Summary

Representative Sarah McBride, the first out trans congresswoman, criticized Donald Trump’s executive order defining gender as strictly male or female.

McBride points out that biologically all embryos develop as female until the SRY gene activates weeks after conception.

The order, which ties gender to reproductive cells at conception, unintentionally categorizes all humans as female from conception based on biological facts.

McBride’s remarks highlight scientific flaws in the policy.

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure what is more disconcerting. That the people in charge truly are a bunch of fucking idiots.

    Or that those idiots have outplayed and outsmarted the Democrats at damn near every turn for 20+ years.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      One team is trying to govern, and the other team is trying to win.

      If Democrats lied constantly, denied science, sowed fear and hatred, and used the law to enforce their personal religious beliefs… They’d be indistinguishable from Republicans.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      The President in particular is very much a figurehead — he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it.
      – The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They didn’t outsmart them, they just are trying to destroy everything. Their actions aren’t bounded by such qualifiers as “good things happening”.

    • ArtemisimetrA@lemmy.duck.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This assumes the Democrats aren’t also keenly aware of what is happening and either doing a real sorry job of putting up any viable opposition or are in on the game. The two-party system is a front

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump: “You must identify with the gender you were at the time of conception.”

    Science: “Everyone starts out as women and don’t become men until 6 weeks after conception.”

    Trump: “That is exactly what I meant. Everyone who knows science must identify as a girly girl.”

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Trump decided he wanted to be the first female president obviously. Don’t you liberals understand 5d chess!?

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        18 hours ago

        “Trump beat Hilary to being the first woman president” is honestly hilarious to me. Sad, but also hilarious.

    • WordBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Can anyone clarify how the 6wk part override the zygote being XX or XY at conception? (Automod deleted my last inquiry)

      The chromosomes being set at conception seems to be the sticking point for those in favor.

      • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Trumps EO states that sex is no longer determined by chromosomes and is now done by reproductive organs. Someone please correct me if im wrong.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          You’re correct.

          Although the technical wording isn’t exactly specifying organs, but rather the capacity of the organs to produce either the “large” or “small” reproductive cells (egg/sperm)

          It defines “Sex” as someone’s “immutable biological classification as either male or female,” but the classification “Male” or “Female” then uses the term “belonging […] to the sex that-” which effectively means that sex is someone’s biological classification as either belonging to the sex that […], where sex is someone’s biological classification as either belonging to the sex that… and so on.

          The definitions themselves genuinely repeat endlessly, but even with a charitable reading, assuming that, for instance, instead of “biological classification” it was “biological classification based on physical characteristics,” which is how the definitions of male/female seem to be worded, it still could possibly classify everyone as sexless, since nobody produces those cells at conception.

  • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I KNEW IT!

    I’M A LESBIAN!!!

    I’ve known my whole life and it’s a relief to FINALLY to be able to come out officially.

    THANK YOU PRESIDENT RUMP!

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Donvict and his supporters (yeah, I know, don’t blame the precious voters!) don’t really understand science.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Someone should sue JD Vance for addressing Trump as Mr. President. Illegally addressing him as a man. Clearly sewing doubt in the direct orders of the president, it’s detrimental to the entire country.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think the bigger issue is hiding in plain sight:

    a person belonging, at conception

    Personhood does not begin at conception.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t that every despot’s idea, though? Make all laws used to control people nebulous enough that they can be applied to anyone for whatever reason? Just because it’s inept doesn’t mean it isn’t useful.

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s an easy way to redefine this. If Trump can grab you by it, and you just let it happen because he’s a star, you’re a woman.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “This is logically flawed because <drops a stack of biology textbooks on the table>” won’t really bother a bunch of Young Earth Creationists. You’re arguing with people who will retreat to the baseline argument “because God said so” in a pinch. Getting into the messy details of embryonic development won’t save you, because that’s not how their nominations to the FBI, the DOJ, or the Federal Judiciary are going to interpret any of it.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 day ago

        Actually it being poorly written helps a lot with court challenge. That was one of the reasons why so much was overturned in his first administration. There was a fear that this time he’d sign better written executive orders that would survive challanges instead we’re getting a lot of them like this

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            There are already groups that have pledge lawsuits on this specific executive orders. The courts don’t just decide to do a lawsuit, people and organizations

            Others have already filed multiple lawsuits on multiple of his executive orders. There’s 4 different lawsuits already filed against his one trying to overturn birthright citizenship for instance. ACLU, group of 22 state attorney generals, separate group of states, and some other orgs.

