• blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, I do legitimately wonder how he did this when other administrations didn’t or couldn’t. Would like an insider perspective. Like, did he just pay tons and tons of OT? Did he order the potholes filled quickly, even if they didn’t meet the normal standard for quality? Did he crack the whip and say “fuck your union rules!” Or were past administrations just this corrupt/lazy/incompetent?

    I’m sure his fanboys will say “obviously it’s the last one - he’s not a corrupt capitalist pig”, or something. And I’m open to that explaination. But I’d like, yaknow, some actual statements from people who were actually involved.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      EDIT 2: See Aatube’s comment below for the NYT article link. It’s real.


      I mean, I do legitimately wonder how he did this when other administrations didn’t or couldn’t.

      I suspect the article is overselling it (the comparison, not the raw pothole number), and they don’t source basically anything they’re saying, so it’s hard to definitively call them on that. NYC had a winter that created an abnormal number of potholes, and this article (using an uncited figure) says: “the same number that would usually take New York’s Department of Transport (DOT) a week.” But is that for filling potholes directly after winter? Is it for the rate of potholes per week averaged across the year (which would be a completely invalid comparison)? I guess I could try digging it up, but Novara Media clearly didn’t give enough of a shit when they said it.

      I think it’s cool regardless.

      Donate one hour’s wage per month—or whatever you can afford—today.

      Dunno, Novara; maybe when you decide to learn how hyperlinks work.


      EDIT: I tried to follow one breadcrumb to the NYT using this quote from the article: “According to the New York Times, the incident signaled early on that Mamdani was raring to take on “long ignored street improvements – the kind of meat-and-potatoes issue that some previous mayors have struggled to deliver on”.”.

      I can’t find that quote, even trying several different verbatim excerpts from the quote (but the full quote should be findable anyway). Thaaaaaaaat’s really fucking questionable. I could be missing something. @return2ozma@lemmy.world, your thoughts?

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      The question is, how many potholes do they usually fill in a day? For all we know they fill 8000 potholes every spring, but just don’t advertise it. That being said, letting the people know what you do for them is important.

    • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s possible they’re all fresh new potholes. The reason there’s more of them is the trend from cars to SUVs.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The first part makes sense. But I think an especially harsh winter would be more the culprit than SUVs. Not that they don’t cause more damage - but the number of SUVs in a city doesnt double in a single year and cause a noticeable increase in potholes. We would expect a gradual increase in pothole development that would only be noticeable with statistical analysis over several uyears.

        • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re totally right. I didn’t know it was such a big jump. I assumed this was one of those cases where every administration gets to claim something is the “biggest ever” because the thing they’re bragging about tends to grow steadily with population and/or inflation.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I mean, totally possible. But it looks like he just got a lucky break with the weather this year, lol

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But I’d like, yaknow, some actual statements from people who were actually involved.

      He said, asking on Lemmy, where none of those people are likely to exist.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure. But a future article or other news source or maybe a former mayor’s aide’s twitter account might have more info, and maybe someone here knows about that

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, my question was how it managed to do its job better than previous administrations.

        Analysis elsewhere in the thread appears to indicate that none of my hypotheses were actually the most likely scenario. Instead, (and I’m embarassed I didn’t think of this) the most obvious hypothesis is that the DOT is filling potholes at a completely normal rate, and there are just a lot of potholes available to fill. They are comparing filling potholes on the pothole-filling-est day of the year after a harsh winter, versus an average week after average winters in previous administrations.

        So, as always, the null hypothesis when a politician says something should be “it’s spin”