We have definitely been transported to an alternate universe

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The GOP has used the threat of a government shutdown many times to hold this country hostage. And when it comes to remembering who’s at fault for it, most of the U.S. electorate has the memory of a crack-addled ferret. But if you have a government shutdown THIS close to an election, some of them just might remember who caused it.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    OK, I’m selling everything and moving to a cave in the mountains, because if MTG is going to act sane for 5 minutes in a row, then some serious shit is coming down

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    MTG hasn’t suddenly grown a ethocortical gland. She’s getting polling numbers that scare her, and she wants to win reelection. Georgia is turning purple for a variety of reasons, and a government shut down would be bad for her campaign.

    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      I haven’t seen polling specifically for her district but, while Georgia is very purple (and has been since like 2014), her district is gerrymandered to hell and back to not be anything other than red. I think I saw that it’s one of the deepest red districts in the country.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Deep red refers to voter registrations. It’s generally a very good indicator which was they will go, but this election is anything but politics as usual.

        I’m not privy to her internal polling, but I’ll bet she saw numbers than people in her district are concerned about Trump, see a lack of leadership in the GOP, and are considering staying home rather than show up for her. Angry people show up to vote, and if enough people say they are going to vote Trump out, then she doesn’t want to be on his boat when it happens.

        Another possibility is that she’s testing the waters for a Senate or Governor run in 2026. She doesn’t need to move towards the center if she can bash people to her right. It makes her look reasonable and conciliatory without actually being either one.

        Either way, she’s not doing this because of principles. She’s doing it for personal benefit, because she’s a conservative.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m sorry but, as a Georgian, I’m pretty sure she has a 0% chance of either losing her district or getting elected to statewide office, no matter what she does.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only danger MTG has in her district, as someone who lives right next to her district, is being primaried. She will never lose the general to a Democrat.

  • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really wild to see MTG appear to be on the correct side twice in a week. I wonder what the goal of the party is aside from distancing themselves from a losing candidate.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Putin consistently underestimates women. He was happy Hillary was secretary of state until she gave vocal support to the Ukrainian Revolutions in 2014 that ousted his puppet. He assumed CIA was pulling her strings or operating through her so tried to burn that bridge. Trump was a resounding failure at implementing long term policies to benefit Russia, so now he’s banking on Harris being passive in foreign policy.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I wonder if there’s any way that could be changed by executive action? If the government gets shut down, Congresspersons don’t get paid. Their aides and support staff are essential because they do the real work, but they don’t get paid until they pass a budget…?

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is she trying to distance herself from the maga side of the party after seeing the polls predicting a big defeat this election?

      Very strange to see.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Priority #1 is always to remain elected so that you can stay “on the take”.

    • zcd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      She might’ve been hit by a stray neutrino or something? Flipped a random bit?

    • JesusSon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      169
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I think she woke up and realized a government shutdown right before an election caused by ineffectual republican leadership might hurt them in the down-ballot. Or we woke up Sunday on the next timeline because the earth exploded, and everyone died Saturday night. It’s been a crazy week and it’s only Tuesday.

      Edit: looks like a shutdown before the election due to ineffectual republican leadership is back on the menu boys.

      • StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think this is absolutely the correct interpretation of this. Shutting down the government because repubs don’t want to play ball weeks before an election is only likely to hurt their chances.

        • BigFig@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah but they do this every election year, and their supporters never care

        • Rakonat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think you’re putting far to much faith in people willing to vote ®, their base would vote for them even as their families are sent to labor and death camps, while undecided and ‘independent’ voters will cast their ballot entirely on the last headline or 72 hours.

          To me this reeks of Greene and other Magots realizing their wing of the party is imploding and will have to find a place in what ever GOP comes out the otherside of this election and the next midterm. Trump’s decline makes it pretty obvious they need someone else’s coattails to grab onto and rally around, so she’s trying to be the loudest voice in the room to be part of the new power structure if not the face of it.

          • StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It matters very little if I or any of us have faith in the republican voter base and rather it matters if the Republican leadership thinks it could matter to a significant enough portion of their base that they should avoid a shutdown.

            Also, I find the rest of your comment to be quite insightful. I do think most of the Republican leadership are still all in on Trump, however I wouldn’t be surprised if there some back up plans in the works.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is exactly it. Shutdowns are not popular, if they shutdown the gov before the election it is going to cost them significant votes. They are already worried about the impact of Trump on down ballot candidates, a shutdown will almost certainly cost them seats. This is MTG expressing her panic because she realizes how stupid the GOP is behaving with an election about to happen.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Of course she does.

            She’s terrified that if the Dems take the House back, she’ll lose her committee seats again. Like all small-government advocates, she wants power.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah, thank you. Considering what a shithole “safe”-ly red district she represents, I didn’t think she had any particular reason to care even with vote losses from a shutdown.

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        It makes logical sense for a person to draw this conclusion, but MTG is famously an idiot, so that’s what’s baffling. What convinced her to change her tune?

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Earth exploding and everyone waking up in a new timeline, having absorbed our prime selves, is somehow more likely now than it was 5 years ago.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        79
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean yeah that’s sound political strategy, but you’re telling me MTG woke up and possessed the self reflection necessary to realize that?

        I think it’s more believable that we all died.

      • Trilobite@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        No way she is involved in the Russian election interference case and is trying to pull a tim pool

  • tuckerm@supermeter.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    This headline is easy to read wrong – my brain grouped the subject of this headline the other way at first. I read, “Marjorie rages at (Mike and calls to fund government)” rather than “Marjorie (rages at Mike) and (calls to fund government).”

    • tuckerm@supermeter.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      2 days ago

      That was a great explanation.

      I remember hearing an interview with John Boehner on NPR (former Republican Speaker of the House) a few years ago. He was talking about the government shutdown that happened shortly after far right wing was elected in 2010. Apparently, a few of them barged into his office after the shutdown and demanded to know why the government had actually shut down.

      And Boehner was like, “Um…you said you wanted it to?”

      And the right wingers said, “Well we didn’t think it would work!”

      These are irresponsible people who think they should just get to play games in life.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

        –Jean-Paul Sartre

      • sawdustprophet@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        And the right wingers said, “Well we didn’t think it would work!”

        I recall a number of voters who voted in favor of Brexit who were interviewed and said things like “but I didn’t think it would actually happen!”

        I also seem to recall a similar sentiment in a case where people voted to strip funding from a local library in Michigan, then were shocked when the library had to close.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Now is the time Dems must insist on border security bill and negating presidential immunity as a must for passing the budget

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never give them what they want in exchange for them doing the bare minimum. The Dems just need to send flyers to government workers whose representatives got them furloughed.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Either there’s writing on a wall or she got hit by a brontosaurus bone and thinks she’s a functioning Congressional member…