• CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 hours ago

    He’s telling everyone what his plan is. War incoming by Jan 2029.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ya’ll think the US will ever collectively understand that they can’t keep pretending like these things are jokes or “wouldn’t actually happen”? I swear, Trump could grow a little mustache and people would be saying “oh no, I can’t believe we’re about to fall into fascism!”.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This guy is just such a dickhead. The type of people that still support this asshole are very much telling on themselves.

    Probably watched Archie Bunker and rooted for him.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      I think these people are watching The Handmaid’s Tale and not understanding that Gilead is supposed to be bad

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 hours ago

    He’s not joking. What does he have to do to be taken seriously? A hostile takeover of the capital?

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We’ve had elections during a war before and we can do it again. Ukrainian laws don’t apply to the US.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, the law pertaining to not holding elections during martial law in Ukraine was created during another person’s presidency as well. He didn’t make that. (It stemmed from Russias invasion into Ukraine in 2014, law made in 2015). Zelensky didn’t become president until 2019.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If the war was closer or even inside the US, it might be a different thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if he could still consider it though.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 hours ago

    lol cool so he just said the quiet part of the playbook out loud.

    For those in the back: he’s gonna get the US in to a Serious Fucking War right before the next election so that he can pretend he’s got justification to call off elections.

    Pay no mind to the fact that FDR won his third term at the peak of WW2.

    Come to think of it: that’s probably why he wants to do it: he knows he probably can’t win another election (putting aside the illegality of running and serving for a third term), and doesn’t want to think about himself being overshadowed by “some old librul Democrat from the 1940s”. And yes, that is a completely serious guesstimate on orangeboi’s rationale for this.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Legally, it won’t matter. He doesn’t hold office until the next guy, his term ends in 2029. If there is no replacement, the office is simply vacant, and we already have processes for that.

      Legally, it won’t matter. If (when) he’s ignoring the laws to that level, it doesn’t matter what anyone pretends happened with an election. The laws will have no bearing anyway.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Most importantly, the states run the elections.

        So he can “cancel” the election, but only red states would listen. Blue states would still hold elections and report results. And with red states not holding elections, it’s safe to say any election would lean heavily left.

        So republicans would only lose seats, and trump would get zero electoral college votes. Well, most likely every red state would still try to send electors for trump

        After midterms we’ll be able to see what’s gonna happen if that plays out.

        But honestly, blue states should be prioritizing building up their own NG the next three years just in case.

        • blackstampede@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Or alternately-

          1. He cancels/delays the election due to a national emergency. He could potentially delay until the following Jan 20, arguing all the while that he’s “cancelled” the election. Shifting, contradictory public statements muddy the waters.
          2. Some blue states move ahead with elections anyway, arguing that the delay is unconstitutional.
          3. The supreme court rules that delay is constitutional with a dissenting democrat minority.
          4. Red states claim blue state elections are invalid and an attempted coup (because after January 6th, they love applying that word to things).
          5. Blue states select a president, Trump denies the results (we have a precedent for this now) and refuses to cede power to the president elect.
          6. As the January 20th deadline rolls around, Trump jails the new president as a traitor, following up on the claims from his base that the election was a coup.
          7. January deadline passes, Trump arguing simultaneously that the election was a Democrat takeover AND that the Democrats cheated because red states didn’t hold elections.
          8. With no (free) political opponents, Trump releases an executive order stating that the office of the presidency must be filled at all times, and remains in office.
          9. Multiple court cases are filed and allowed to creep through the courts before being dismissed for various reasons.
          10. People begin to adapt, normalize the situation, and eventually become distracted by a new scandal.
      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s cute that you think laws matter to the fascists.

        That’s the entire point of what I’m trying to point out here. You’re stuck on what “legality” means. I’m saying they’re changing the definition.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’ll be before the midterms, in case anyone wasn’t clear about that.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Industrial strength “Joking” being used in this headline.

    Trump has no sense of humor nor has he ever told a joke.