• RedSeries@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s a ton of trolls in here who can’t celebrate anything good while anything bad is happening. Yes, his response to the genocide in Israel was abysmal. I have no illusions that the right would have done any better, and in fact believe Trump would have thrown more fuel on it. I’m ecstatic that Biden is not running again so that maybe Kamala can finally fucking do something about it. But I think we can take five seconds to admit that he did a lot of good for our country in other ways and made the right call here in dropping out.

    For those who won’t budge:

    There’s literally no winning, huh? Any flaw or misstep is enough to complain about and use as a reason to abstain or be an accelerationist. Y’all will claim Biden and Dems are monsters for their flaws. All that does is hurt the sane side of our government and make the actual fascists who have done so much worse have a better chance at taking over.

    Can y’all please please please not let perfect be the enemy of good for once in your miserable life? This thinking is what brought us Trump in the first place, and while I can agree we need to do better, start at the local level, because only caring when we’re on another brinkmanship presidential race makes you look like short-sighted toddlers.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a ton of trolls in here who can’t celebrate anything good while anything bad is happening.

      The spectacle of the presidential election has diverted a lot of attention away from the genocide in Palestine, the upswell in COVID infections and deaths nationally, and the decaying domestic infrastructure driven by climate change. Biden’s retirement isn’t changing any of that.

      There’s literally no winning, huh?

      Kamala’s been the heir designate to the party for less than a week and she’s already writing condemnation letters aimed at Palestinian Rights protesters in DC. Its a grim state of affairs, particularly with the police violence on student campuses still fresh in people’s minds.

      Can y’all please please please not let perfect be the enemy of good

      We’re waiting for some good. So far, we’ve had a bumper crop of cutesy memes and a bit of relief from the deeply depressing poll numbers that signaled Trump would receive a free ride into the White House in November. But we’re still waiting for a candidate to put more on the table than her famous “$20k in relief for a Pell Grant Recipient who runs a business in a disadvantaged community for at least three years”.

      Not everyone is happy to open their wallets and bust out the walking shoes for just any generic liberal candidate.

      • RedSeries@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I cannot wrap my mind around this level of privilege. In all honesty I really can’t. I don’t think there’s a thing I could do to change your opinion and this nugget:

        Not everyone is happy to open their wallets and bust out the walking shoes for just any generic liberal candidate.

        Suggests you or others with your opinions won’t vote because… she’s generic? Or didn’t do enough yet? And claiming that Biden dropping out won’t end the genocide, so let’s not see it as positive?

        What saint would you prefer we vote in? Can you explain how they are both morally spotlessly pure AND have a snowball’s chance in hell? If you’re convincing enough, maybe that second coming of Jesus will lead us to a utopia. /s

        Some of us are not in the position of being able to use a foreign tragedy as our stopping block. Some of us have our rights and safety on the line.

      • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        If stopping genocide is your biggest issue, I suggest going to rail against in it right-wing spaces instead. There’s a lot more pro-genocide to stop there.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          rail against in it right-wing spaces instead

          If you’re defending a genocidal administration, you’re a right-winger.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump essentially said he would just let Israel “finish the job”. So yeah, throwing fuel on it is exactly what he would have done. Turned Israel loose.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Finding a reason to permanently write somebody off as bad is the way of the sith conservatives.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      it’s pretty telling that, for all the biden bashing and accusations of “you support genocide!!!” in this thread, i see very few concrete actionable suggestions from those people about what everyone should be doing right now. beyond “sToP sAyInG gOoD tHiNgS aBoUt BiDeN”

      LOL

      no.

    • blarth@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Look, all these posts from accounts on lemmygrad, chapotraphouse members, lemmy.ml…they’re all bullshit. I’m convinced that they are entirely Russian trolls. There is no making them happy with slightly left of center. It seems they’ll never be happy until America has been destroyed. There is no point to placating them or even acknowledging their existence.

      The “genocide Joe” moniker was particularly stupid. Do you really think Joe Biden was going to single handedly denounce Israel and kill off a key strategic alliance because of a few extremists? It is a completely silly notion.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        In my childhood (in Russia) I’d talk this way about Russia. So they might be real.

