not digg
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Gerald of Hillwood@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours ago

Iran retaliates, fires missiles at US bases in Qatar and Iraq

www.al-monitor.com

external-link
message-square
51
fedilink
237
external-link

Iran retaliates, fires missiles at US bases in Qatar and Iraq

www.al-monitor.com

Gerald of Hillwood@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours ago
message-square
51
fedilink
Iran retaliates, fires missiles at US bases in Qatar, Iraq
www.al-monitor.com
external-link
Iran retaliated on Monday for the US strikes targeting three of its nuclear sites, firing at least 10 missiles at American bases in Qatar and Iraq.

https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2025/06/iran-retaliates-fires-missiles-us-bases-qatar-iraq

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How could the Iranian’s do such a thing! Won’t someone please think of poor Israel who shot first, or the idiotic American president who just wants to drop a nuke to satisfy his ego.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Butbutbut… Trump said NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!!! How can this be???

    • Tronn4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sned in the Kardashian with the Pepsi can

  • itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Reports indicate it was a muted response to indicate an intention to deescalate. They had to do something but they didn’t go crazy. We’ll see, I guess.

    • PaulBunyan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I heard they fired six missiles - the same amount the US used - intentionally. Targeted non-civilian locations. Weren’t complete dicks about it.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Same thing when trump assassinated soleimani. They rattle a saber a little bit and call it even. Trump announced a ceasefire agreement 3 hours ago so it looks like business as usual.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Evidently it’s an imaginary ceasefire agreement and nobody even asked Iran, so… We’ll see. The token retaliation suggests they aren’t trying to escalate with the US specifically.

  • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I was told we didn’t start a war.

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oh right uh…hang on…it’s just like…hostilities?

  • It'sbetterwithbutter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Good for them.

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sucks for us though.

      • It'sbetterwithbutter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Sucks for all decent people, but Israel wanted this and America is their bully so…

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s funny that you think America isn’t pulling the strings from the start.

          • It'sbetterwithbutter@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            There’s little difference between the two at this point. They are intertwined. Fuck both administrations.

            • greenfire@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Trunk & Netanyahu teaming up for Operation Jailbreak against Iran

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Totally expected. What would be unexpected is firing at the country itself.

  • Substance_P@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Another link for live updates:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2025/06/23/iran-launches-attack-on-us-base-in-qatar-live-updates/

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I did say it wasn’t going to be chill over there for very long.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Welp…

  • Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So far, reports state “fired at” but come up short of saying “hit”.

    Sounds like air defenses may have intercepted all of them? At least to the extent we can trust reporting at this stage.

    ngl, it’d be more satisfying to read about a successful counterstrike…

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why not attack the U.S. directly? There are plenty of coastal bases in the U.S.

    I feel like it would hurt a whole lot more if they were to go after something on U.S. soil…not that I exactly want that. Being bombed at home sounds terrifying.

    Im just curious what the logic was behind this.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You are getting downvoted but i agree with you its obvious they dont really try to hurt the US.

      Even the missiles they did fire, ALL of them were intercepted by US missile defence and not a single person was hurt.

      Its just to show that they hit back a little symbolically.

    • ghurab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Even if they wanted to, how would they accomplish that?

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They do technically have orbital launch capability, which implies they in theory have the capacity to construct an ICBM, even if not with a nuclear warhead necessarily. Granted, the results of such a strike almost certainly would not be worth the costs to them so I’ve no expectation they’ll do such a thing, but they probably could if they wanted to badly enough.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Same way the U.S. flew war planes all the way to Iran.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Iran has no ability to do that.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Iran’s friends Russia and China certainly do.

            • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m not sure those two really do. Any Russian claims have been proven suspect, and China’s force protection has always been their Achilles heel.

              • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Really?

                https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/06/12/navy-deployed-3-destroyers-planes-monitor-russian-submarine-and-frigate-off-florida-coast.html

                https://nypost.com/2024/06/12/us-news/four-russian-warships-including-a-nuclear-sub-now-sitting-200-miles-off-the-coast-of-florida/

                https://news.usni.org/2023/03/23/northcom-russia-close-to-persistent-nuclear-cruise-missile-attack-sub-presence-off-u-s-coasts

                https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2023-04-26/u-s-russian-subs-in-atlantic-more-active-than-weve-seen-them-in-years

        • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I can cont on 0 hands how many airbases Iran has access to near the US.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Perhaps because if they did that, there’s a very high chance trump would nuke them. He’s been itching for a reason to use nukes since his first term, and that would give him the excuse he wants.

      e: I think the fact I got 2 opposing comments (he’d do it without justification and he’d be stopped by the CoC even with justification) might be telling here. He’s a monkey with a machine gun, and who knows if justification would work on others in the chain of command? Perhaps they’d rather not risk that.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        If Trump wants to nuke them, he nukes them. He doesn’t need a reason, he is a demented megalomaniac with a cult following. There will be some more finger-waggling in congress and pearl clutching for the midterms after the fact and that’s it. So why appease him or try not to upset him?

        Iran probably just thought hitting these targets was easier.

        I fucking hate the world we live in.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Maybe, there are a lot of people who would probably not be too keen on doing that through the chain of command. Nukes aren’t something you just pull out a brief case and push a button with.

    • cattywampas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This seems performative. Only a handful of missiles and apparently Iranian state TV is reporting successful strikes, but I can’t find anything reputable that confirms that. Sounds like all missiles were intercepted. Iran gets to show their people that they’ve responded without risking a true escalation.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That would make sense. I guess from my point of view, I’d be pretty pissed if I was Iran right now. At least 9 of their nuclear scientists were assassinated last week, and now their nuclear sites have been all bombed. That’s as good of a declaration of war as youre going to get. But I can understand why they wouldn’t want to wage an all put war if they dont think they’re prepared for one.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s no way they come out on top in an all-out war with the US. Terrorists working unofficially are their best best. Not like there’s any lack of people who (justifiably) hate the US.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yeah from the footage I saw in this thread it seems like they were all intercepted by Patriot missiles and if any did hit they did minimal damage. Russia just launched hundreds of drones and missiles into Kyiv. Iran certainly could have done more, so I absolutely agree it’s performative

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There will be a “terrorist” attack in the near future. The something with guns during a crowded event. My money is on a 4th of July event shooting. Sadly that’s the only way Iran and other poor nations have to fight back. Until Iran and poor nations get nukes they will be taken advantage of. I’m pro Iran nukes simple because them not having them is obviously not working for anyone

      • octobob@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        My first thought was a false flag attack

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because these are short to medium range ground fired missiles? They don’t reach that far. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think they have submarines that can get close and fire missiles at the United States proper.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I have no idea. They have a nuclear program, so I assumed they have a somewhat sophisticated and modern military.

        • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They have OIL.

        • AZX3RIC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s a bad assumption, North Korea has nukes.

          It’s just a bigger stick.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The ONLY good point to this would be that it would draw the US public into action. A base in the Middle East got hit? People shrug it off, it’s nothing new and doesn’t affect them. A naval or army base on the East Coast gets a missile hit? At least if there was disagreement on what to do, we’d be arguing about it. Assuming that Iran can even get that far…

      And to be clear, it’s only a good point in that it would wake people up that shit isn’t right, and maybe they’d feel threatened enough for their own welfare to do something.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There hasn’t been a war on U.S. mainland in 150 years. If a misil hits it it could trigger easily WWIII. Last attack on U.S. was 9/11 and that started multiple wars.

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Didn’t Japan hit Oregon in ww2

      • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Removed by mod

        • homura1650@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          What is the metric of success. Iran wants the US to stay out of the region. Nothing about our response to 9/11 suggests that that is how we would respond to an attack on our soil.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Fear. And a lot more difficult to successfully hit.

    • evenglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Have you tried using logic to answer your question?

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Apparently not. since its so obvious to you, why dont you use your big brain and share with the class?

        • evenglow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Why haven’t you tried to use logic?

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.89K users / day
  • 8.03K users / week
  • 14.2K users / month
  • 30.9K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 30.4K subscribers
  • 28K Posts
  • 103K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Wren@lemmy.world
  • Admiral Patrick@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org