Summary

Democratic lawmakers, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, criticized Trump for failing to address rising food costs despite campaign promises to lower prices “immediately.”

In a letter, they accused Trump of focusing on mass deportations and January 6 pardons instead of tackling grocery inflation, which rose 1.8% in 2024, with egg prices up 36.8%.

Trump’s administration defended its actions, citing efforts to reduce inflation by cutting energy costs.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            This doesn’t change the fact that Republicans control all three branches of government right now.

            Voters could have changed that, but they didn’t.

            They were probably all protesting the sleepy Dems right? So they all got what they wanted right?

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                You know, he actually passed some of the most monumental legislation in decades, a lot of it with bipartisan support. But because we are not living on the starship enterprise here you are as usual shitting on everything and everyone.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  You know, he actually passed some of the most monumental legislation in decades

                  He passed the IRA, which was a consolation prize for Democrats killing BBB. You might be satisfied with the same legislation that manchin was willing to vote for. I saw what Democrats killed. BBB never came to the floor for a vote. I’m sure you’re satisfied that minimum wage stayed low like you want it.

                  As for the “bipartisan support,” yeah, democrats voted for some republican legislation like the anti-trans defense bill.

                  But because we are not living on the starship enterprise here you are as usual shitting on everything and everyone.

                  “Don’t support genocide.” “Fucking progressives expect perfection.”

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Since it’s not expressly forbidden in the rules, and the referee is friends with the republicans, (and also someone who has money riding on the outcome has promised to pay them), the democrats have no choice but to shrug and say the next game is going to be the most important one yet, while seating a player that has no clue how to play

      • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean of course, because the game that’s actually going on is real life and not chess. If you saw a guy playing chess by himself in the park and a dude runs up and let loose on the board, who won? The guy who just lost twelve and a half pounds or the guy sitting in it saying “hmmm, the Dennis Prager gambit?”

        • AntiThesis@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s gotta be one of the most hilariously and depressingly accurate descriptions of the situation I’ve seen

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 days ago

    Everytime I ask a republican what it is that Trump is doing that will help with prices they say ‘wait and see!’ like he is going to pull some sort of magic trick.

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      For some reason the Republicans voters I know seem to think that their party is going to pass all the regulatory legislation that that Democrats were suggesting.

      I just don’t understand them. How did they get this brainwashed? It’s not just frustrating. It’s depressing.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same “Oh there’s a plan, it’s just a long term one.”

      I guess that makes sense, afterall, if he de-humanizes enough transpeople all our groceries will become free, that’s just logic! /sarcasm

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The very second prices come down on their own, with nothing Trump did affecting it, he and his cult will point and say “SEE?!”

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just do the same thing they did. Print stickers of Trump saying ‘I did this’ pointing to high prices of things like eggs.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wanted to do this but I gotta figure out how to print my own because the prices I’ve been seeing on those are ludicrous for stickers.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s crazy to see “price of eggs!” as a talking point appear on every major broadcaster a month before the election as the defacto rubric for economic strength. Then trillions invested in Western based AI gets obliterated within a week of the new administration taking office.

      • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well since 50% of Americans don’t own stocks and 93% is owned by the top 10%, eggs definitely affect the average person more.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          A factory worker may not own a single share of stock and still rationally express concerned when the firm’s stock price plummets.

          The enormous upfront investment of capital in a rapidly outdated administration model should be extremely alarming to individuals whose employment is predicated on the output of that model.

          • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Are you trying to say that people being fired from Nvidia is more important than egg prices? Maybe let me check how many employees they have. Seems to be about 30k. Idk man comparing human experiences at this scale gets pretty sticky. Maybe it’s just confirmation bias, but egg prices and by extension grocery prices are probably more important to the average person. Infact they even affect Nvidia employees that are fired.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Are you trying to say that people being fired from Nvidia is more important than egg prices?

              People from Nvidia, from Facebook, from Microsoft, from all the attendant businesses surrounding those firms.

              Compound this with the consequences of money invested into AI at both the private and public levels that was supposed to supplement neglected spending in basic science R&D on the ground that AI could do R&D better (because it’s God? Idk)

              So there’s a knock on effect to egg prices, given that the egg shortage is driven by Bird Flu and we’re neglecting Bird Flu to build AI God.

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    Meanwhile all lawmakers had gains in stocks larger than the average Joe. The fuck they care about prices

    • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      What exactly do you want them to do? What legislation can they pass when they don’t control the House or Senate?

