• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think he can actually do that, but even if this works it mostly hurts older voters. He’s eating the chess pieces again.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not having mail-in voting would hurt workers who either can’t take the time off or would have to suffer not having that income for the day. Add on top of that the constant barrages to polling locations, limiting the number of locations, and some people won’t even get to vote after waiting all day.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes it will, but statistically it would hurt older voters the most. 40% of voters 65 and older vote this way.

        I’m not saying this is a good thing, I’m just pointing out that this won’t help him as much as he thinks.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’ll hurt everybody. My state has had mail-in only voting for decades now and we have much higher turnouts than most other states.

            • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Those should be used instead of USPS anyway, and it would ultimately make it so states could just switch to those and not care about the postal service. While it is more convenient to mail it and would absolutely affect turnout in some way, it’s not much more difficult to go a few blocks (or stop while going to the grocery store) and drop off your ballot. It would remove the power of this illegal order since it’s centered around the USPS not delivering ballots to election facility.

            • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 hours ago

              How are they protected? I imagine a truck running in to it or a bit of chemicals would invalidate the votes. Only in blue districts of course.

              • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                This was attempted in Portland during the last major election, and while a handful of votes were invalidated, because they were picked up so frequently there wasn’t many. Also the dumbasses that did it didn’t wait for the election to be almost complete, which allowed for those with affected ballots to revote.

                It also made them improve drop box security this time around, so it’s not as easy to tamper with the votes inside now.

                Remember, the alternative here would be allowing the feds to systematically throw away massive amounts of votes in blue cities via USPS. Ballot dropboxes are way more secure than dealing with the USPS where your ballot is treated like normal mail at best, and something to discard at worst.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If it “works” it’ll be in being applied selectively. They can not apply it in red zip codes and apply it in blue ones, aided by whatever voter database Republicans build. Say some sort of grandfather clause where certain types of existing voters (like those whose grandfathers were all voters) didn’t need to reapply.