• Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    and the politicians pinky promise they won’t use it for market manipulation… pinky promise

  • regedit@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I always wondered what happened to all the neat reports of cars that ran on old oil or could get 50mpg in the 50s. Guess they were too disruptive. We can’t have nice things. 😮‍💨

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Cars that run on old oil are basically just diesel engines. It’s also pretty easy to get a vehicle with high fuel efficiency, it’s really hard to get one that also meets emission standards and doesn’t kill you in a crash.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    You can set up a genetic engineering lab for under 5000 bucks in your garage, and I would prefer you not being able to google how to DIY some super-ebola, thank you very much.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Look, we need to open source genetic engineering.

      Some bastard will create super-ebola, sure, but some proactive individuals will quickly create a free vaccine for it, and for cancer and the common cold. (It will also turn you into a literal furry, of course, but that’s probably a price worth paying.)

  • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    secrecy orders have been imposed not only on inventions affecting military defense but also on those alleged to threaten economic stability, with critics noting that many such restrictions rest on speculative or unproven harms.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I suspect the “threatens economic stability” is stuff like printers that can produce dollars and the type of paper/thread/plastic material that makes up modern currency. I think people are looking for a conspiracy here when it’s just a logical choice. Some things people shouldn’t have a playbook on how to create.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’ll suppress it unless they can make money off it like crypto or “AI”.

      • survirtual@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Bitcoin was publicly released with full code and no pre-mining. It could not be patented for this reason.

        The original creator is still unknown and has never moved their coins.

        This strategy is the way.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yo.
          Thanks for curing me of my ignorance, i had no idea. I’m going to have to read more about this! I always thought crypto was cool in theory, unfortunate the state of its practice.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      In which case some rich cunt will patent it and nuke the internet of its details

  • mrductape@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anyone want to bet that there are inventions that are great but would cost some people serious money and that’s why we’re not seeing them?

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It looks like they fuck over inventors.

      Most of these appear to be for government projects such as with the Department of Defense and the NSA.

      Sometimes, a regular invention outside of government contacts gets labeled with this and the government don’t pay for it. The inventor isn’t allowed to talk about it so they get fucked out of any income.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not taking that bet. From the linked wikipedia page.

      According to reporting in Wired and Slate, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has at times considered applying secrecy orders to inventions deemed disruptive to established industries.

      You may be sure that there are times when they did more than consider it.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They do have networks of radiation sensors and reporters because of the guy who built an atomic device out of smoke detectors, giving himself and others radiation poisoning. Also, there have been some nuclear weapons go a tiny bit permanently missing, and suitcase-size dirty bombs were a huge scare for a hot minute, etc etc.

      Honestly it’s really shocking we escaped the past century alive.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly it is a bit busy, like feature creep.

        The lower stock and left bow are unfortunately now broken, but I want to do my best to restore it eventually.

        I’ve already collected feathers and a new rifle scope, I just need an antique Volkswagen spring leaf…

        Yeah you think this is a witch stew, but it isn’t. These are the parts I need to properly fix my dad’s invention.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like an air cooled fiberglass engine that runs on water, man!?

    • GhostPain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Water? Brother that’s 50’s tech.

      We’re on to Cold Fusion reactors the size of your fist, SRO high-entropy alloys, and room temp superconductors.

      :D

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Really though.

        I’ve been saying it for a while, even if we figured out fusion, it wouldn’t see the light of day.

        The petrodollar would tank in value because fusion is obviously superior to gasoline/petrol.

        It would be the end of the US currency if petroleum were to be replaced.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          I’ve been saying it for a while, even if we figured out fusion, it wouldn’t see the light of day.

          Fusion reactors would be absolutely massive, hugely expensive, centralized facilities that provide something of great value for very little labour input. They’re the PERFECT tool of capitalism.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          See I can’t see this being true, because if we figured out how to do it, and let someone else do it first, they would get all of the gains first.

          • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            That’s a valid counterpoint that I’m definitely too intoxicated to properly address but idk I think you cooked me on that one.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Truman’s house and Presidential Library aren’t too far away if I need to egg it.

    • dickalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes this video destroyed me and made me realize that any life-changing awesome invention would surely be suppressed

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Literally does make sense. You don’t want the how to for building a good gyroscope out there(too much). Some bits and pieces are really hard to get working well. And when you do you get great ICBMs. Still might want to patent it.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, let’s voluntarily lower the quality of all of our lives simply to give some minute advantage in the geopolitical chess game.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        You would not use those in consumer tech. They are only useful for spaceflight. Which necessarily includes weapons.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          All technologies have military and civilian use. Just because you can’t think of a civilian application for precision gyroscope doesn’t mean others can’t. Precision surveying immediately comes to mind as a potential application, plus civilian inertial navigation devices.

          And no, there is not some magical level of precision that only the military has use for. If something has military applications, it also has civilian ones. Hell, there are potential peaceful applications of nuclear bombs. If those can be a dual-use technology, anything can be.

          • belathus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I work with precision gyroscopes in a commercial setting. Subsea precision surveying and inertial navigation systems are spot on examples of what we use them for. It helps to know where seamounts are, or where you put that subsea cable or pipeline.

    • Unlearned9545@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, exactly. I used to design tools to test these and we weren’t allowed to patent them, but I think some of the high level concepts were secret patents though I can’t know that.

      For anyone wondering the thing ICBMs (and jet planes) use is called a gyroscope and gives the same output but it isn’t a “spinning top” gyro that you might be thinking of. Rather think super sensitive dynamo, or reversed motor. Tiny rotation turns into voltage signal.

      There is an even newer type that uses laser but I don’t know anything about it.