“A few days later, DFCS presented Patterson with a “safety plan” for her to sign. It would require her to delegate a “safety person” to be a “knowing participant and guardian” and watch over the children whenever she leaves home. The plan would also require Patterson to download an app onto her son’s phone allowing for his location to be monitored. (The day when it will be illegal not to track one’s kids is rapidly approaching.)”

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Software neutrality MUST become a constitutional right. I will never install your proprietary subcontracted stalkerware garbage and you never never have a right to extort me onto some stalkerware platform of any kind. My device is like my home. I have a right as a citizen in a democracy to lock my doors and bar anyone I choose from entry.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Uh… If this were a legitimate abuse scenario (it isn’t), they could come check up on your home too.

      There are also things called search warrants.

      • j4k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m well aware. Child Services is a criminal organisation that should be loathed by everyone. Every agent there is incentivised through commission to exploit the parties involved. They are worse than the police in atrocities and terrorism.

        Forcing someone to use an OS, platform, or app is placing something like Google or Amazon into a position as your judge/cop entering your home. It is more like forcing you to house them and their thousands of stalker business partners to collect data to manipulate and exploit you. It may sound very tin foil hat at first. I understand that people do not keep up with digital progress and change. Think about how often the internet is your primary source of information. There are only 2 web crawlers Google’s and Microsoft’s. There are no others that are relevant or useful any more. All search engines query one of these two databases either directly or through their API. This is the major massive information bottleneck of concern. If you follow so far, here is the kicker, your search results are not deterministic. Two people searching for the exact same thing on two different devices at the same time, will get different results. The information you see is biased and cherry picked. This is why the data has been collected. That data is a fundamental part of your person. It is bought and sold to manipulate you in the present age. This is a coup against democracy. Back in the first 3 years of primary school you should have learned the 3 pillars of democracy: Legislative, Judicial, and the free Press for a well informed public. There are 6 entities in control of all news media and all are owned by billionaires with anti democratic agendas. The internet is the last refuge of real democracy of any kind. This is the fundamental reason it matters and why free software matters. This is actually the front line of the fight to have any form of free information and democratic right of autonomy. The moment this last refuge is snuffed out, the entire house of cards will fall and the neo dark ages will truly begin. This mirrors the history of feudalism 1:1. Anyone asking you to trust them on this level is looking to enslave you. That is the endgame of this issue. The goal is not to make you a slave in name. The goal is to alter the meaning of the word citizen to cause the term to be functionally interchangeable.

  • Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is my third time coming across this topic today. I was waiting for additional information, but I wonder if there is any history there. Maybe the sheriff has been feuding with the family for a while and wanted to use this as an opportunity to exert dominance. Maybe they suspect the kid has truly been causing trouble and so are using this as an opportunity to track the kid and see.

    Overall, seems like an overreaction, especially in small town USA.

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It absolutely boggles my mind. When I was in 5th grade we rode bikes everywhere without anyone caring outside being home in time to eat and do homework. Less than a mile is visible without effort, possibly even if there are hills in the way.

      • bean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        My grandmother literally used a whistle. I had to stay within hearing distance. Which was pretty loud tbh. We played outside all day though 😋 I didn’t get my first cell phone until 2003 I think. I hate to say it was better back in my day… because it really wasn’t by many metrics. But by that metric, I think it mattered.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    10 year old is too young to walk alone to town but 16 year old can be trusted with a car.

  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I already didn’t wish to bring kids into this world this would’ve pushed me there. Holy 🤬.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    “She kept mentioning how he could have been run over, or kidnapped or ‘anything’ could have happened,” recalls Patterson.

    Might have even had Police Contact and that’s dangerous as FUCK.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, why isn’t anyone clutching their pearls when I walk my dog twice a day? I’m in the street, on the sidewalk , I even cross medians. And I have a large dog, so I could theoretically be attacked by a large dog. “Anything” could happen.

  • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is insane. When exactly is a permissible age for kids to be walking about on their own?

    Things are absolutely different today than they were when I was a kid. My parents never had any idea where I was. They simply said “be home by dinner” and I was home by dinner. Did we get into trouble? Absolutely. But that’s part of being kids.

    Fast forward to today. My partner and I don’t see eye to eye on this because of how things feel so unsafe now. I know how valuable that independence was for me though, so I tend towards permissiveness.

    The thing is, kids still walk to school in all kinds of localities. I remember walking to school on a much busier road than the one described in this article. The worst I ever encountered was teenagers throwing eggs once. (Haha. They missed.) And yeah, drivers may hit you. I get it. The government can help mitigate that with better planning and sidewalks, if they actually cared.

