You could have tried to explain your way out of the 2021 comment. But nope he just goes head long into it.
I hope we get Mark Kelly as VP now, a fucking astronaut against this clown would be the greatest juxtaposition ever.
I really hope they keep this up. Harris has really mindfucked these idiots.
JD Vance’s 4chan tripcode will be discovered one day, and we’ll find out exactly how far down the rabbit hole goes.
Feels like the type to have joined after moot left.
Speaking of, what’s Poole doing these days?
Worked for google for a few years, then left. There’s nothing about what he’s been up to since 2021, so maybe retired or changed careers and wants to be private.
Keep going, Vance. Pissing off America’s women worked out really well for Dan Quayle.
What a dumbass.
What a sh*t title. He did not double down on the attack. He regretted getting cat-keeping involved in his bigoted view on women with no children
cat ladies rise up
I’ll transition and get a cat to join in.
Already got the cats, myself. I’m halfway there.
I don’t think you need to be a woman to be a cat lady. It’s a state of mind.
Pussy hats are back, dawg
The fuck is a pussy hat lol
TIL they’re supposed to look like cat ears.
Yeah. Pussy hat.
If Harris wins it would be super cool to have the crowd be full of pussy hats
I’m up. Couch fucker gotta go.
Proud cat lady here
Dolphin porn couch fucker.
present
Print photos of different couches and mail them to any or all of these locations:
https://www.vance.senate.gov/office-locations/
Don’t forget to add little love notes. e.g., “Thinking of you 💋”
Oh my, I love this!!!
Even if you raise taxes on people without kids, it will still be cheaper than having kids. Saying that childless people have no stake in the country and maybe their voice should be worth less is wild. But can’t say I am surprised since shit is always flowing out of their mouths.
Taxes are already higher for people without kids. That’s literally the point of the child tax credit.
I wonder whether that demo swings right or left?
Feels hard to stereotype properly.
I think it would lean more left, seeing as they are, childless (so probably favor birthcontrol, pro-choice) and ladies.
On May 19, 1992, during a crucial part of the presidential campaign, Vice President Dan Quayle delivered a speech on family values that came to define him nearly as much as his famous “potato” gaffe. During the speech, he criticized Murphy Brown a fictional 40-something, divorced news anchor on a popular situation comedy for her choice to have a child outside of marriage. Quayle argued: “Bearing babies irresponsibly is simply wrong.
Same Shit Different Decade
And then the show worked it into the script. Wooha mofos.
So I just went and revisited that whole thing. I remember it vaguely, but not any details.
The gist was that Murphy was deciding whether to have the baby or abort it and the Republican vice president says she’s terrible for having it because she’s not married.
Of course, I guess the intent was that she was supposed to marry whoever got her pregnant, but it presents as she should have aborted it. Interesting in today’s forced birth environment.
Of course, I guess the intent was that she was supposed to marry whoever got her pregnant
I think it’s worse with some of these nutjobs. They’d say you shouldn’t be sleeping with someone you aren’t married to, it’s the extra level of “irresponsibility” they want to slander you with as well. Unmarried and promiscuous…
Yeah he wasn’t pandering to 1992 republicans, he was pandering to 1960s republicans.
And he was VP only because Bush the I should have gone to jail for Iran Contra. The more things change amirite
If Republicans had their way, executing unmarried pregnant women for having sex outside of marriage would be some sort of exception to a fetus’ right to life…
an emmy-nominated episode, at that. (for directing, peter bonerz)
Exsqueeze me? Peter who?
Ew.
Taken out of context, the phrase almost sounds like it could be used to argue for education, contraception, and healthcare access, not whatever grossness he’s actually meaning in context.
I agree it should only be done responsibly, which is why I’m in favor of people have the information and tools to ensure it only happens when they’re prepared and able to do so.
This chucklefuck wants to give me more voting power for creampieing (creamping?) my wife? Sure, I’ll vote even harder against this idiot.
Hear that, mothers and fathers of America? JD Vance says that you were worthless until you had children. JD Vance says that your children who aren’t parents are worthless.
Well, why do you think they’re so keen on bringing child marriage back…? Them 12y/o gotta start bringing some value to the table!
Also the sex
deleted by creator
Couch fucker and dolphin lover JD Vance sure is creepy and weird.
of course he’d hang with dolphins. They’re rapey bastards.
Can a couch give informed consent?
Was the couch old enough for the age of consent?
I dunno. But I’m guessing they wouldn’t if they could.
Of course Vance didn’t have sex with a couch!
He raped a couch
I’ll bet Vance would drop acid and jerk a dolphin off too…
“You’re a weird guy, Vance. A weird guy.”
- Dan Marino
I mean, it sounds like an interesting weekend at least
Oh no, I haven’t heard about the dolphin yet. This man is getting ripped to shreds.
It’s crazy that people think JD Vance had sex with a couch. There’s no evidence JD Vance had sex with a couch. It’s liberals that are perpetuating the idea that JD Vance had sex with a couch. JD Vance has specifically denied that he has had bare skin contact with a couch within a 5 year period. It’s ludicrous that JD Vance was banned from a Cleveland area IKEA after having intercourse with a KIVIK Sofa Chaise.
I’ll repeat, there is no evidence to believe JD Vance had sex with a couch. JD Vance is not a couchfucker.
“Something something absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.”
You misunderstand the game here.
I’ll repeat, there is no evidence to believe JD Vance had sex with a couch.
That’s true
JD Vance is not a couchfucker.
No amount of fact checking can ever prove that conclusively. You can’t really prove a negative.
So… JD VANCE, COUCHFUCKER EXTRAORDINAIRE
You can’t really prove a negative
Though you can within a timeframe, right?
That’s why he can say he never fucked a couch in the last five years
Many such cases
Their comment is extremely sarcastic. I think they understand that game.
How the hell do you know? It’s 100% impossible to recognise saracasm in text.
/s
/sWhat’s sar-cas-um?
Oh. Right.
Did JD Vance rape and murder a couch in 1990?
We’re just asking questions here
Yes. Being a rapist is right of passage to becoming a republikkklown
