• Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Good on them, but I Wonder why they can’t just build on top of something open source like Nextcloud.

    It already has the majority of the Office-365 suite

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Because the French government is hell bent on saving money, but they don’t care about anyone’s privacy at all. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are building a privacy nightmare system here. Having said that, at least they are removing Microslop, and anything that could potentially hurt Microslop in any way, shape or form, is a good thing.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Visio and W…

    They need to open up naming to public vote.

    Cally McCallface

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The French use “Visio” kinda like a generic term to talk about a video call (short for visio-conférence), I find that much better already than that W nonsense.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      These particular news are based and a long-term good for the humanity. Moving from spying corpo slop to an open-source solution is a win-win for the french people. Sad that it is only happening now, this should have been done decades ago, the US empire and its corporations have always been evil. Now they are just showing their true face to europe and the US population.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s a bit more complicated but essentially only a third support him, a third oppose, and a third are either too stupid to know what side to choose or too lazy to do anything. In my opinion it’s this third camp that are the worst of the worst. At least the Trumpers are doing what they think is right, these guys are just lazy and willing to just let anything happen to them as long as they can watch Netflix and buy Funko pops.

    • Pungent Llama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Shows the importance of having a proper primary process. Biden fucked up and dropped out of the race way too late for any democratic candidate to have time to build up hype and momentum. Just being the VP shouldn’t make one an automatic default candidate. Harris did pretty bad during the Primary back in 2020, she just was not popular and didn’t inspire enough people to go vote.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Harris could have won, when she first announced, and then picked the left candidate for VP, her popularity skyrocketed, then cratered as she embraced the policies that had just killed the Biden campaign.

        A democrat cannot win on “we’re going to be Republicans, but more competent”.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can’t they invest in standardized SIP solutions? Linphone is already French.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      SIP used different signalling protocols amongst other things than WebRTC, and i imagine browser support is a hard requirement

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Anything to ANYTHING to get away from MicrSlop, Google etc. is huge. HUGE!

  • mikenurre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    230
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Once these countries leave, they’ll never go back. And then the rest of us get better alternatives to this enshitification model.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      While I would love to see them never going back, here in Germany, all it takes is some corrupt politician taking a huge bribe from a lobbyist and swoosh, they are back to Microslop.

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Seriously, enshitification is the only thing US companies do well these days. They just dig deeper moats around their walled gardens because they’re too greedy to make decent products that people actually want.

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think enshitification is a product of public traded companies promising infinite growth, not necessarily a problem of US only companies.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s also a consequence of low taxes on capital gains and corporate profits.

          When those taxes were higher it made more sense to reinvest the profits back into your own company. You’d build a reputation and a structure that would pay out you and your family for a hundred years.

          Now the dream is to build up a company just enough to sell it to some megacorp and cash out asap, with you and your family living off of investment money that only increases over time.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Once these countries leave, they’ll never go back.

      Look up LiMux and the massive Microsoft deal that followed.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, please stop with this garbage misinformation. Microsoft made a (suspected) under the table deal with the Munich government at the time to setup a Microsoft office in Munich if they switched back to Windows.

        That’s what the news reported on endlessly. That’s the narrative that keeps getting falsely repeated over and over, and no one ever checks the BS stories they spread.

        The rest of the story didn’t make headlines, where the new incoming Munich government said “hell no!” (prob in German) and continued the Linux rollout.

        Today the environment is a mix of Linux and Windows, but they already have a large focus on FOSS software.

        Despite the astonishingly stupid decision to roll their own in-house distro (LiMux), the program was massively successful, with Linux users filling only 40% the number of tickets the Windows users did.

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Im not an expert on this, but it seems like Ms was worried that success of Limux would be the drip that starts the trickle so to speak. It made sense for them to do whatever it took to patch that leak.

        Things have really changed since then though. Valve has been very successful in a Linux end user environment, and Eu is becoming disenfranchised from the US rather than Microsoft specifically.

        I think Munich’s motivations were financial, but Frances will be ideological.

        With these things in mind, the calculus has changed. That doesn’t necessarily mean France won’t fail, but id be surprised if Microsoft pursues them in the same way.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Don’t listen to that other commenter. They’re wrong about the Munich LiMux story. It keeps getting repeated but it’s not correct.