        I just (EDIT: later) realized later that many of the good things around me are too, well, not from Mars.

        And that many of the bad things around me are absolutely not specific to Russia or ex-USSR.

        And that one thing absolutely right is scolding all you don’t like and not bowing your head, because when you accept fools and their foolery because of some false “lesser evil”, you lose.

        Not all of them are trolls. Shit, I’ve met tankies more libertarian that a lot of people “not interested in politics”, because the norm for that grey mass has shifted to a really dark place.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        When you say slightly left of center, to whom are you referring? Bernie wasn’t allowed to run for President.

        Slapping a rainbow sticker on capitalism doesn’t make the Democrats leftists. We have two conservative parties in this country, just one that’s evolving into their final form (fascism). Don’t get me wrong, I’ll be voting for Harris in November and I’m ecstatic that Biden stepped aside. But if all the leftists online are “Russian bots”, than all you centrists are pro-capitalism LLMs. And we’ll be right back in the same position in four years.

      • Kagu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Leaving aside the actual political substance of your comment. Don’t you think it’s a bit… Head in the sand to assume anyone who disagrees with you is some “Russian troll”? I know we all exist in social media bubbles, myself included, but my social circles and my online circles all share “radical” concerns about the administration and country in general but it generally comes from a genuine desire for our politicians and therefore country to be and do better. We’re all Americans just like (I presume) you.

        I joined lemmy.ml cause of the FOSS stuff but I’m learning it comes with a reputation I didn’t know about.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        they’ll never be happy until America has been destroyed

        it’s important to slap down the nonsense and call out the bullshit at every opportunity. they’re coming out of the woodwork to harass and manipulate everyone into second guessing themselves, for the sole purpose of getting trump into the white house.

        fuck that shit.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The problem is this isn’t true. I hate Biden but I despise the way Trump makes him look decent comparatively. How long can keep running slightly worse candidates compared to your previous one (hopefully Harris bucks this trend)?

          People who call out Biden get called single issue voters; by people who’s only concern is Trump doesn’t get elected. They are ignoring absymal healthcare, terrible foreign policy, horrible housing prices, costly food bills, even the stable finicial sector is now losing jobs due to the AI craze.

          I understand why people are worried about Trump. Still, we need candidates who actually want to run the country correctly and not just cater to the rich. We cannot sacrifice everything because the news makes Trump to be all powerful.

          harass and manipulate everyone into second guessing themselves, for the sole purpose of getting trump into the white house.

          You are gas lighting. We need to start caling this everytime we see it. Otherwise, you would bother people on Truth Social and Twitter (or even reddit which actually has a population that could matter in a national election) if you wanted people to stop voting for Trump. But that would make too much sense.

          • blarth@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Gaslighting? What?

            You’re never going to get the perfect candidate until we reform elections (ranked choice, more parties, get rid of citizens united).

            • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Gaslighting is a colloquialism, defined as manipulating someone into questioning their own perception of reality. - Wikipedia

              You cannot blame us for not liking Biden when he does not cater to us. We are not the problem, even if you manage to phrase the issue to make it seem we are at fault.

              You’re never going to get the perfect candidate until we reform elections (ranked choice, more parties, get rid of citizens united).

              Absolutely keep voting the most liberal Congress people you can. But let’s not kid ourselves: you have to vote for the people who want reform election to get reform election - and Biden isn’t one of those people.

              Edit: extended last sentence to make it make more sense

                • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Trump is a distraction. He’s a tool to compromise values and pretend we have a common goal. Yelling at Biden accomplished more already than fearing Trump.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “You know, in recent weeks it’s become clear to me that I need to unite my party in this critical endeavor. I believe my record as president, my leadership in the world, my vision for America’s future all merited a second term,” Biden said. “But nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving our democracy. That includes personal ambition. So, I’ve decided the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation. It’s the best way to unite our nation.”

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not to mention he’s basically been given the green light by SCOTUS to eliminate the opposition. He’s been given supreme executive power and is choosing not to exercise it.

    • broton33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      No. We are considering multiple challenges at the same time.

