A draft emergency executive order to declare a national emergency to allow President Donald Trump to take unprecedented control over voting is being circulated by anti-voting activists who said they are in coordination with the White House.

Voting rights experts, democracy advocates, and at least one state election chief said Trump doesn’t have the authority to claim such powers — and any attempt would be blatantly unconstitutional.

The draft order — which is said to be based on a conspiracy theory that China interfered with the 2020 election — would allow Trump to unilaterally ban mail-in ballots and voting machines on the basis that they are susceptible to foreign interference.

The order comes from MAGA activists who have been coordinating with the White House. One of the advocates for the order is Peter Ticktin, the attorney for Tina Peters, the former GOP Colorado county clerk who is currently serving a nine-year state prison sentence for her role in a 2021 voting system breach, in an attempt to find voter fraud based on election conspiracies.

The Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution explicitly gives states — not the president — sole authority over elections.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      If we wanna be technical, there’s nothing to do. They can saber rattle, but until the executive order is signed, there’s not really much to do. It’s already illegal, so working towards making it illegal is silly.

      There’s also the fact that even if he signed it, congress wouldn’t really play a part in what comes next. It would get struck down by the courts, make its way to the Supreme Court, and then who the fuck knows.

      Now, do I think the republican majority congress would actually stop it if given the choice? Not likely.

    • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Funny, because anti-voting activists seems to describe a good chunk of the db0 community these days.

      Then again, maybe it’s more fitting than ironic after all.

  • Robonauta@piefed.co.za
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Certainly THIS illegal act will be the one that makes the justice wake up, and not just another one swept under the rug because “akshually, the president cannot do crime” - as per SCOTUS

      • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This is my hard limit of taking up arms. IDK about you guys but I think bypassing an election to steal a third or more terms is blatant tyranny and should kick off a revolution.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Seriously though, if this doesn’t get a lot of people up in arms, nothing will improve for generations. If people accept tyranny, they will continue to get tyranny. Simple as.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution explicitly gives states — not the president — sole authority over elections.

    For this very fucking reason.

    • jontree255@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The Constitution is as strong as the paper it’s written on.

      As OP stated. SCOTUS is captured by a complicit majority that wants a right wing theocracy.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The 6 corrupt Supreme Court justices have shown that waving a copy of the Constitution lightly over their rulings is close enough for them. They’ve made it very clear that states have no real authority over elections by forcing them to include Trump on their ballots after he clearly incited an insurrection.

      Our laws and Constitution are meaningless with this Supreme Court.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As a Constitution Loving QAnon believer who HATES Pedophiles AND Corruption I APPLAUD the President, who Raped Children with Jeffrey Epstein, taking UNCONSTITUTIONAL Control of Elections!

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      It really is anticlimactic.

      We get an honest to god pedo conspiracy and a federal powergrab, and the response from factions who dedicated entire lives to warning about this as loud as they can is… “Eh?”

      • Kraiden@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        the world

        I know it may feel that way, but I assure you, the rest of the world is watching the US right now like this:

        wtf.gif

        • Joeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          This is one of those times I would support another country kidnapping a president just like our government has done…

          Freedom of speech is basically not even a thing any more, the chance that someone shows up to my door for saying this is not 0 like it should be.

          Its crazy, what these people are allowed to get away with and the fact that the democrats are not saying so every day as loud as they can just like these fools have done constantly in the past… says a lot about the whole situation.

          Its frustrating beyond belief and it always seems to be getting worse.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Good point. Issue isn’t with him taking over blue states. It’ll be with him doing this in red states preventing representation of for blue districts. We’ll see Atlanta with 0 democrats elected.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That “blatantly illegal” part should be a key part of every headline dealing with this anti-American treachery.

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Isn’t the title of the post false?

    The headline is “Anti-voting activists co-ordinating with White House on blatantly illegal draft emergency order to take control of elections”, and by all accounts it seems to be some group of far right activist cranks who are circulating the “order” and not the WH?