      • Bababasti@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That deal that totally had nothing to do with Microsoft relocating their headquarters closer to Munich

  • BromSwolligans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s great. I wish Visio/Vizio were not such common names for software and hardware. We done did those already. Do something else.

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Came to comment this. I know there are only so many letters, and so many combinations of 4-8 of them, but can we quit naming new things with the name of an old thing?

      Finding any details about France’s Visio is going to be a cluster.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Now replace Windows with Linux, and fucking invest into not needing to use American-controlled CPUs as every single one of them contains a backdoor.

    I don’t understand why governments trust official matters in the hands of closed source software and suspicious hardware. Even China uses a special version of Windows 11 in public computers, this is nuts.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      China has been working intensely for at least 2 decades to catch up, and they are still about a decade behind!

      Netherlands has ASML which is a huge advantage for European independent manufacturing, but even with that it’s an insanely expensive investment to make a realistic competitor to AMD, Intel, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom because they have loads of patents that are hard to avoid.
      Chip production is a global enterprise, and even USA isn’t independent anymore. They depend on ASML and TSMC for their most popular products in AI, Smartphones, servers, laptops and desktops. And more and more Arm is taking over from Intel/AMD.

      What we may be able to do would be using Arm and have TSMC help us with manufacturing. But to make such a project succeed is not an easy thing, we had European computer companies in the 70’s and 80’s that were heavily subsidized by governments that dominated home markets for several European countries, and they essentially all failed against international competition.
      So what we risk if we were required to use a European product funded by EU/European governments would be to have to use an overpriced under-performing technology, that would be a millstone around the neck of all of Europe.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        they have loads of patents that are hard to avoid

        China doesn’t care about patents of outsiders.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Seems to me that it’s time for the rest of the world to invalidate US IP and go from there.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And the rules based international order has been exposed as the wink during a handshake deal. Who cares about patent law?

      • shrugs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        He is talking about software. A fucking video conferencing tool not controlled by American tech is no ASML level investment.

        We could at least start with this

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Here’s my guess, and I could be completely wrong.

      All the governments use 2 sets of computers. The first, is a closed network used only internally. Open source, connected as a network, but NOT connected to outside neteorks. This uses closed source OS that they themselves develop. No backdoors. Highly secured.

      The second set is what you know. Windows 11, backdoors, easily spied on. Intentionally left open, because that’s their way to spy on the other countries.

      They leave this open, to let themselves be spied on, so that they can spy on the other side. Neither side realizing they’re both doing the same thing, and both sides just getting mostly useless info.

      Then, to throw off the trail of it being useless info, they occasionally allow a juicy bit of info into their windows computer. Just so it’s not obvious that this isn’t the real info.

      I have zero evidence, and came up with this theory after reading your comment. So I could be very wrong.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Ignorance, mostly. It’s sad but Chinese leaders seem to listen to their experts, while EU leaders listen to CEOs, and of large companies only.

  • CactusEcho@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Why not jitsi meet? Isn’t better to use an already “established” opensource conferencing tool?

    They could just selfhost their instance.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They’ve been building an entire open source suite of software tailored to their needs. If I had to guess, Jitsi isn’t performant enough for large (100+) user meetings in a way they can scale easily. It’s a great tool, but it seems better geared towards smaller loads. Video conferencing at scale is a pretty big challenge.

      Between this, their new Docs platform and some Matrix-based chat platforms, I think this is something they’ve put a fair bit of thought into how they want to build. Overall, it’s a cool initiative, but I think it’s pretty clear that it’s open source as a means to be transparent as a government organization rather than to form a platform for broad use by everyone. They do have some self-hosting instructions on their GitHub though.

      • phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I was wondering the same, but this does make sense.

        At the same time, it might also make sense to build on top of existing FOSS tooling rather than building new, but I suppose that depends on where the bottlenecks are and if stuff like proprietary codecs might be involved

    • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Jitsi is owned by a Campbell, California based firm called 8x8. Source: I worked for them during the acquisition.

      Though admittedly avoiding US origin open source is unlikely to be possible

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Visio? Don’t they have to pay for copyright on the name “Visio” to Microsoft?