      His decision here does help unite the democrats and brings hope to the younger generations. But, this decision also does not absolve him of his war crimes. Both can be true.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh God. You’re right. I better vote for someone who’s going to make the genocide stop by nuking them. After all, if we just completely eradicate them, then there’s no more genocide.

      Right? That’s the answer you’re looking for?

      Right?

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      He is stepping aside and letting his VP, who has very notably not supported Israel, take the lead. Can you shut your piehole for a second? You got what you wanted, “Genocide Joe” is no more.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        5 months ago

        She’s light years better than Biden.

        But she still takes AIPAC money, and spoke at their conference 7 years ago after they helped get her senate seat

        https://www.vox.com/2024-elections/362782/kamala-harris-gaza-israel-palestine-biden-netanyahu

        But we literally just saw public criticism work, why are you so quick to say we have to stop?

        We can’t just show up once every four years and vote. We need constant pressure on politicians for them to do the right thing

        Because there’s constant pressure on them to do the wrong thing, and that almost always comes with “donations”.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Stop.

          She hasn’t been afforded the chance in the current context to actually express her true stance. I expect it to be much more tepid towards Israel than Biden’s, but at the same time, we are trying to prevent a fascist takeover here, and it is a very fucking bad idea to piss off AIPAC in that context, as infuriating as that is to admit. She’s got to walk a tightrope to win back Arab-Americans that Biden foolishly pushed away, but at the same time can’t afford to have AIPAC putting all hands on deck to try to kill her campaign.

          TL;DR: foreign influence organizations both covert and overt - including, but not limited to, AIPAC - need to be cracked down on aggressively, but I really don’t see that happening until after the election at the very least. And even then, the odds are low, because they’ll all just bribe tons of politicians and offer quid pro quos lobby against any such laws. Its a huge problem and it’s proven to be infuriatingly intractable for AGES.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          if your goal is a world where no one ever says anything good about biden, ever, then you’re in for a disappointing life.

          also, if you think the united states will ever stop sending money and weapons to israel due to many many economic, geopolitical and military strategic factors–same thing, get ready for sadpepe.gif for the rest of your days.

            • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              LOL saying “biden did a good thing” is not supporting genocide, no matter how hard some people wish it were. as others have said, you CAN oppose some of a person’s actions and praise others.

              i will add though, for THIS election, trying to convince people that they’re “supporting genocide” by voting at all is not only an egregiously, laughably flawed argument, but it’s making things worse, not better

    • drdiddlybadger@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      No one fucking forgot we just dont want the guy who says he’s going to accelerate the genocide to get in and with someone fresh it will be easier to pressure them to end our material support for the attrocities.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      And your not? Yout stopped paying your taxes right because it is genocide. I mean your not just supporting it out of a little inconvenience that might happen in your life right?

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          bidens realtion to the actions to israel is equivalent to the voter/taxpayers relation to biden. both are bound in relationships that limit the actions they can take. Im fine with hey he could limit more of what we do in relation to what he has to do via congress but the whole supporting genocide thing then its like well then so are you and all the west by and large. you can’t make one indirect thing as being the thing and not ignore the other indirects along the line and say oh well thats to indirect.

          • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            If he did, he’d be doing something about it like protesting or getting involved with local government (which involve going outside, the horrors) instead of trying to act superior to a bunch of strangers on the Internet. Doing the latter takes absolutely no effort, so that’s the lane he chooses.

      • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe vote for the felon because the genocide did not happen on his watch, so he is free of all blame.

        /S

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    150
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fuck off Joe, you’re slightly better than Hillary because you did eventually listen to reason.

    But he should have said years ago he wasn’t going to run in 2024.

    Hell, even if he just said it 6 months ago we could have had a real primary

    It’s good he finally did the right thing, but he came damn close to not. He’s not a hero because he stopped doing the wrong thing at the last possible second. A week ago he wouldn’t stop rambling about “Lord God” was the only one that could make him drop

    Dude is off the deep already, and has been for a while.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      nah. i won’t call him a “hero” but this is the best way it could have happened, rather than republicans having YEARS to foment hatred and spin conspiracy theories and make everyone waste time debunking lie after lie about harris.

      and nobody’s going to switch from D to R because it’s harris instead of biden. you can be fairly certain, however, that there WILL be people voting who weren’t going to vote at all when it was biden instead of harris

      should he be applauded? yes. is he a hero? no. should he have announced it years ago? no fucking way.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        5 months ago

        but this is the best way it could have happened

        The best way was this happening a year ago so we could have a primary…

        But you don’t think Dem voters should have had a say?