    But a tracking app too!? Where the government can know my kids location?! That presumes my children even have a phone with a mobile plan, which is a privilege the government isn’t paying for. And if they did, @#$& you government! Seriously. WTF?!

    I’m both flabbergasted and not. Because, these days, I pretty much only expect fuckery. I wish that weren’t the case. I often hope it isn’t. And I love being surprised when it’s not the case. But 🤬!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was around this kid’s age when I was at a friend’s house for a sleep over and we decided to leave his house at 2 am and go downtown and see what was happening. We had big backpacks full of stuff because we were 10 and it was an adventure. Cops drove by and looked at us as they drove by and didn’t slow down. And the town was a whole hell of a lot bigger than the 370 population of this one. There were also a lot of people likely to be stumbling out of the downtown bars at 2 am, but I don’t remember anything other than the cops driving by and looking at us. Apparently Indiana cops back then didn’t think it was all that big a deal.

      But things have changed for kids since the 1980s and, in cases like this, not for the better.

      • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If anything, the cops should have been more on the ball in your case. I would have been grateful as a parent. Bring the kid home and let it end there. What happened in this article is describing something so very far on the other side of the pendulum. Good grief.

        As for me, I managed to stay out of sight of the police. And I will admit that there are times when the police would have had very very good reason to take me downtown. 😬 I can’t even count how many times the cops brought my older brother home. But in every case, it ended there.

        I’m guessing the cops want to make sure kids are better controlled these days that way they can more effectively shoot other innocent kids with all that extra free time they have.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was the 80s. They were probably just glad we were just walking through downtown with backpacks on and not taking a hit off a homeless man’s crack pipe without heeding Nancy Reagan’s warning about saying no.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I babysat younger kids at 13 while the parents went out and got back after midnight. Nowadays I think leaving a 13 year old alone would get someone in trouble much less have them be the one watching the other kids.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is insane. When exactly is a permissible age for kids to be walking about on their own?

      In Georgia, probably 30.

    • SeekPie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where I’m from, most kids start walking/biking/taking a bus to school from the 1st grade.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t mind having USPS offer cellular service and Internet, as a service. Bring back basic banking at the post office too. Solid revenue streams for the USPS and cuts out the cancer of ISPs and cell companies.

    • shottymcb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I live on the same street as an elementary school, I see dozens of 3rd-5th graders walking to school every morning. Really confused about why this person was singled out.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You don’t want the Dutch scenario to happen. Children as young as 6 are joining bike gangs that hog half the trail width and don’t bother to step down in pedestrian zones!

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I would have thought a red state like Georgia would not have what they call “Nanny state” laws? I’d like to see the actual wording of the “reckless conduct” law they would be charging her under. Does it actually specify how, when and where your children can go unsupervised and what ages of children it applies to, or do the cops just get to “use their own judgement”?

    edit to add: I feel sorry for kids growing up today and apparently in the last 20 years or so. When I was a kid our mothers just said “Be back by supper” and we went out and played wherever. they didn’t know where we were. No cell phones to track us.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      or do the cops just get to “use their own judgement”?

      ding ding ding ding ding

      We have a winner.

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Often enough even we didn’t know where we were going. Or where we were. Some creek, forest, who knows. We’d go home once hungry.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Meanwhile, in ‘Commie-fornia’, I regularly see kids that age riding on the (public, not school) bus alone. And when I lived in New York I’d see them on the subway. Not the slightest bit unusual in the early afternoon when school lets out.

      But conservatives are terrified of their neighbors, for some reason. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        When I lived in San Diego I literally took the city bus to school. And so did a lot of other students (not just at my school). There were times the drivers didn’t know the stops so I’d have to tell them they passed it.

      • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        But conservatives are terrified of their neighbors, for some reason. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

        Can’t blame them. Most conservatives in the USA are unstable, gun wielding nuts.

      • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        You see, that’s because New York is a safe neighborhood. But that small ass town in Georgia? Full of unimaginable terrors. Most of them wear uniform.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Republicans love that shit. They hate regulation that stops large faceless coporations from deatroying the environment or working their employees to death but they can’t get enough of controlling everyone who isn’t like them.

      In this case I really can’t tell what it is they want to control, though, besides maybe a small community harrassing someone they don’t like for reasons we don’t know?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you think Republicans aren’t the party of surveillance and authoritarianism then you must have never looked at any policy ever written by one.