Summary

At the first meeting of the DOGE Caucus, a new congressional group focused on government efficiency, Republican Rep. Greg Lopez stated that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are likely “on the table” as part of debt reduction efforts.

The caucus, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to slash government spending, raising concerns among advocacy groups about potential attacks on anti-poverty programs.

Critics, including Social Security Works, warn the caucus may push for privatization and benefit reductions.

This comes despite Trump’s prior commitment to protect these programs.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    doesn’t need to be, of course. they just want to cut social security because ‘the poors’ rely on it more.

    debt reduction efforts

    deep-six every loophole used mostly or only by the wealthy to avoid paying their share of taxes.

    increase funding for irs, streamline enforcement actions, give them the resources needed to go after the big fish.

    eliminate the cap on social security contributions, lower the ceiling on benefits for the very wealthy retirees, while raising the minimum benefit.

    single payer tax funded health care, paid by higher taxes on the wealthy.

    raise the capital gains rates. raise the estate tax, lower the assets value needed to trigger it.

    raise the marginal rates for high income earners (by a lot. i want reagan screaming from beyond)

    budget problem fixed. well over $2 trillion a year pumped into the economy by people who are now no longer padding insurance companies’ bottom lines with it. but we aren’t done yet…

    $12/hr min wage (wait wut!!! wait for it…)

    $24,000 universal tax credit for everyone. the higher taxes up^there on high income earners would negate this for them, and they fund it for the others that do receive it.

    this is a compromise between the $15 (or higher) crowd and small businesses. a little lower fed min wage than what’s being pushed, but then essentially doubled based on full time work via the tax credit all receive.

    • einlander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      This could end badly for them. Old people without a means to continue surviving either have to continue working till they die, or die fighting the government.

        • einlander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’m not even touching on those on SSDI. Just the common retired 67 year old. Just imagine a retired Walmart worker with no SSI income. Way too many of them with nothing else to do other than die; be homeless, suffer and die; or die taking in the government.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Bill reacted to his death and resurrection into the Entity’s Realm by treating it like Valhalla

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The wealthy, who have had help all their life but imagine they did it all on their own, see needing help when you’re poor as a disgusting moral failing. Many of them will also call themselves Christians.

  • VanillerGoriller@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Disabled people will be first to be killed by this. It is already a Herculean task to be approved for SSDI and takes years for many despite clearly documented and proven disabilities. And it does not pay out enough for most recipients. That will only get worse if SSA is targeted. I am not legally allowed to state my opinion on this.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Interestingly enough, social security’s disability trust fund has enough money to continue paying out until 2098; it’s the old person part that’s running out.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        It should also be mentioned that it wouldn’t be running out if they didn’t cap the taxable income at $168,000. If you make $168,000 a year you pay the same social security tax as every millionaire and billionaire. BuT iTs InSoLvEnT

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          It also wouldn’t be running out of wages hadn’t been stagnating for the last several decades.

          As more and more people earn less and less of the country’s output, that means more of it is above that cap, in the hands of the rich, and never put into the fund.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Eat those faces or at least scare the hell out of those faces, my pretties.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hopefully they stop all those subsidies that go towards farms and we all starve and die.

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know a lot of bitter Boomers with bad health and nothing to lose, this could be an interesting year.

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      All they have to do is tell them the reason it has to be done is LIBRULS and boom. All anger directed at Nancy Pelosi, all is forgotten.

      • Breve@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yup, all Trump has to do is say how the cuts would have been way worse under Kamala and the brainwashed masses eat it up without a single critical thought.

    • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      I hate to tell you but it won’t. My in-laws fall into that category and I constantly watch them twist themselves into knots trying to justify this stuff. They would also rather do without insurance than watch someone “undeserving” get it for “free”.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They will blame immigrants, single mothers, non-whites and LGBTQ+ people, and ignore the facts.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, they want to roll back the entire New Deal and have corporate serfdom again. They have been saying it for years and now they have their chance.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hope everyone remembers to not negotiate with capitalists next time we have a labor movement like we had in the early 20th century.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        And don’t split up into competing trades-based unions. That enables divide-and-rule.

    • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      More and more I feel we are seeing the pendulum swing. Normally we see 5-10 year cycles of push and pull along the political spectrum, but I’m becoming increasingly convinced we’re in a century long cycle too.

      We no longer have those with living memory of the gilded age, losing those who remember the saving grace that was the New Deal, and fewer and fewer left who were sent to war to fight fascism. Meanwhile the wealth gap is worsening in developed nations across the world, democratic republics are electing more far right parties and authoritarian leaders with populist messages, and the incoming administration is floating the idea of scrapping the FDIC and deregulating anything else on his favorite billionaire’s wishlist.

      Seems like we’re right on track for a repeat of the 1930s.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    The House R’s have a very tiny majority and their constituents will not be happy about this idea and will let them know it. So I feel like they won’t be able to get the votes to do it. I also think they’re going to prioritze things like more tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations first, as well as the border stuff, before they would get to that. Ya never know, but that’s what I’m hoping for.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The House R’s have a very tiny majority

      You’re assuming there aren’t 20 Dems who will join them.

  • CitricBase@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    233
    ·
    4 days ago

    Friendly reminder that Social Security is a separate government program that funds itself.

    What Musk is talking about is stealing from Social Security in order to cut taxes elsewhere (namely cutting taxes for people like Musk).

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      How does it fund itself? What’s the income? Just Social Security Tax?

      • CitricBase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, it’s a payroll tax. Your paycheck may show how much you are paying into Social Security. This is money meant to help you and others after retirement. Musk wants to take that money and instead use it to fill unrelated gaps in the federal budget, gaps caused by Trump’s tax cuts for the very wealthy.

        • pound_heap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Social Security fund invested in government bonds, so the interest from that goes into the fund.

          To be fair the budget deficit was there before Trump. His campaign promises are going to increase it, but they can offset that partially with spending cuts. Also, the government has been using money from the Social Security fund routinely, again nothing new under Trump. They just count it as an internal debt. According to Wikipedia, by 2022 it’s been already about 20% of the fund “borrowed” by the government.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            This is one of the rare cases where I want to laugh at the silly US, but can’t because our “scial security” (we call it “retirement savings”) is being missapropriated for general funds as well :(

            I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

            • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

              Social Security got the structure it has after the Great Depression wiped… well, you know. Everyone. Out.

              I’m sure your private equity will be run much more responsibly throughout your life though, no need for some big ol’ stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything. Carry on!

              • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                no need for some big ol’ stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything.

                I still have the government guaranteed pension as well, not as if I could opt out even if I wanted to, which I don’t.

                The concept of the day: Diversification!

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It doesn’t fund itself, but it’s a completely separate fund [bucket of money] than the rest of the government budget, with a specific tax that goes directly to it and nothing else.

      • CitricBase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        119
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think a good start would be to stop allowing Republicans to raid Social Security for quick cash, like they’ve been constantly doing since the Reagan administration.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s not completely true. Long ago they put it into the general fund. There is always a shortfall in the general fund. Before they put it in there it was solvent, and if they wouldn’t have it would be completely solvent today.

        It was already stolen. They want the rest.

      • 4grams@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        We had our chance a little over a month ago. Now our only hope is their own incompetence.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Right now, it is looking like we have missed our chance to do much about it. The only other options on the table are pretty grim.

  • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    Lovely how this incredibly wealthy person is laser focused on making things worse for poor people. I suppose it’s the usual ploy of making people as desperate as possible so people like him can prey on us more easily.

  • Geobloke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s funny, I listened to Steve Bannon’s war room the other day and he was demanding that they not touch social security and go after the elites and the NGOs instead. Can’t imagine this will play well with the voters that swung towards the republicans

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      So Bannon’s the Röhm of this administration? Interesting to see when and how they give him the shove.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      oh i’m sure the voters will do the same thing they always do.

      Rabidly support it until its too late, then go full “I didnt think he was going to hurt MY social security! Its not me hes supposed to be hurting! Its the poors! and the minorities! Why is he hurting me?! I’m a loyal supporter!”

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wow! Who woulda guessed they would immediately reneg on a campaign “promise” and immediately attack the side of the population that most reliably votes for them?