• kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I2P is IMO the future for torrenting. The only downside it still has is that their is less content. But that will be solved when more and more people migrate to I2P

          • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I2p is fairly easy to use. The normal I2P client even comes with a torrent client bundled. Also URLs for postman aka best torrent site are included.

        • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Does that mean you would route your BitTorrent traffic through I2P?

          Doesn’t that severely limit peer discovery to only other I2P users, since AFAIK I2P has no exit nodes / clearweb access?

          • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes that is true. Their are a few bittorrent clients that can cross seed however. But it mainly stays inside i2P which Is good and makes it fully anonymous

    • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Can someone correct me here.

      If I have i2P enabled on my qBittorent client and I start seeding a torrent downloaded from a non-i2P connection.

      Does my seed of it allow others to download that torrent through i2P?

      • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No, you need to cross seed. A torrent client that allows for this is biglybt. Or you need to manually re upload it on i2p

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t see that where I live - some ISPs offer port forwarding, some don’t. Some just give you IPv6 with ports unlocked manually in router config

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bulgaria, Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Netherlands, Russia, Cyprus, Moldova, Romania, Ukraine, Singapore, and Sweden. They all spit in the eye of DMCA.

    VPS in any of these countries, or just find a provider that doesn’t care about torrenting. If you go the VPS option, run your own VPN and just look for a VPS that allows considerable traffic. A quick example, Ultahost (Netherlands) offers a VPS with unlimited bandwidth for $7/mo if you pay for 3 years in advance. Like sure, now you’re paying to torrent, but I would rather pay $7/mo to protect myself with a VPN that I control vs worrying about port forwarding and getting DMCA’s in the mail. 🤷‍♂️ I guess it depends on how much skin you want in the game.

    • ntn888@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s exactly what I did. Better yet I routed it though a wireguard tunnel! I documented the process here.

  • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never had a problem with it in Spain. What is different where you live? CGNAT?

    • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      In principle yes it does - in case of TCP based protocols, without forwarded ports incoming connections aren’t possible. In the context of the main Torrent protocol this means you can only connect to peers that have ports forwarded. This is largely solved by uTP protocol that uses UDP hole punching method to circumvent this.

      So the sort answer is no this doesn’t matter unless you’re using very feature poor torrent client.

    • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Does port forwarding really matter if you have a Holborn 9100?

      Does port forwarding really matter if you have Hannah Montana Linux?

      Does port forwarding really matter if you have a Dawson’s Creek trapper keeper?

    • Kane@femboys.biz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There are providers that do not provide you your own IPv4 address, with a feature called “CGNAT”. Often, they will then block you from port-forwarding altogether.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Bc $$$.

      My provider won’t allow it unless I pay them $15/mo extra.

      You can change the setting on your router anytime but it won’t work if your ISP doesn’t actually allow it.

  • tVxUHF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    We just need to add I2P directly into the client in a way that’s transparent to the user and all the problems are solved.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If I could have an all in one browser like Tor or have jackett do postman too I’d be set, except for the whole “works better the longer you leave it running” thing is only true until my battery dies.

  • Aux@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Rent a seed box. That’s the best solution for everyone.

  • SmokeFree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Contact your ISP, and request for CGNAT removal. Unless you live in Germany.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    You have to separate pirating and torrenting. I’m pirating stuff non stop each day. I’m torrenting maybe once a month, if that. It’s just not the go to thing for a lot of users, so issues around VPNs and torrenting probably aren’t that pressing to warrant any kind of reaction.

      • Mr. WorldWide@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        yes, seeding works too, with no port forwarding. With mullvad, it just works and with proton I have to enable “moderate NAT” sometimes, but seeding works without port forwarding, it always has

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Only because you’re seeding to people that have port forwarding active. You can’t seed to people that are running the same setup as yourself.

          • Mr. WorldWide@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Port forwarding is a huge vulnerability. With proton it’s not as much of a vulnerability, but it still opens a lot of shit that should stay closed

            whatever the case is, I’m able to seed without port forwarding

            • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You’re opening a port in your VPN connection so no there’s no “huge vulnerability” (even without a VPN you’re only opening a port to your torrent client) and as mentioned, you’re only seeding to people who have port forwarding set up. If more people run without it like yourself, the whole system breaks down.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      When you are not port forwarding you can only download from users who are actually port forwarding, or am I incorrect?