        I’m a lot more democratic than you apparently…

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Looks like we’re back in full “you can’t criticize the Democrats at all or you’re a Russian troll” territory. I hate this sycophancy.

          I’m with you on this one. The Democrats have been skirting democracy to the best of their ability for years. I’m glad we’ve got a better chance of defeating Trump now, but I’m unwilling to concede the democratic process of nominating candidates. If we celebrate this fucked up process instead of holding their feet to the fire, they’re just going to learn that actually they don’t need to bother involving the people at all. We cannot give a single inch to the plutocrats at the top.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          LOL good job parroting fox news’s desperate “bIdEn ChEaTeD tHe DeMs!!!” talking points. i’ll bet you’re doing it for free too.

          news flash-- biden isn’t running, and you could have voted for anyone you wanted in the primary. so this entire “debate” about biden’s shoulda/woulda/coulda, while entertaining to obliterate people in, is getting the tankie position exactly nowhere

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            47
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            What?

            So if Faux News says we didn’t get a real primary…

            We have to lie and say we did?

            That’s Trumper logic man

            Have fun with that.

            Edit:

            and you could have voted for anyone you wanted in the primary.

            In my state (and others) Biden was the only Dem on the primary ballot…

            • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              42
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              LOL why weren’t you and the apparently millions of other like minded yous mobilizing to either get someone else on the ballot, or writing in someone else?

              or were you just accepting what you were told to, like you’re accusing everyone else of doing now?

              again–what do you think you’re going to accomplish with all of these sad desperate dEmScHeAtEd attacks? making people not vote now?

              have fun with that

              btw: voter registrations for 18-34 year olds surged AFTER harris became the nominee. that means people are registering specifically to vote for harris. does that grind your gears? LOL

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                33
                ·
                5 months ago

                again–what do you think you’re going to accomplish

                Did you not see what happened to the Republican party when they stopped holding their politicians accountable?

                Why are you trying to make the democratic party just as shitty?

                btw: voter registrations for 18-34 year olds surged AFTER harris became the nominee. that means people are registering specifically to vote for harris. does that grind your gears? LOL

                No…

                It’s a good thing, I’ve spent over a year saying Biden and Hillary are the only two who could.lose to trump…

                I’m glad Biden finally listened to people who knew what he was talking about about. But I’m still mad that he waited so long we didn’t get a primary.

                You seem to be operating under football logic where people pick a team and only say good things about them.

                Which again, is what made the Republican party into what it is today.

                So I ask again, why do you want both major parties to act like Republicans?

                If youre not gonna answer, there’s no point in me wasting time with you.

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  29
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Your argument here might hold some weight if it weren’t for the fact that the only reason this conversation is even happening is that the presumptive Democratic candidate just voluntary withdrew from the race when it became clear that he couldn’t win. The last guy staged a fucking coup after he lost.

                  How many months did you just spend bitching and moaning about how anyone would be better than Joe? Now you have anyone else and you’re still salty about it. I wonder how you could make it any more transparent that your goal is just to discourage people from voting.

                • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  LOL ok. you can sit there and say dems are “acting like republicans” for the rest of your life, but you’ll die having NEVER been correct. dems have not tried to run fake electors. dems have not attempted an insurrection on the capitol to overthrow an election. dems don’t nominate a rapist conman. this is among MANY, MANY things that blatantly throw your notion of “both sides are the same” out the window. honestly it’s been tiresome for years

                  the immediate objective, right now, which should be everyone’s absolute top priority, is keeping trump out of the white house. that’s it. your motivation for trying (poorly) to undermine that doesn’t matter. what matters is that your arguments are weak and without substance

                  yet still, assuming some parallel universe where you’re right, you still haven’t spelled out exactly what actions you expect people to take. i’m assuming it’s not to vote at all. so, again: have fun with that

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a really awful take. It’s good that Biden has stepped aside but our lack of a primary absolutely isn’t “a good thing”. Primaries are how we battle test our candidates and Harris has never performed well in one. I hope to hell she wins but I’d have more confidence if she’d been able to secure the nomination through traditional means.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, she didn’t do well in her presidential primary, no argument there. But she did do well enough in her primaries for AG and Senator for California to win not only those nominations but those elections, too.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          who do you think would have won (or should have won) this hypothetical primary that was “stolen” from us?

            • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              funny how no one started whining about it until just now.

              what might have happened, i wonder, if all the hissy fits were thrown back then, instead of AFTER biden stepped down (thanks to hissy fits)?

              don’t answer. that was a rhetorical question. congratulations, you have been successful in your mission to poopooh biden and make me not vote for him.

              LOL

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t know where you’ve been but I’ve been bitching about this for the past six months. I absolutely loathe the fact that we don’t have a real primary when we have an incumbent president and I was really disappointed when Biden changed his tune from being a one term president. I also really appreciate what Biden did do in office even though I thought he’d be an awful president during the last election!

                Thanks for making so many assumptions about me though, I’ll be sure to mulch my garden with all these strawmen you set up.

                Oh and you better fucking vote, don’t even think about sitting out the election - it’s cowardly and immature!

                • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  i stand corrected. however, “dems stole your primary” is already a favorite of republicans, not to affect meaningful change, but to make people vote for anything except D. so sorry to say, you’re in for more of that

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Now that he’s stepped down, it’s a lot harder for you to hide that Trump love. You’ve lost your talking point, lol. Floundering just like the GOP.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      He didn’t think he’d be pressured out 6 months ago. He’s obeying popular opinion that shifted after the debate.

      Someone here compared it to convincing an elderly parent to stop driving. They’re not heroes either, it just sucks for everyone that nature works this way.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        He did like a tenth of the press conferences as the last two presidents…

        And people were pointing out his age related issues 4 years ago.

        The only reason it took till the first debate for a critical mass to demand he drop out, was that was the first people had seen him speak for longer than 5 minutes. Ive been calling for him to do more public appearances/interviews this whole term, lots of us did. But we were called conspiracy nuts for saying an 80 year old was as capable as the average 80 year old.

        The people around him day to day knew how bad it was and knew he’d be forced to step down if the public knew. So they fucking hid him. Just like Republicans did with Reagan.

        Like it or not, that’s what happened.

        I hope you at least learned that it’s not just ok to criticize your “team” it’s fundamentally necessary.

        If people hadn’t, wed still be running Joe and trump would still be likely to win.

  • Sarothazrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    At first, I was pissed that he didn’t bow out two months ago.

    Now I have nothing but respect for the man. He realized when to step aside and let his partner take the reign, and did so with effective enough timing to throw a massive wrench into the republicans’ plans.

    If Kamala wins, history will see him as the kind elder statesman who knew when to step aside for the good of the country.

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Couldn’t agree more and his words on the matter were really touching.

      I just hope the party as a whole can keep this up. I have never felt like the party cared more about being in touch with the people than it does now.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Trump wins, history will remember Biden as “the antichrist, bringer of despair, slow witted grim reaper, sad.”*

      *This antiwoke curriculum is approved by the council of Gilead.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      5 months ago

      Biden got forced out by his donors and other Democrats (establishment ones surprisingly). He would have kept running if he could.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        So what? At the end of the day he did what people wanted, it just took a demonstration of how badly we wanted it.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Why respect a Genocidal maniac for stepping down only when forced to do so?

          Just be happy he’s not running anymore nobody’s buying these fairy tales about how great he is.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Are you denying that you have zero geopolitical experience whatsoever? Because unless you do, you have no fucking clue what Biden’s options even are, being that you’re a one note armchair political scientist without the ability to even acknowledge the most basic of realities surrounding the situation.

                You obsessively post about this issue several times every day to the point that it would be weird even if you yourself were both a Palestinian and also have hard evidence that Biden himself pulled the trigger every single time someone died.

