk that level of bullshit up to them constantly using ChatGPT to write their reports now, except that they’ve been pulling the same bullshit forever and getting away with it nearly every single time.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I firmly believe that police officer testimony that can’t be backed up by bodycam footage shouldn’t even be admissible. There’s essentially no reason for a cop to not have their bodycam turned on at all times unless they specifically chose to turn it off, so there’s no reason we should have to accept testimony without it.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’d take it a step further and say that police testimony without body cam footage should be outright exculpatory. If the prosecutor is allowing a cop to testify without also trying to admit the footage, it should be grounds for the defense to get the charges dismissed with prejudice.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Wasn’t there a case of police officers badly beating someone and then claiming his blood stains on their uniforms were destruction of police property or some such?

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          My neighbor was a retired cop turned gun dealer. One time while I was chatting with him, he mentioned that back in the 70’s and 80’s, he and his buddies used to claim “the defendant violently groined me in the knee, causing injury” on their police reports. In other words, they’d knee someone in the crotch, then say the person attacked them with their groin.

        • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’m not aware of that specific case, but yeah that tracks. I’ve read about incidents where the cops were enraged about things like victims of traffic accidents or assaults by officers being soaked in blood, getting it on them, and stating that they ‘didn’t want to risk getting hepatitis/AIDS’ as justification for declining to provide lifesaving medical intervention. In some cases, the delay in care led to deaths, while they stood by, and weren’t censured by their departments.

          They’ve been using seizures from acute health incidents and tazers both as justification for escalation of force because “suspects were resisting” for quite a while.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I actually just learned at work the other day that everyone who is a first responder as part of their job and therefore may be exposed to blood borne pathogens is required by OSHA to be offered a full Hepatitis B vaccination paid for entirely by the employer.

            These officers claiming they don’t want to risk Hep B either declined a free vaccination and therefore created that risk for themselves or they’re fully vaccinated and just making excuses to not do their job

            • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              Agreed, they know the risks and should know better, but that’s what the situation has come to in some jurisdictions where it’s impossible to keep on qualified personnel for (relatively) low salaries. “You get what you pay for” incarnate.

          • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            officers […] stating that they ‘didn’t want to risk getting hepatitis/AIDS’ as justification for declining to provide lifesaving medical intervention.

            Motherfucker, if you’re first aid/CPR trained, you are supposed to have appropriate PPE with or near you while on your job that will see you encounter such situations. If you don’t, that’s negligence on your part, and if you’re just choosing not to use it so you don’t have to get involved, you need to be taken off that job.

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Jesus Christ. Wikipedia has his last words. They’re spoilered in case you don’t want your day ruined

              Last Words

              According to body cam audio, these were McClain’s last words as he was restrained by police officers: "I can’t breathe. I have my ID right here. My name is Elijah McClain. That’s my house. I was just going home. I’m an introvert. I’m just different. That’s all. I’m so sorry. I have no gun. I don’t do that stuff. I don’t do any fighting. Why are you attacking me? I don’t even kill flies! I don’t eat meat! But I don’t judge people, I don’t judge people who do eat meat. Forgive me. All I was trying to do was become better. I will do it. I will do anything. Sacrifice my identity, I’ll do it. You all are phenomenal. You are beautiful and I love you. Try to forgive me. I’m a mood Gemini. I’m sorry. I’m so sorry. Ow, that really hurt! You are all very strong. Teamwork makes the dream work. [after vomiting] Oh, I’m sorry, I wasn’t trying to do that. I just can’t breathe correctly.

            • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Fuck, that was so brutal. Even given what I’ve learned about cops over the years, this case is particularly egregious, that poor fucking kid was murdered by pigs and paramedics with fucking ketamine of all things.

              • manxu@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Everything about that case was horrifying, from the Koncerned Karen that called the police because he was being too Black on the street to the fact authorities tried to sweep the whole thing under the rug. The cops responsible even went to do selfies mocking Elijah on the anniversary of his death and a violin vigil was disbanded as if it were a looter mob after an earthquake.

                And this to a human being that played the violin for shelter cats because they seemed to enjoy it. Elijah’s soul was so beautiful, it breaks my heart that he’s gone.

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I can only hope to have such grace and kindness in my heart when the fascists kill me.

              • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Fuck grace and kindness, at least enucleate their eye. Getting murdered IRL isn’t like in books, TV series or movies, you don’t just fall down like a sack of grain. It hurts the whole time, don’t forgive someone who’s trying to do it to you.

    • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      it is actually worth pursuing that…
      even just posting comments about that on every news video about it on youtube would help.
      we have a rare combination of undeniable, clear video evidence vs. sworn testimony in court that is unambiguously a lie.
      There’s no real wiggle room on that.
      Why not call prosecutors and annoy them? Or send letters to the judge?

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You can’t really perjure someones opinions or recollections, only a direct and provable lie. He says the sandwich ‘exploded’ and he could smell sandwich contents. He probably got some amount of sauce or something on him, even if he didn’t, photographs can’t prove with any certainty it did or did not happen and you certainly can’t disprove he could smell onions and mustard.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Border Patrol Officer Greg Lairmore received two “gag gifts” related to the incident — a plush sandwich and a patch featuring a cartoon of Dunn throwing the sandwich with the words “Felony Footlong” — which the defense team argued showed this was not a serious event in his life.

    That is amazing.

    • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s actually pretty insane that this has happened, what, twice now in only a few weeks, both cases related to the fed occupations. I can’t even remember the last time an acquittal like this happened before that, though I don’t follow this stuff closely. I think OJ is the last one I’m aware of but that’s obviously a totally different situation. I was definitely expecting s different outcome, but good for him. I remember in the video they called him “Superman”, lol. I guess so!

      • beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They didn’t even say if the sandwich had ketchup or mustard in it. The combination can make a big difference in how the crime should be treated. What if it had Mayo! Has anyone stopped to think about that?

    • tamal3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My education is in the works. Is this actually an example of jury nullification? Like, what he did was actually illegal, but the jury presumably, thought the law was unjust? Or is throwing a sandwich at ICE just not illegal?

      • Inucune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        17 hours ago

        He threw an object in hostility at a (supposed) federal employee, which could be assault. Jury said no, because they can.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It is, by the letter of the law, assault (and battery, if that’s a separate thing there). But the jury is not bound in any way as to whether they find a defendant guilty or not guilty.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          There was a pretty locally big felony murder case. Some Norteños jumped some Sureños. The Norteños had bats. One of the Sureños had a gun. One of the Norteños died.

          Now, under stone principle I don’t understand and can’t remember what it’s called, when you start committing a crime, any crimes that occur as a direct consequence are attributable to the party that began the illegal actions. So the Norteños went on trial for felony murder for shooting their own fellow gang member (since the Sureños could reasonably argue self defense and the DA wanted to do something about gang violence, they prosecuted the Norteños) even though a Sureño pulled the trigger.

          I learned it’s difficult to get a conviction from a fair jury for felony murder when you “started it”. They were acquitted.

      • higgsboson@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Not a lawyer but my reading of it is that, in other context, this fact pattern could theoretically lead to a conviction. It is hard to imagine a sandwich causing actual harm, though, so it is probably unethical to have even brought charges knowing it is such bullshit.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The fact that this guy had to go to court at all to defend himself is just asinine. These dumb fascist fucks are a bunch of thin skinned bullies.

    • PostaL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Have no worries… If the current Reich has its way, and so far it seems it has, they’ll not have to go to court anymore…

      Straight to jail meme

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Not really sure its because they are thin skinned. Its part of the facist playbook. You have to make an example of anyone that steps out of line.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I’m not referring to any specific legislation, more the concept. It’s designed to discourage people from participating in the legal system at all.

            • shane@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              SLAPP is designed to prevent people like Trump from using the legal system to silence and otherwise harm critics.

              • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I’m pretty sure he is talking about the concept it represents where the corrupt justice system is now being overly punitive in a attempt to silence the public. Same thing just no similar law to control the prosecution.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is clearly judicial harrassment … this prosecutor is now likely to lose his job. If sandwich guy is smart he will sue about 4-5 different people/groups.

      DC is practicing Jury Nullification … wondering if the Juries there would steamroll these lawsuits forward.

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This was a HUGE waste of OUR hard earned tax dollars. This should NEVER have gone to trial. I’m embarrassed to call myself an American.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Any time the prosecution wasted on this is time not spent on something else

      I’m sorry you had to waste your time, but thank you for your service sub sandwich guy 🫡

      • freshcow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Good point! If they are going to use up our resources anyways, its probably best they are as inefficient and incompetent as possible. Plus, there’s the added benefit that the prosecutor and agency have further damaged their credibility - possible ammo for future defense cases.