If audible differences were present, they failed to provide reliable markers for identification. And although a slight listener preference for the banana recordings emerged, it didn’t correlate with accuracy.
Hell yes, 2026 the year of banana hi-fi meta 🤘
I bought and installed Monster cables for my fairly high end (Not audiophile) HiFi setup in the 80s. Oxygen free copper yada yada. It’s true that they are fat conductors (good), very flexible sheathing (good), transparent (cool), but I could have saved a bunch by using fat plain electrical cables.
My experience with cables is that they do matter, especially on the interconnect side, but price has very little to do with the perceived difference in fidelity or sound signature.
As for interference and shielding, yes this can indeed make a difference, but it’s rarely an issue unless we are trying to measure the noise floor, or using a really weirdly balanced levels. (like very quiet source attached to an amp that is cranked to max)
The noise floor only really matters when you’re watching A Quiet Place
What about trying to listen to 4’33"?
The article is interesting, and I would not spend the crazy amounts that some people do on cables, but cable quality does still matter.
First of all, the article says that one area it definitely does make a difference is:
Interference-prone environments: Poorly shielded cables can pick up interference, affecting signal quality. However, these tests show a broader point. Detecting audible differences is surprisingly difficult when visual cues, price, and expectation are removed. Without context or labels, even ridiculous conductors fail to produce reliably noticeable changes.
However, the tests arent testing for interference at all. They’re performed openly on a desk without much around, but it then goes on to conclude:
If wet mud and bananas don’t degrade the signal in ways listeners can detect, then subtle improvements from expensive cables are even less likely to be audible. In other words, the threshold for hearing real differences is far higher than marketing often implies.
Like yes, there is obviously marketing hype, especially if buying a name brand cable, but the quality of shielding legitimately can make a difference, especially if you’re running it alongside power cables / extension cords.
The other factor that can make a difference, has nothing to do with audio quality but just physical convenience, in that pure Copper cables will be more expensive, but thinner and more flexible, then Copper Clad Aluminum (CCA). CCA is cheaper, and if your runs are static and unmoving there’s zero issue with it, but if you’re moving your speakers around a bunch, the stiffness compared to copper can be annoying.
CCA cables break if they are moved a lot. I’ve had trouble with CCA ethernet cables breaking.
Audiophiles when they can’t tell the difference between lossless and 320kbps mp3:
me listening to music I encoded at ~90 kbps opus
Because all those materials are shit. Only deoxydised copper with gold coating will be ok, more or less! Barbarians!
Gold!? Oh boy, where to even start …
Silver is a far superior conductor, and everyone knows about the “skin effect” in wires. So obviously you want silver coated solid core copper. That’s not even getting into all the other factors involved in proper cable selection.
I recommend these cables for the entry level audiophile.
But the current, and therefore signal, goes on the outer side of the conductor, so you suggest the signal to go through unevenly rusted silver instead of unoxidizing in normal circumstances gold?
According to the people that make the £70,470.00 speaker wires: yes.
I only use gold plated banana entwined with meteorite iron, thank you very much. Everything else is just a waste of sound.
Mmmm gold plated banana entwined with meteorite iron
And optical cables need to be gold plated. Basic audiophile knowledge.
make sure your optical cables are properly magnetized / demagnetized, too
if the cables are running in a north/south direction you want them magnetized with oblong polarity to the Earth’s magnetic field, but if they’re east/west they shouldn’t be magnetized at all to avoid Maxwell-Gauss feedback loops
Not unless you’ve had a swami bless it, or you may as well not have bothered.
Nonono, only literal pure gold will ever transmit sound acceptably. If your cables are light enough to still be picked up by humans, they dont contain enough gold.
Are you part Dwarf?
Perhaps 🪨⛏
I’m pretty certain most will unironically say this. Or hold this up as proof that you shouldn’t use a consumer level interface because you can’t even distinguish mud from banana.
Over the years my relative has spent allot of money on these non balanced audio cables. Every time he ‘upgrades’ he says it sounds so much better. I hear no difference. Then he puts the volume up so my ears hurt and asks if i can hear it. I just smile at that point.
When I was like 4 years old, our neighbor had a fancy sound system he showed off to us. Next time he was at our house, I walked over to our TV to show him it could do the same thing, by just turning it up really loud.
I figure it’s like I used to feel that my engine ran smother after getting an oil change. The brain is weird and can’t be trusted.
Are we making banana phone happen?
What could it cost, ten dollars?
Ring ring ring ring ring……
Wait Can I be the conductor? Wireless is cool but Bluetooth is kinda iffy.
Technically! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_conduction
(Disclaimer: I know this isn’t what you meant, but the wordplay is fun)
Depends. Are you a banana?
I’m more of a potato.
Then you can be a battery
I am a meat popscicle
Fun fact, the French version of this line translates to “I am a clothes moth wearing a sweater”. It’s kind of a classic too.
Anything can be a conductor if the signal is strong enough
No
Banana.
Yes!
Things melt FYI
Let em >:)
To prove that I’m correct? But I already know I am
You lost me man, hope you’re having a nice day :)
deleted by creator