            Also note that they’re also filing many of these in courts with more dem appointees who are much more likely to grant injunctions, rule favorably, etc. This is a tactic called judge shoping that republicans have historically loved to exploit and now it’s being used against them. Most cases never reach SCOTUS so this stuff matters. SCOTUS can only take up so many cases with 9 justices and there’s already massive numbers of suits here

        • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          You think the supreme court won’t side with whatever schlock trump puts out? You should listen to a few of their hearings. The ones on free speech and transgender issues are specifically telling.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Not all cases make it up to SCOTUS. Massive numbers of suits are being filed right now, they can’t take them all up with just 9 justices. Many of these lawsuit are intentionally filed in places with more dem appointees on the district and appeals courts

            SCOTUS is insane, but they are also not in lock step with Trump. They have their own agenda that often align with Trump but not always. For instance, they just ruled 9-0 on the TikTok ban while Trump was calling for the courts to rule the opposite way

            We won’t we every fight, but there’s fights we can win. Use every tool we can against them

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              For instance, they just ruled 9-0 on the TikTok ban while Trump was calling for the courts to rule the opposite way

              https://newrepublic.com/post/190366/gorsuch-supreme-court-tiktok-ban

              “But the question we face today is not the law’s wisdom, only its constitutionality. Given just a handful of days after oral argument to issue an opinion, I cannot profess the kind of certainty I would like to have about the arguments and record before us. All I can say is that, at this time and under these constraints, the problem appears real and the response to it not unconstitutional,” Gorsuch continued

        • cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          The truth is, they don’t care how poorly written it is, they’re just trying to flood the zone with stuff, and they win no matter the outcome. If it’s not challenged, they have policy, if it is challenged, it occupies time and resources and most importantly, if it’s challenged unsuccessfully, they have legal precident.

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            And every challenge is a chance to kick it up all the way to the Supreme Court where it can be enshrined as constitutional precedent.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            it is challenged, it occupies time and resources

            It also takes up their time and resources to which I say: good. Slow it all down

            They’d rather be able to steam roll through it all. Make them waste time defending everything so they can’t sue as much about things they do care about or move on to putting other things in effect

            • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              It also takes up their time and resources

              It’s YOUR TIME AND RESOURCES! They do it on public employee time and with tax money. They are weaponizing the state against the people. There isn’t an upside to this.

              • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                So stand down and never fight? Absolutely not

                There is a fight, don’t let them go without one

                Progress will happen at the local and state level. The goal at the federal level is damage control

            • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is where I’m at too. Even rubber stamping shit takes a non zero amount of time. We should be bouncing back anything that has so much as a misplaced comma, let alone shit like this.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No it doesn’t slow them down. They will do the fucking thing anyway. Why do you think they’d stop just because they used the wrong wording?

              Who the fuck is going to stop them?

              • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                It has slowed them before. Make them have to keep rewriting it to survive challenges

                Make them deal with the companies who don’t trust the next admin won’t just go the opposite way. Apple for instance is keeping TikTok delisted from the App Store despite trump trying to extend it

                Make them have to deal with federal worker strikes

                Make them have to deal with local & state officals who won’t comply with invalid orders

                There is a fight. Don’t let them get away without one

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  It has slowed them before. Make them have to keep rewriting it to survive challenges

                  How is it not already abundantly clear that this is not “before.” There is no precedent for what is currently happening

                  Who “makes” them exactly? This is fascism now. The person with the biggest army gets what they want, and everyone else better shut the fuck up or die.

            • cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              They have more time and resources as many of the challenges are spun off and subcontracted to their cronies. And they don’t especially care if things grind to a halt, that’s also a win for them, they can play victim to the public with it and scream about how they really want to get on with running a government.

              • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                Many of the orgs fighting them also aren’t governmental like the ACLU, the EFF, and other groups. Plus even localities like cities are even filing lawsuits against his EOs

                Biden had tons of his stuff blocked in courts and got all the blame for the courts blocking it. The public isn’t really good at paying attention to why something happened only that it didn’t

                • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Yeah, Biden got blamed because his orders failed in courts that were stacked by Trump, pointing to it like it was a sign of his incompetence.

                  Dems will be blamed for Trump’s agenda being stalled causing any and all problems for people stemming from his policies that do go through.

                  They’re great at twisting everything against the Dems (and, honestly, the Dems suck at pushing back in any effectual manner)

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The average intelligence of his hanger ons has dropped through the floor. Not to say there arent some possibly smart ones but those ones are probably having to spend way more energy keeping themselves sane, imagine being stuck in a room with both Trump and Musk youd have to expend so much willpower just to not go into a suicidal and homocidal rage.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This exactly. It’s disconcerting to see how many people seem to be laughing this off.

        They have zero interest in logic and consistency. We know what they mean, the actual words they used don’t matter.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    I feel like an invulnerable Goddess, in my sleep Trump tried to turn me into a man. I went Ultra Instinct and slapped that shit without waking up, and when I finally do get up I find that the whole country is one giant lesbian slumber party.

  • zabadoh@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    We’d all better march down to the DMV and update our genders then…

    It’s required by imperial edict now.

  • kablammy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    18 hours ago

    At least McBride can now use the women’s restrooms in the Capitol. And so must all the other politicians!

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Its so stupid that the government of one of the world’s most powerful countries is occupying itself trying to restrict people’s healthcare and bathroom usage based on some poorly understood and arbitrary rules about zygotes. Meanwhile, the planet burns.