                Your obsession here is beyond strange, and it makes it impossible for anyone observing to think something weird isn’t going on with you

                • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It’s so fascinating that you simultaneously think that people can’t possibly know anything about politics if they don’t have geopolitical experience, and yet you can be absolutely certain that there is no way biden could be guilty of killing Palestinians unless he is personally executing them. Your self contradictions are so blatant, but you seem to still be completely blind to them. When you grow up, you will look back on this version of yourself as so childish.

          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why respect a Genocidal maniac for stepping down only when forced to do so?

            Because the alternative is they don’t step down.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Except no, that’s not the alternative. The party gets to choose the candidate. Biden tried to stay and they told him to get out the easy or the hard way.

              You must have forgotten Biden not holding a primary.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  They openly ditch him during the convention.

                  Donors already pulled out. Establishment called for him to step down voluntarily. if he doesn’t listen he doesn’t magically get to stay.

              • kandoh@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                If you think Biden could’ve been forced out if he wasn’t willing to step down then you don’t know anything about politics.

                I bet you were one of those people demanding the sergeant at arms arrest people who ignored subpoenas during Trump’s first impeachment.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        honest question, are you guys making any headway outside of hexbear and lemmygrad? i mean i’m sure everyone loves you in your safe space, but you have to know your “vote josevlad marxtalin 2024!!!” stance is pretty laughable out in the world

          • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            So, serious question: Do you only step up to defend other countries, or are the people in the U.S., where I assume you live, also on the agenda for the evening? Cause yeah, Genocide is pretty shit. Evil even.

            What about the black communities?

            Homeless?

            Native American?

            Disabled?

            Veterans?

            Children?

            And the larger issue of fucking fascism that leads to precisely what you’re so stuck yelling about blindly?

            Here’s what I think: Most of you are parrots. Actual sentient wagons transformed into people. Many of you don’t have many details, you kneejerk on issues that cannot be approached from any other angle than “Yeah, of course I agree” and challenge everyone who doesn’t immediately bow with “YOU SUPPORT GENOCIDE?!” as if you’re the seagulls from Finding Nemo. Now maybe I’m wrong. Maybe YOU stand more often. If so, why stand with the crowd who will move on when the next big thing happens?

            Never, EVER, remove support for the greater good when the greater evil guarantees more suffering. Otherwise all you’re doing is becoming a part of the problem.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              5 months ago

              Of course i do. Which is why I will never support someone complicit in Genocide. Unlike the people enabling Fascism.

              • itsgoodtobeawake@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Your track record seems to have zero criticism of Republicans, when we know Trump would be far worse in supporting Israeli warcrimes. Just this once, can you come out and say that Trump would actually be worse for the one topic you ever seem to discuss?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              You can look at their history and see that since October they’ve basically commented or posted about anything else. It’s several times a day they are canvassing for “Palestine” ie. Trump.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Hmm but Extra Militant Joffrey can lay the actions of Israel all at the feet of the POTUS as though he were directly responsible, even though a second grader would easily understand that makes no sense.

            Stop pretending that decades of financial support are new. They aren’t. We all know that, and your canvassing just makes you look like a liar.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      John Adams is the first American president to make unpopular decision and did not let ego rule him, despite losing him the election. Americans were baying for blood to go to war against the French in 1799 but Adams refused, knowing that America will lose if he declared war. It cost him his re-election, but he did the right thing.

      Edit: wrong year

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        John Adams is the first American president to make unpopular decision

        Nobody tell this guy about the Whiskey Rebellion.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    History will paint Biden very kindly. This speech will be the example of a humble, good man.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      169
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is like calling a school bus driver a hero because at the last possible second he hit the brakes instead of intentionally driving the bus off a cliff.

      It’s good he stepped aside, but he waited till pretty much the last second and clearly didn’t want to hit the brakes.

      In that analogy, the heroes are all the people that got him to hit the brakes.

      • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        He could have shrugged it off like RBG did and fuck everyone for generations. Better late than never.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          5 months ago

          Better late than never.

          Obviously.

          But if a guy has a gun next to your head and ends up not pulling the trigger, are you gonna talk about how good your kidnapper was?

