• stumu415@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    How shit are the streets in the US? Everyone in the comments are bitching about their holes.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It depends. Northern roads go through a lot of freezing and thawing, water leaks into the cracks, freezes, expands, breaks up the roadway, cars/trucks roll over them and breaks it up more, and the next thing you know there’s a rim denting hole in the road. You can patch them all day long, and others will open up right next to them.

      Down south, where it’s warmer, the roads last much better. I’m in Florida, and the roads are generally pretty great, and when people visit America, most of them go to Florida, so that’s what they know.

      Just to be clear, I am not defending or praising the Florida government which is probably the most corrupt state government in the nation. The roads are good because the weather is good, not because of the government. They suck.

  • poop@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    wow, its almost like socialism can benefit society.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean this really isn’t socialism this is just basic general government work and somebody actually pushing for the people that do the work that they’re being paid to do already.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        So true. Governments have lost sight that they exist to serve the people. They are a collectivist solution to managing large projects the population needs. You can take many approaches to that, but that is the fundamental reason we have them.

        Otherwise, we don’t need them and wouldn’t choose to have them.

      • poop@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was more alluding to the fact that he is a socialist and his interest is in bettering the city rather then enriching himself.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Every good Mayor does this. There is nothing unique or ultra special about him doing his job.

          • poop@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I agree that a good mayor does stuff like this. But with the state of american politics in general, and NYC in particular, this kind of behavior is far from the norm. Otherwise this post wouldn’t get any traction.

            • Auth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              This is exactly the norm. New York politicans are always doing bursts of road maintance and bragging and trying to outdo the previous one. I checked the last 15 years and found every single mayor did this. Not all of them filled in more than the previous which is why there is stats like Filled in X by X date or filled in X in a single day or filled in X over the term.

              I like Mamdami but I also like living in reality I also think presenting this as Mamdami is the first guy to fill in potholes completely undermines peoples trust in the government. I am happy to be shown im wrong and that this is exceptional but from what I see its nothing more than a good headline.

                • Auth@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  No people are actually acting like hes the first guy to fill potholes. There are so many comments saying “omg why could not one else do this” “omg a government actually working for people”. I am correcting the record to show governments do this

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        At the very least it is evidence that socialists can govern at least as well as capitalists.

        • titanicx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean honestly that’s just kind of a dumb take. Regardless of him being socialist or not the fact is he’s just doing his job.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sure, but there a shit ton of people who say that because he’s a socialist, everything will go to hell. It’s important to counter that argument with facts that show otherwise.

        • Birch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          In the entire fucking rest of the world Mamdani would just be viewed as a boring centrist bureaucrat that does their job. But “spending money on public infrastructure” is somehow seen as radical left socialism in the US.

        • titanicx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean we have many countries that prove that aspect we don’t need some dude in New York to prove or disprove that we also have many failed leaders that have failed at that very task as well in the socialist world.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Agreed, and also agreed that Mamdani wouldn’t even be called a socialist in most of the world. But in the American context, everything I said is true. I’m sorry that we’re so distorted from reality that we have to have conversations like these.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Almost like the propaganda about government workers being inefficient and lazy is capitalist propaganda if the socialist politicians are the ones driving efficiently making government work.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      So it was a PR stunt that fixed more potholes than the DOT usually does in a week, and it further established credibility that socialists can perform at least as well as the best capitalists.

      I’ll be interested to see how Mamdani’s longer term infrastructure plans work out.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        So it was a PR stunt that fixed more potholes than the DOT usually does in a week

        No. DOT usually does bursts where they fix a lot of potholes then the mayor articles such as the above. They always hone in on a weird framing of the stat. This is potholes fixed in a single day. Others do potholes fixed total or over a period of time, average pothole fix time etc.

        further established credibility that socialists can perform at least as well as the best capitalist

        Sure but this was never a concern. Its not that we(socialism haters) think they can use a government department to fix an issue. Its that we think they will interject the government into industries it has no business running and then will lead to inefficient run industry. I dont think Mamdami will do that or anything close to it.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I wish those movies were still funny today. They were so great in their time.

        They aged terribly

        • FE80@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m so glad someone finally had the bravery and moral courage to take on the scourge of…Austin Powers movies. Truly this is the cause of our time.

        • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I find the first one aged better than the rest. I still laughed out loud after watching it recently. The later movies, not so much.

          • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Agree, the first one has aged like fine milk (opinions differ of if its spoiled or turned to cheese) and the opening bit of the second film where they had a real budget for a split second.

            The part there thats aged well is of all the actors cast in the parody opening, Danny Devito is the only one who isnt problamatic.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Can you share examples?

          I don’t remotely remember the one i saw.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well, just off the top of my head, from very old memories, there’s tons of sexual assault. Also lots of making fun of fat people and people with different bodies in general. I’m sure there’s a lot more.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Isn’t the whole point that it’s riffing off the sexual misconduct in the bond movies? Also, Its been a while, but I recall Austin always being overtly consensual as a contrast to the Bond series

              • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes, that’s the satire. Which is lost on folks who did not grow up with the old bond movies, instead tossing it in the “boomer humor” category without understanding that the reason it was funny to the last generation was because it played off stuff from the previous generation.

