Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth denied allegations that he texted classified war plans to a Signal group chat that mistakenly included The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg.

The National Security Council confirmed the chat’s authenticity but called the inclusion of Goldberg an inadvertent mistake.

Lawmakers from both parties demanded investigations, with former CIA Director Leon Panetta warning of potential espionage violations.

Hegseth dismissed Goldberg as a “deceitful” journalist. Trump denied knowledge of the incident.

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    You’re right Pete. It wasn’t texting.

    It was RCS through an untraceable encrypted messaging app named Signal

    Which is WORSE since records are destroyed

    • airglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      About the technical part, Signal uses the Signal Protocol instead of RCS. (Google also uses the Signal Protocol to encrypt some RCS messages in Google Messages, but the Signal Protocol and RCS are not the same thing.)

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Well shit you know what I mean …messaging with data. But thanks for the specifics I knew it wasn’t RCS but that’s all I could think of

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Fuck you Pete ‘DUI Hire’ Hegseth.

    You used a non-approved communication application and caused a massive data leak with you and your incompetent morons in office using OpSec that my junior engineers know better and if any one else did what you did, that’s be fired and be facing charges.

    Fucking pathetic children who can’t take any accountability.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      Definitely showing her whole anti war schtick was always bullshit. JD Vance was the only one pushing back in that thread, and not for the right reasons.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Nuh uh” is what you’re going with, huh? The screenshots, the validation from your own administration… and your response is “didnt happen”?

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    These fucking guys only ever lie and deny.

    Are we really too stupid and weak as a country to be able to do anything about this?

    • pubquiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It would seem the case - the US is impotent while the sitting president twiddles his thumbs and denies knowing his upper eschelon staff are using unsecure comms. Makes me laugh about the tough-guy image they want versus the limp-dick energy the display.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    inadvertent mistake.

    Lets give the benefit of the doubt and say it was a mistake. Is that a matter and a position, where such a mistake is tolerable? Or is it something that disqualifies for any position in that domain and demands immediate resignation?

    Because if you seriously make a mistake, and you realize the gravity of it, you take responsibility for it. If you instead remain in position, you either don’t recognize the gravity of it, which is an even bigger reason to resign, or you indeed acted with intent.

    But in this case it did not start with inviting Goldberg. It started with making a chat group on an unauthorized app, likely using unauthorized devices to discuss matters that are explicitly forbidden to be taken out of specific permitted official channels.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Wasn’t me”

    — Pete Hegseth

    Ah yes, the classic Shaggy defense. What’s that shit conservatives say? We’re still in the first year.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    He knows they have the screenshots and the NSC confirmed it, right?

    https://x.com/JenGriffinFNC/status/1904221405618577650

    NSC statement:  “At this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain. The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to our servicemembers or our  national security.” - NSC Spokesman Brian Hughes

    The Trump administration does not deny this Signal group chat about the war planning for the Yemen strikes is real. Trump’s top national security advisers added reporter

    @JeffreyGoldberg

    @TheAtlantic

    to the war planning text chain on non-government social media app, perhaps breaking secrecy laws. Read this shocking story below.

    • chetradley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      These dipshits can’t get their thumbs out of each other’s butts long enough to get their story straight. I’d laugh if I thought there would be any real consequences for this nonsense.

      Only 46 months to go…

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why is nobody talking about the fact that we are bombing Yemen? Yes, including a random person in a text channel talking classified information is a problem. But, why are we just brushing off the actual chat contents?

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Because pointing out that America is bombing Yemen is like pointing out that water is wet.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s not an excuse. There were huge ass protests over the Vietnam War, and the Iraq War. Putting pressure on officials to end this bullshit os worthwhile. Shrugging, and saying meh, it is what it is is super unhelpful.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You can protest the bombing of yemen and you will be doing a noble thing and get zero attention and have zero impact.

          If you clown on them for inviting a journalist into their secret consequence free war chat - you will recieve lots of attention and potentially play a part in forcing some of these gouls to resign.

    • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t think we’re ignoring that, so much as there is an overwhelming amount of bad shit to talk about stemming from this single incident.

      And to be honest the bigger issue revealed here isn’t the failure to protect classified information or that they’re bombing Yemen (In a vacuum at least) right now but the fact that they are violating the law also by using an app that destroys documentation of their conversations. This has implications not only legally or militaristically but also that they know they want to do shit that would be illegal and evil enough that they don’t even want to use standard classified channels, not just bombing of Yemen but probably more future evil shit.

    • Englishgrinn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There’s a couple reasons -

      1. It wasn’t so much “bombing Yemen” as it was, bombing a terrorist organization within Yemen’s borders. This is something every American administration has done for decades. That makes it poor political fodder, you can’t “one up” the competition with it.
      2. Most Americans would agree that the Houthis, once it is explained to them who they are, need to be bombed. The actual action would be reprehensible to some, but acceptable to most. You can’t put pressure on an admin to change their tactics when they feel they have a plurality of support.
      3. The sad and undeniable fact is that in American politics - American lives are simply more important than foreign ones. That’s not really unique to American culture, it’s not meant as a criticism, it’s just a sad reality. Bombing Yemen is pretty low risk for American lives - but sloppy OPSEC put American lives at huge risk so that’s where the focus is.

      In a perfect world, the fact that America is committing violence in other nations and is not realistically reigned in by International Laws or Treaties would be a point worth getting upset about. But that fact is over 100 years old and has been successfully normalized. The idea of incompetent buffoons operating the Department of Defense like a bunch of frat boys trying to organize a kegger is marginally newer and more impactful on the national psyche.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      CENTCOM shit. If Trump and Elon were genuine, they’d get rid of this true waste of tax payer $s.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They’re bombing the Houthis rebels who are (were?) fucking with the red sea shipping route to protest Israel, but I’m not sure how much they’re still fucking with it today. The Yemen government isn’t fully in control of Yemen.