          You still got kidnapped, and you still had a gun to your head.

          Why thank the person who caused the problem and not the hostage negotiaters who got you released?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          34
          ·
          5 months ago

          So you think Biden and the DNC colluded and he always meant to stand down?

          He just waited until there wasn’t enough time for a primary so Kamala could get it?

          Don’t get me wrong, she’s got a better shot than Joe. But if you legitimately think they planned this timing…

          That’s not a good look.

          Especially for voters in NH who had their primary delegates stolen.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t think the timing was planned in advance.

            But I think he was getting tired, probably had enough commitments for support to Kamala (he probably gave everybody who demanded he steps down an ultimatum, support her or he stays), and decided there wasn’t going to be a better time to do it. Seems like he was right

            https://slrpnk.net/comment/10036679

          • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Or he waited until the Trump campaign sunk millions of dollars into a strategy that has now been completely subverted and which they have no real way out of without a massive pivot like dropping Trump which isn’t going to happen. If that’s the case, I’d call it a pretty savvy move.

              • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                If by that you mean “they followed the same standard procedure that’s been in place for the entire history of the United States” then yes, exactly.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        81
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        I didn’t call him a hero, though, I called him humble and good. In your zeal to urinate on corn flakes, you forgot basic reading skills.

      • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s an interesting analogy because objectively the bus driver is a hero for stopping a bus full of kids hurtling off a cliff.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          44
          ·
          5 months ago

          If he wasn’t the one flooring it headed right to the cliff…

          And if he didn’t take months of people telling him to hit the brakes while he screamed back only “Lord God” can stop the bus

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s a poor analogy because there’s no one on the bus trying to grab the wheel and hit the gas by force.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Absolutely nothing was stopping him from remaining in the race until the convention and becoming the official nominee. That was a viable path forward, if he had wanted to choose it. That he did not, deserves acknowledgement and respect.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I agree in principle with what you’re saying.

          However, a sitting president is not entitled to the nomination. It’s happened before where a sitting president is denied a nomination for a second term, and it’s been given to someone else in the party instead.

          If it had gone that way with Biden though, I think the optics would have been so bad that there would be no hopes of salvaging the election though, so it’s still praiseworthy that he dropped.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            5 months ago

            He was not going to be the nominee due to being the sitting president. He was going to be the nominee due to defeating his main rival “uncommitted” in the primaries, along with Rep. Dean Philips and Marianne Williamson.

            • qprimed@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              while technically true, had uncommited gotten more than 2 weeks to campaign and made it onto every ballot, the dems might not have had to modify the ticket this late.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah, I think there’s not nearly enough single-issue Palestine voters to make that happen. Also, it was a write-in campaign, it was never “on” a ballot anywhere.

                • qprimed@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  “uncommitted” / “no preference” were explicitly on some state ballots and palestine is a bigger culminating issue than people give credit for. “none of the above” running a distant, but meaningful, second is not encouraging.

                  regardless of your thoughts on biden in 2020, a diminished biden was a disaster for the Democrats and (potentially) the country in 2024.

            • Windex007@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Delegates are bound to support in all good conscience the person for whom their primaries results reflect.

              This bizzare turn of phrase has been largely been untested in the courts… But if, in good conscience, the delegates believe that the results of the primary were for the candidate who was best poised to defeat Trump (as in, they’re not supporting Biden specifically as much as they are against Trump, for example) then they could argue that based on events that have occured since the primaries that they are in good conscience representing those wishes.

              So, I dunno. I’m very glad Biden took the high road here, but I am unconvinced that this was truely set in stone. This is the exact justification for having delegates choose the nominee in the first place; that in certain critical conditions they can act in good faith.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I think that would be an extremely minority opinion far outside of the moderate dem mainstream. Since the electors get specifically chosen by the winning campaign, expecting some kind of broad revolt out of them is very wishful thinking.

                Additionally, Biden was polling very close to Trump during a time when dems have been outperforming polls in our recent elections. Someone would have to be fairly ignorant of the actual voting results of recent races to actually think Biden genuinely had no chance. I do not think very many chosen delegates are ignorant of these election results, unlike more casually-engaged citizens online.