• DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “MUH FREEDOM. FUCKIN COMMIES”

    I can just see the pavement princess brigade seething because their next emotional support penismobile won’t be exaggerated anymore and they will actually be able to see pedestrians and cyclists.

    • ghen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      As was designed by the people who actually wrote those laws, the lobbyists. More profitable cars to sell as America moves farther and farther away from reality with car prices.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    My dream car: An EV version of the 1955 Nash Metropolitan, seen here in this silly ad photo:

    (Sorry, it’s hard to find pictures that give a true indication of the smallness of the car. Also, mine would be the red and white two tone variety.)

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yes!

      Even that was in an era or needlessly ego-boosting giant cars, going utilitarian to get a better product, better lives on average, even save resources - amazing (but with the cardinal sin of not being expensive enough and thus not as financially profitable).

      For the same reason I would love to get a normally viable car of much smol.

      Like a bit more modern version of Figaro:

      Or a sexy mid-engine Autozam:

      Kei cars are qewl!

    • UnpledgedCatnapTipper@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I just want a tiny electric hatchback, like, Honda fit sized, that has like 150+ mile range, and doesn’t use an outdated charging standard. I’ve considered a Nissan Leaf but they are still sticking with the chademo charger port, which is way less common.

      • TownhouseGloryHole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 months ago

        Astounding. Hummer H2 beating the Sierra by 3m is incredible. A truck designed almost exclusively to express how selfish you are and it has better viability.

          • pemptago@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            GM marketing. They purchased the hummer brand from AM General. OG Hummer (later renamed H1) was based on AM General’s military Humvee design, but released to the civilian market. H2 and H3 were designed by GM for mass marketing. Can be seen in the price. H1 nearly 10x more than H2 and H3.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Also, the H1 was 10x better for what it was designed for than the H2 and H3.

              The H1 was not designed for commuting to work.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m not sure what it was designed for. It doesn’t have a lot of space for hauling compared to its size. It’s not great for offroading. It’s a plastic money extraction machine.

                • snooggums@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The original was designed to play military at home.it was not a pickup truck or a dedicated and modded offroad machine, and yes it was a money pit. But it was perfect for pretending with a civilian version of the vehicle manufacturrd on the same line as the real thing.

                  H2 and H3 models were just mediocre rebranded SUVs with hints of the original hummer body lines.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d be curious to see that chart for a Toyota Yaris. I drove one for a few years and it was almost unnerving how little hood it had.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s not to mention the optics.

      https://www.quora.com/Where-does-the-M1-Abrams-have-the-optics-of-its-main-cannon-I-dont-know-anything-about-tanks

      #4 is the optic for the RWS. This cannot be used to aim the main gun, but it can be used as an alternate form of CITV, especially since it’s so damned high off the ground, it may be able to see over obstacles. Not as good as CITV in the thermal range, though.

      That being said, some civilian vehicles are gonna have their own camera systems too, so…

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Civilian vehicles should all have thermals and a night driving HUD. If I’m paying 30,000 dollars then they can damn well put some actual stuff in there. Headlights being weaponized isn’t something we have to tolerate.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This is misleading because being higher up you can see much better further ahead, and over obstacles and barriers. Your special awareness is much better at distances that are relevant for avoiding collisions. If something is 1.5m away its too late anyway.

      The angle is also incorrect because they are putting the eyes of the driver straight in line with the hood, which is not how its been in any vehicle I’ve ever driven, the head should be higher or further forward.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        You don’t want to see “over” obstacles close to your vehicle when said obstacles are in fact human beings standing in front of your car.

        At parking lot speeds, 1.5 meters is also not “too late,” and it certainly isn’t when you are at a standstill but need to determine if it is safe to move or if there is a small person in front of your vehicle, i.e. in the school pickup line, or in a parking lot, or your own driveway.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Ooo ooo we can do it like buses do. We’ll put a bar on the front that folds out. 3 year olds totally know what that is right? They’ll just get out of the way!

          (/s)

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        3 months ago

        The origin of the line is at head height…

        Also these vehicles gain in distant visibility at the expense of everyone else on the road, blocking their views.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          The best way to avoid getting into an accident is to see it long before you get there. But situational awareness is not something the vast majority of drivers actually practice or have…

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bumper height needs to be standardized so they match up properly. One of the biggest safety issues is how modern SUV bumpers don’t align with cars bumper bars.

    • helopigs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe this is the point, but that might cause SUVs to be prohibitively unsafe, because their center of momentum would be so high relative to impact height. For example, if an SUV with one of these low bumpers hit a barrier, it would probably perform a front flip over it 😂

    • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      My Sequoia is like 2.5x the size of my Honda fit. If I ever hit my Honda while pulling into the driveway I’ll total it.

      I fully agree with your statement.

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Do you like your Sequoia? I have been thinking about trading in my Explorer for one. Or an Expedition.

        Know this is a hate thread about SUV’s, but those of us with large families don’t have any other options.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have a 2012 platinum it’s amazing. I get 12-15mpg…lol yea I have a 5 person family with the 7 seater Sequoia.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    They need to do that here too in Australia

    If you’re driving a larger vehicle, you should be putting in more care.

    But they don’t seem to here in Australia. They’ll park badly and put less effort into fixing it than a small sedan

    It’s tiring that this is even still a thing

  • CondensedPossum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “One of the last frontiers of vehicle safety” If you’re going to post this sort of stuff where people can see it, maybe you could cover it with Content Warnings and Propaganda tags?

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yay we will have the return of small trucks. These behemoths are good for towing and work, but not everyday driving.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I want so much to ditch my Jeep Grand Cherokee for a truck (I drive to work once a week but pull a camper on the weekends), sadly a lot of them might not fit in my 1970’s garage.