                Time moves on. Like a poster above us said, the movies aged badly because the comedy isn’t timeless, say like Who’s On First.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Someone else mentioned that it’s actually pretty consensual. I assumed it wasn’t, but I guess I must be wrong. Again, it’s been a very long time since I’ve seen them. I know that consent wasn’t the big talking point then that it is now, so I just thought they’d have fucked it up. It’s good to see they didn’t totally.

            • SuperApples@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              There’s also the fact that half the ‘jokes’ were just a scene going on longer than you’d expect.

              I think a lot of the body shaming jokes don’t land not because we are uptight PC wokies, but because when you don’t stigmatise something, it loses its social power. Oh that person has a mole? So what? The boomer humour was ‘oh, it’s bad to have a mole, but you should never say anything about it!’ when you don’t believe either of those statements there is no joke, and the scene goes on for like 5 minutes…

            • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              I wonder what will be considered horrible in 5-10 years from now? What awful thing we are doing now that we are unaware of?

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You thought Trump’s weird enthusiasm for the guy couldn’t get weirder. Just wait.

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Turns out you can improve both public transit and driving! It was sort of being implied by haters that driving was going to get way worse under him IIRC.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can my city borrow Mamdani for a couple months?

    This guy seems like he’s off to a great start.

    And who would have thought paying people to provide services would work? I’m shocked!

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s young enough that, once he’s done in NYC, he could go off and be mayor of several other cities afterward.

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          3 days ago

          The pot hole that Governor Kathy Hochul filled once she was elected to office was finally issuing cannabis licenses to legal weed stores two years after weed was legalized in New York State.

          Thank you very much for providing me the incredibly rare opportunity to use that pun

  • metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Great things happen when the wealthy pay their fair share.

    This is exactly why they never want us to see it happen.

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, I do legitimately wonder how he did this when other administrations didn’t or couldn’t. Would like an insider perspective. Like, did he just pay tons and tons of OT? Did he order the potholes filled quickly, even if they didn’t meet the normal standard for quality? Did he crack the whip and say “fuck your union rules!” Or were past administrations just this corrupt/lazy/incompetent?

    I’m sure his fanboys will say “obviously it’s the last one - he’s not a corrupt capitalist pig”, or something. And I’m open to that explaination. But I’d like, yaknow, some actual statements from people who were actually involved.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      EDIT 2: See Aatube’s comment below for the NYT article link. It’s real.


      I mean, I do legitimately wonder how he did this when other administrations didn’t or couldn’t.

      I suspect the article is overselling it (the comparison, not the raw pothole number), and they don’t source basically anything they’re saying, so it’s hard to definitively call them on that. NYC had a winter that created an abnormal number of potholes, and this article (using an uncited figure) says: “the same number that would usually take New York’s Department of Transport (DOT) a week.” But is that for filling potholes directly after winter? Is it for the rate of potholes per week averaged across the year (which would be a completely invalid comparison)? I guess I could try digging it up, but Novara Media clearly didn’t give enough of a shit when they said it.

      I think it’s cool regardless.

      Donate one hour’s wage per month—or whatever you can afford—today.

      Dunno, Novara; maybe when you decide to learn how hyperlinks work.


      EDIT: I tried to follow one breadcrumb to the NYT using this quote from the article: “According to the New York Times, the incident signaled early on that Mamdani was raring to take on “long ignored street improvements – the kind of meat-and-potatoes issue that some previous mayors have struggled to deliver on”.”.

      I can’t find that quote, even trying several different verbatim excerpts from the quote (but the full quote should be findable anyway). Thaaaaaaaat’s really fucking questionable. I could be missing something. @return2ozma@lemmy.world, your thoughts?

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      The question is, how many potholes do they usually fill in a day? For all we know they fill 8000 potholes every spring, but just don’t advertise it. That being said, letting the people know what you do for them is important.

    • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s possible they’re all fresh new potholes. The reason there’s more of them is the trend from cars to SUVs.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The first part makes sense. But I think an especially harsh winter would be more the culprit than SUVs. Not that they don’t cause more damage - but the number of SUVs in a city doesnt double in a single year and cause a noticeable increase in potholes. We would expect a gradual increase in pothole development that would only be noticeable with statistical analysis over several uyears.

        • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You’re totally right. I didn’t know it was such a big jump. I assumed this was one of those cases where every administration gets to claim something is the “biggest ever” because the thing they’re bragging about tends to grow steadily with population and/or inflation.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I mean, totally possible. But it looks like he just got a lucky break with the weather this year, lol

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I mean, my question was how it managed to do its job better than previous administrations.

        Analysis elsewhere in the thread appears to indicate that none of my hypotheses were actually the most likely scenario. Instead, (and I’m embarassed I didn’t think of this) the most obvious hypothesis is that the DOT is filling potholes at a completely normal rate, and there are just a lot of potholes available to fill. They are comparing filling potholes on the pothole-filling-est day of the year after a harsh winter, versus an average week after average winters in previous administrations.

        So, as always, the null hypothesis when a politician says something should be “it’s spin”

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But I’d like, yaknow, some actual statements from people who were actually involved.

      He said, asking on Lemmy, where none of those people are likely to exist.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure. But a future article or other news source or maybe a former mayor’s aide’s twitter account might have more info, and maybe someone here knows about that