• tover153@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My doctor was very glad when I adopted a new dog after mine had died 18 months before. I have a good doctor.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Does this dog buff stack? If I get 5 dogs, wil? I have a ~100 % immunity for the next ten years? Is there a cooldown? /j

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Does the size of dog affect the buff? The average dog gives 24%, but does a 200lbs mastiff give more than a 4lbs chihuahua? Less?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People likely to die in 10 years probably don’t often choose to adopt dogs.

    • smh@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m not so confident. My grandma got a dog to fill the hole in her life left by my grandpa’s death. Nine years later I inherited a dog. (TBH, she was already on the deep slide into dementia when Grandpa died and losing her partner of 5 decades didn’t help.)

      What I’m saying is old folks sometimes do things we wouldn’t expect.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 hours ago
    1. walking dogs is good exercise.

    2. dogs are excellent security and help reduce certain anxieties.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve had dogs. We would love a dog. Unfortunately, we believe our work & travel schedule is detrimental to having a pooch.

    Work = we’re both gone about 12hrs per day Mon-Thrs.

    Travel = at least one 3 day weekend away per month. And about 4 vacations away per year.

    And retirement isn’t on the horizon. For now, we’ll stick with our kitty.

  • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    There was a study a while back that associated grip strength with one’s grip on sanity, and many people confused the cause. If someone has something to do, they’ll have stronger hands. If they have a healthy diet that supports their physique, they’ll have stronger hands. If they lack a debilitating injury or disability, they’ll have stronger hands. If they have ambient time to devote to exercise, they’ll have stronger hands.

    Unequivocally do I love my dog, but I try to avoid conflating associated privileges with results.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Just riffing off the headline here, but owning a dog is directly associated with engaging in the act of walking a dog, and walking is pretty well established to be good for overall health. There’s no reason to assume there isn’t causation when there very well could be

    • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Soft hands typed that post.

      I’ve already made arrangements with the local kill shelter to give me fifty dogs that were scheduled for execution. This weekend I’m going to the city to visit hospice facilities, to save some lives, two at a time.

      • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Since I’ve just read the headline and they are always the peak of the important information I was just going to get myself 100 dogs making myself 240% less likely to die making me immortal for 10 years.

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    People who drink wine live longer.

    It’s not the wine that’s extending people’s lives, it’s the healthcare and lower stress from having enough money to afford wine.

      • 18107@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A random magazine comparing average lifespan of different countries.

        Another possible explanation would be that most of the high lifespan countries had universal healthcare.

        I doubt any efforts went into fact checking as the magazine just used the fact to promote wine drinking.

        • Yliaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That… doesn’t sound very compelling.

          Alcoholism is associated with disease and death, and wine is just another form of alcohol.

          • 18107@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s correct. It’s an example of why assuming that “correlation = causation” can lead to some bad decisions.

            Drinking wine and living longer are correlated, but it is not likely that one causes the other. It is more likely that there is something else (such as disposable income) that causes both.

            In a similar way, ice-cream sales and drownings peak at the same time every year. The ice-cream is not causing people to drown, and neither are drowning people buying a significant amount of ice-cream. Both can be attributed to the higher temperatures of summer.

            • Yliaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah, I remember reading in my psych textbook that ice cream consumption was correlated with homicidal behaviour, which is obviously not causal.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Presumably it’d be multiplicitive, not additive. Each one decreases your risk by a relative 24%. The first makes it 86%, the second makes it 74%, the third makes it 64%, etc. You get diminishing returns for each dog you add.