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of the behemoths aren’t even good as utilitary vehicles…

      I’ve got a 15yo Renault Kangoo which could beat almost any oversized suburban pedestrian flattener in all metrics except price.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey buddy! Without a Ford F150 that’s taller than the average elementary school student and a box that can barely fit an average grocery store trip, how else am I supposed to tell people I have a tiny penis?

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    As it is the US has no pedestrian safety standards at the federal level. I’m pretty sure if GM wanted to put out a truck with running chainsaws all over it then it would be perfectly legal as far as the NHTSA is concerned, although some state regulators might have a problem with it which is probably why it doesn’t happen in reality.

    • modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re in the process of describing a Cybertruck, just the misfitting panel ‘teeth’ aren’t rotating

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why do little cars have to withstand a collision with a huge truck but trucks just get bigger and bigger? The new Hummer is over 9,000lbs (4,090 kg)

      • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean they’re getting heavier, but not, like, whole number multiples heavier. An electric might be some 60% heavier than a comparable gas car. But the aforementioned hummer is more than 5 times heavier than even a heavy electric “utility vehicle”. That’s more than 400% heavier.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Huh? Are you saying heavy electric utility vehicles are less than 2k lbs? I think you’re math is a bit off, or I’m misunderstanding you. 9k lbs is heavy but it’s only around 2k lbs heavier than it’s gas counter parts (most SUVs are around 6.5-7k lbs). Most electric cars are 1-2k lbs heavier than their gas counterparts already. Batteries are not light.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m saying smaller cars are usually lighter than bigger cars, even when the smaller cars are electric. And the car I was comparing to was the Chevrolet bolt “electric utility vehicle” that’s trying to be an electric SUV. Which is 1600 kg.

            Where a Ford fiesta that’s almost the same size is still 1100 kg.

            Edit: corrected units to kg.

            • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Chevy Bolt (electric) is approx. 3,600 lbs. Ford Fiesta (gas) is approx. 2,500 lbs. I think your numbers are kilograms. Sorry to be pedantic, just trying to get correct numbers. But what you’re saying is basically correct. Most small EVs are still lighter than midsize and bigger ICE cars. If you want apples to apples: the 2024 Chevy Equinox EV is 5,000 lbs, whereas the 2024 gas version is approx. 3,400 lbs.

              • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh, shit, you’re right. I was looking at kilograms. Thank you.

                But yeah, the point stands that small cars are lighter and safer than big cars, especially for the things they hit.

    • HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Regardless of truck size, I don’t think tractor trailers are going anywhere. Even if we made trucks smaller those would still be out there

      Smaller trucks would still get in accidents though, and I imagine they would be less deadly

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Even if we made trucks smaller those would still be out there

        If we made them smaller there’d just be more of them on the road. There’d also be higher prices for everything to compensate for the extra expense of having those extra trucks and bodies to pilot them.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Man, if only we could separate freight from commuter traffic. Like, imagine if all those tractor trailers were on their own separate road, but make it out of, IDK, metal or something so it can withstand the weight better. You could even just have metal right under the wheels, to reduce costs. But what do I know, I’m just some pie in the sky nobody who doesn’t know what he’s talking about

        • MasterMediasRes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          That sounds like a neat idea—here’s a wild thought, what would happen if we tried the same thing with passengers? Eh, you’re right, sounds positively un-American.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Unless you’re going to run train tracks to every business in existence, freight will need to be moved using a semi at some point.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think getting semis off the highway where they’re going 60-70 mph would make a big difference in highway safety though. And you could have less semis going from depots to stores if stores were smaller and more frequent, such that deliveries could be made via cargo vans rather than semis.

        • pemptago@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not to mention it would reduce all the underride crashes.

          All these improved vehicle safety standards are generally for bumper-to-bumper collisions, not windshield-to-truck-bed. Frontline released a well-done 2023 episode on it. Highly recommend.

          Edit: md link

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tractor trailers are heavily regulated with training, licensing, driving hours and sleep break logging etc. Are they really a significant source of pedestrian collisions?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You should check out the safety stuff with them and cars. You’ll stay near one on the road again.

    • krippix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      wtf in Europe that thing couldn’t be driven with a regular class B drivers license

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Commercial license requirements for full sized trucks over a certain size and weight would be an excellent solution. In addition to the increased effort and cost to get one, commercial licenses are way easier to lose.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree. It’s felt weird each time I’ve rented a moving truck and was able to drive it myself. They are giant and I’m not used to driving something so big plus no visibility out of the rear of the vehicle. And on top of that, they are so massive that mistakes will hurt more and will be harder to notice while they are happening.

          Though even normal licenses are too easy IMO. I haven’t been tested or trained on driving in decades. Most people don’t know how 2 way stop signs work, I’ve even had a cop wave me through when it was their right of way. The bar should be higher for getting and keeping a license and lower for losing it. And “but people need cars to get to work and such” addressed with better mass transportation and city planning.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It depends on the state, but it usually is. It’s just very high, like a gvwr of 26k lbs.

          Thing is, a CDL covers a bunch of stuff you really don’t need to know for something smaller than that, like air brakes. That said, some kind of graduated licensing is called for, here.

          Motorcycles, too, while we’re at it. It’s insane that you can go through MSF and then immediately buy a literbike.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            In ny US state motorcycles have a special motorcycle license. Maybe that would be a good starting point for a large vehicle permit that is more than a regilar license.

  • rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This seems like it could lead to significant innovation in vans in North America, or set least US/Canada. Van pickups, van sedans, van Goghs? After the initial temper tantrums, I think people will buy whatever comes out of the design phase. There used to be a lot of “beef” about emission control devices, but not so much anymore. Those folks moved on.