• airportline@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Google really seems to want to disincentivize people paying for YouTube Premium rather than just downloading an ad blocker.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    I finally gave up when they started blanking out my home page as I turned off history… I don’t even miss it

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Meanwhile on Steam my “family” consists of 3 adults with different addresses, last names, and credit cards, who have had accounts for decades and never lived at the same place.

    We have full access to each other’s library.

    • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      How do you add new people? I tried and a prompt told me that we don’t seem to share a household.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Sure, the 2 constants in the universe are Entropy and Enshitification. When Steam turns to shit I’ll go back to Piracy just like I did when Netflix went to shit.

        My point is that companies don’t have to be shit about account sharing and family plans, and people don’t have to accept it.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Firefox + ublock origin still works to block all YouTube ads

    Invidious is a frontend for YouTube that blocks all their trackers and ads

    PeerTube is an alternative community ran platform to replace YouTube in the future

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      ff+ubo+privacy badger (ff on my distro suggested privacy badger, can’t remember exact number but when ubo blocks over ~1k privacy badger has like 2 - 4 on it, surprising me a little there are not more trackers) on pc, my phone has no adblocking atm and I know their info on me is wrong because all I do see are gambling ads and I have never gone to a gambling site, I don’t even get the scam game ads my gf does on her phone. One day I may try out one of the “delete my dam info” places just to see how much they really have on me

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Invidious sadly doesn’t allow for an account and subscriptions, at least not without running your own server which appears… complex.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        That part is working now

        I can load in my subscriptions.csv file from youtube into my subscriptions list on my Invidious account.

        And that all works through a web browser

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    As someone with divorced parents this invalidates what I call a “family”. Same to you… Netflix

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fuck em. We try to pay even tho we know how to get it for free. Go back to ad blockers.

    Not a perfect experience but it’s better than putting up with that corporate bullshit.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Peertube needs monetization and the ability for people peer without self-hosting. A torrent client of sorts.

      The product, in it’s current form cannot replace Youtube. Youtube gives you traffic, a free place to host even your crappiest footage, and money if enough people start watching it regularly.

      Peertube isn’t free, it’s just someone else footing the bill, which breaks under load.

      • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Seeing the number of dead torrents, it’s highly likely that many videos will quickly die as well

        But it would be nice to have a way to seed.

        Problem with all federated platforms: which one should people pick? Most instances don’t federate with others

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          highly likely that many videos will quickly die as well

          Ideally, everyone would just post their own stuff from their own disk. As things got popular, the fans would cache it for others. We’d just need the self-hosting angels to help us with discoverability.

          Realistically, a quick death is probably a fortunate way to save resources if a video can’t gain traction from being useful or entertaining.

  • girthero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just got a notification that Amazon Prime is doing the same with grandafathered accounts allowed across households.

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This will be like Netflix pushing against shared accounts, sure it will work and their revenue will go up, but I will stop being a paying customer and will only watch videos from my notebook with adblocks.

  • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Why pay for premium anyway? Let alone a family plan. You still get ads. They can be skipped too — SponsorBlock will do it for free. Google could use this but chooses not to.

    They want YouTube to be like cable TV. You pay for it. You watch ads. You pay more for premium channels.

    • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      YouTube is my only subscription.

      I use it for Music and Video. I definitely get my money’s worth, they’re streaming to me at least 8 hours a day.

      If it’s not background music, it’s videos. I can’t even fathom how many hours of ads I have avoided.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve never seen a single youtube ad with uBlock Origin. SponsorBlock takes care of most of the sponsored segments that a premium youtube account won’t get rid of.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        same here, but even I’m looking to cancel both to avoid supporting a US company and because they’re making my experience worse by having a shitty user experience

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I pay for it, also no ads except the sponsor plugs, which are pretty easy to skip. Overall a better experience than the non premium. I don’t live in the USA so my cost is like $5/month.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You don’t get ads. You pay less than double what two premiums cost and your household can share.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Background playing on mobile

        The fact that they put this behind a paywall is enough for me to never pay them a dime.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m in a family plan, so when this change hits, going to have to find alternative methods.

      • notgold@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I do too but the value is waning. When I try to watch without having logged in and see all the ads, that add some value back

          • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Go to a family member’s house and try to show them something on YT.

            Cringe in horror at the experience.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Not the person you asked, but I do that sometimes. For instance, when I want to watch a specific video but I don’t want having watched it to affect other video recommendations.

            • garretble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I don’t know if this actually does what I hope it does, but if I happen to watch a video that I don’t want recommendations on in the future, I manually delete the video from my watch history.

              I don’t know if that really helps, but at least as a placebo it feels good to do.

              • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                If unsure of a video, 1. on desktop open in new tab - if ya don’t want that content/creator click the 3 dots on the main page video and select don’t suggest channel, on phone (just did this a few mins ago) back out of video and since on mobile the home feed doesn’t reset hit the 3 dots etc

      • AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I dont pay for it, use grayjay or firefox with ad block, I have no ads, background playing on mobile and I could care less about YouTube music.

    • krunklom@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      YouTube is fucking garbage.

      I don’t care about the ads because it’s fucking garbage, and why would I watch garbage?

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have to hand it to them, they are really good at finding new, innovative ways to make the platform worse.

    • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Deactivated Premium recently. I used their music app when driving – expecting some ads now - nope, it just doesn’t allow running in the background anymore.

      Seems like such a hostile thing - I’d like to think running ads would be a positive net income for them. (Now that I think of it - maybe they don’t have it built out into their music service.)

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      63
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you pay, the platform remains great. I get a discounted YouTube premium membership through my mobile phone company. I think YouTube is great, I never see ads, lots of features.

      Just to offer an alternative view.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Wow, shilling for YouTube premium and anti-net-neutrality (the “discount through your phone company” part) in one comment.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Is recommending a product that you’re satisfied with “shilling”?

          Is there a product in this world that you think is worth the price? Does that make you a shill?

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Not allowing ISPs to pick and choose winners among web services is absolutely what Net Neutrality is about. Bundling or discounting subscriptions isn’t technically the same thing as zero-rating, but the end result of making a particular ISP-preferred service cheaper than alternatives is the same.

            • FishFace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              9 hours ago

              You’re just trying to piggyback on a vaguely-related concept that your audience already likely hates. Call things what they are, not what would be convenient to you if they were.

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “If you just give them your wallet right away, the mugging isn’t so bad, really. They didn’t even kick my teeth in!” 🤓

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          40
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s a product. You can buy it or not. If you don’t think it’s worth it, stay away, or stay on the free tier. You’re acting as if you’ve got some kind of right to use a service that’s provided by a commercial entity.

          • archonet@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            46
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            and it’s a multi-billion dollar corporation, that already makes more money than you or I will ever see in our lifetimes, that actively strives to make the user experience worse for people who don’t pay, when they’ve got a practical monopoly in the “free video sharing platform” market. And you’re whiteknighting for them. 🤡

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              By Darwin you see a lot. I was merely stating that I think YouTube premium is worth the price I pay for it.

              Is there no product you are satisfied with? Your life must be pretty bleak.

            • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              13 hours ago

              more money than you or I will ever see in our lifetimes

              I mean, I feel like you need to expand your comparison a little as the amount that you’ll see in your lifetime is such a minute grain of sand on a beech compared to corporate profits. The money they made today, hell, in the last hour… minute… will dwarf the amount that you will likely see.

            • reev@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              12 hours ago

              actively strives to make the user experience worse for people who don’t pay

              And evidently those who do! My parents live in a different country. What are they, not my family? What’s the family plan for? (Rhetorical question)

              With Vanced I have so many more options to customize my experience. I can hide shorts I never watch, set a fixed resolution for data and wifi, return the stupid dislike ratio they removed… And if I’m using Vanced anyway to fix all the issues they introduce, why on earth would I additionally pay for their service?

              I want to pay for their shit, especially to support content creators, but I can’t support a platform whose singular mission it is to make everything worse for everyone constantly. Feels like every month I have to get a new extension to undo some horrible design decision.

            • FishFace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              whiteknighting

              was a weak-ass criticism when it was on 4chan being leveled at anyone who said anything not derogatory about a woman, and it’s weak-ass now. Oh no, someone on the internet has an at-least-partially positive opinion of a company, how awful, we’d better stereotype and body-shame them for it.

              If you had your way, the only comments about YouTube - or any other product from a large company - that would be allowed would be negative ones. How the fuck does that make sense?

          • lobut@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I’ll join you in the downvotes. There’s many reasons to hate YouTube. Asking them to pay for video content to everyone for free is a bit silly.

            I’m also not saying you shouldn’t use alternatives or run an ad-blocker. Those are cool. I just find it funny how someone is saying: “I get some benefit in paying for this service” results in such backlash, lol.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I know. I thought we were upvoting respectful debate, not having a popularity contest. But apparently not…

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              YouTube steals other people’s work?

              I tend to watch content creators who willingly put their content on YouTube. Am I missing something here…?

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Do you have a means of removing sponsors on the mobile app though? Revanced has sponsorblock and adblock in the app.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You mean removing sponsor led segments inside a video? Sort of. The jump ahead feature, which I think is a premium feature, allows you to jump in the video based on where everywhere else is jumping in the video. So when a sponsored segment starts and you skip forward 30s (double tap on mobile, ‘k’ on PC) you are offered to jump ahead. You click that and you get to the end of the sponsored segment.