      How do you expect a political party to solve a crisis caused by private industry? Should they pass legislation against bird flu? More regulations for the poultry industry?

      Since you are so smart, what should they do? And how can they fight the majority party that is antagonistic towards everything the democrats try to do?

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        The Democrats can use Democracy. Require that corporate boards in America vote in their members through employee elections. It’s a slim minority of power grubbers that would want to keep raising prices against the poor.

        By the way, the senator making this shouting proposed exactly that bill. It didn’t make it anywhere, because people don’t vote in senate majorities letting them pass such things.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah, I’m on your side. The Republicans are blatantly ruining this country and breaking the law and the best we can do is just say “hey stop” and then “slam” them in a nothing of consequence article.

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah cuz dems really did a good job of holding down grocery prices and stopping price gouging

    Fucking stop grandstanding and actually do something useful.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah i want them to actually put up a fight not just roll over and let trump tickle their bellies.

        But nah we will just get 4 more years of them saying “see we aren’t as bad as that” even though they did fuck all when they had power except launch a genocide

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You see, when Democrats hold both chambers and the presidency they are powerless against their centrists, but when Republicans do the Democrats are also powerless to stop Democratic centrists from defecting and cancelling out the last 3 Republicans with a vague sense of ethics.

      Weird how that works.

      (The point is the government is thoroughly controlled by conservatives either way)

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    When I read talking points like this, I think about: Who would they convince? I don’t think many people honestly believe Democrats had a capable plan to fix these grocery prices in the first month of a Kamala presidency. Yes, Trump over-promised, and unfortunately, that was probably the right tactic.

    I’m still not absolving voters for falling for such snake oil though. Sometimes when grandma clicks the “You have a virus” prompt for the 400th time you have to start blaming her.

    Actually, the last important bit to me is who exactly is saying this. Recalling from memory, Elizabeth Warren once put forward a suggestion to require that 40% of a company’s board be voted in by employees. It’s very possible that with a less corrupt, profit-seeking corporate landscape we wouldn’t be in this situation. So even more than Kamala she may have credit to blame others for such things.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    The con man who sells shoes, NFTs, launched a meme coin and bankrupted a casino was never going to lower prices on anything. Fools got played!

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          The past is gone, the now is republicans. I know it’s hard to remember, but they’re in control of everything. The voters could have also not voted trump in, why not get mad at them?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            The voters could have also not voted trump in, why not get mad at them?

            This is so completely upside down it hurts. “Why punch up when you could punch down?”

            Even if voters were the ones at fault, it’s completely pointless and unproductive to blame the public at large because changing their behavior is a hell of a lot harder than changing the behavior of the handful of people running the campaign. They should be the ones to change based on what the voters want, it shouldn’t be the voters who have to change based on what politicians want to do!

            • _stranger_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah, but that point is in the past. And back then, a whole shitload of people decided it wasn’t worth their time/energy/feelings to vote for the not-a-nazi.

              The reality of now is that no one can do shit. Feel free to post more theory about how shit should work. It won’t amount to shit, we’re in fascist oligarchy times. You’re not going to change their behavior.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            dude that was a few months ago. =) they literally wasted 4 years. again. I’m pissed because my entire adult life the democrats have been worse than ineffectual at improving the american baseline. The republicans managed to take all 3 branches because of how piss poor democrats have been at representing their base. after harris’ disgusting behavior on the campaign trail and biden absolute disgusting policies w/ respect to israel im basically done with the DNC at the national level, they can rot.

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Harris had disgusting behavior on the campaign trail? She didn’t piss me off until she said “Fuck confirming judges or demanding recounts or investigations, I’m going to Hawaii!”

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Yes. Her campaign shit all over Muslim americans. She refused to condem or even admit to the genocide. She repeatedly tried to gaslight americans over bidens mental fitness. And completely ignored the economic hardships many are experiencing. Wouldn’t commit to keeping ms khan because her family member was under investigation by the ftc.

                Absolutely disgusting. Never mind the fact she had no real policies positions that would have improved anything.

                And then on top of all that nonsense, palling around with Cheney. And rank and file members immediately throwing lgbt+ under the bus post election in an attempt to deflect responsibility for the loss because of their shit policies.

                Dont get me started about actions she took over the last 4 years as VP.

                But she and the dnc lost because they refuse to acknowledge how absolutely pissed americans workers are atm. And keep trying to gaslight us.

                • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It’s telling how much they downvote your sensible take

                  Keep on it guys! If downvotes were real votes, you’d surely win the election!

                • _stranger_@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Yeah a bunch of people were pissed off. They should have voted for her anyway. The choice was shit, or radioactive shit. Personally, I’m kind of fucking furious over everyone with the privilege of washing their hands of participation because they knew they wouldn’t feel the consequences.

                  The sad truth is that everything you posted is right, and it still wasn’t the reason she lost. A third of the country just didn’t fucking vote. And it wasn’t even in protest.

  • Norgoroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Dude that top ring frog splash from Bernie took me by surprise, then the tombstone SLAM from warren

  • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Democratic National Committee, don’t just stick to your old tired playbook of telling everyone that Trump is bad and doing the things he said he’d do. It didn’t work last time.

    DNC, start immediately telling all Americans why this is wrong, what you will do different with the executive power, and keep up that messaging in a media blitz to win back all the working class voters who didn’t show up last time. Get a plan now for who you want to run on your ticket, and push them into the spotlight to advocate for us with progressive policies that help the working class. I’m a dreamer, but for the love of all things good, please let them be an actual progressive.

    “We are the Democratic Party. Democrats are fighting for a better, fairer, and brighter future for every American: rolling up our sleeves, empowering grassroots voters, and organizing everywhere to build a better America.”

    Really? Fucking prove it, then! Be the party of brawlers and stop maintaining “decorum”. MAGA is playing dirty because you’re weak and they know you won’t do shit. Fight for the working class like your mission statement alleges.

    So tired of backsliding to the right on this tilted table.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Inflation rose globally and the US was able to do the biggest inflation reduction within the G7. I’m sorry we’re not living on the starship enterprise in some comunal utopia and there are still imperfections in the world

  • urno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honestly, it’s almost embarrassing. Democrats continue to fight using Queensberry whilst Trump et al are, again, acting with impunity. They’ve got to smell the coffee and take the gloves off.

    • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Take the gloves off right now and do what?

      Use harsh language? Encourage Democrats to engage in acts of violence?

      I understand your frustration of feeling helpless while the tangerine terror fucks everything and everyone up, but without control of the house and/or senate, there isn’t that much they can do right now.

      • urno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think they need to be aggressive, publicly, with their highlighting of Trump’s “shortcomings”. Like billboards. Or interviews on TV. Or (ab)using privilege in the House. Etc. Just say stuff that’s true that they wouldn’t normally want to say. “Trump finger raped a woman”, “Putin’s lapdog”, “Pornstar fucker”, “Friend to pedophiles”.

        In your face shit that’s inappropriate. Or was inappropriate until Trump changed the rules.

        Just keep repeating it day after day, and like Trump, it’ll become part of the narrative through repetition.

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            The media gets high on sensationalism. If a Democratic politician came out and said that the President was “deep-throating Putin’s cock,” oh believe me, that’d get coverage right quick!

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                I dunno man, your stance comes across as defeated, like nothing is worth doing. I disagree with that take.

                • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Wounded but not defeated.

                  There certainly is lots that can be done. Just aware that there is an uphill battle to be fought, and the number of allies is limited.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          This is the same playbook they’ve been using since Trump first appeared and it doesn’t work. People don’t care that much about Trump’s scandals, they need to focus on economic messaging. Besides, he’s ineligible to run again so they need to have a strategy aimed at countering the right more broadly, not just one specific person.

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Saying he’s a “sexual predator” and that he “finger-raped a woman” are far from the same thing. One is dry and intellectual, the other conjures up memorable mental imagery. It’s the same way that “damp” and “moist” can be synonyms, but only one of them squicks a lot of people.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s ridiculous. You’re thinking way too small, you can’t just use the same line of attack over and over again with slightly different phrasing and expect it to suddenly start working.

              Trump repeatedly crossed lines that were supposed to tank his campaign. You can’t just chalk that up to some people using slightly less visceral language than you think they should have. The reason nothing sticks to him is because people have decided, “We don’t care how much of a dirtbag he is, because he’s our dirtbag.” The only thing that can challenge that is to attack him on economics and demonstrate how he isn’t actually working towards people’s interests, and in order to do that convincingly, it’s necessary to adopt a platform that does benefit people in a direct, material way.

              For all the words that have been spilled about things like finger-raping a woman or January 6th or any of the other shitty things he’s done, how much of it directly impacts the average voter? The best way to reach people is by appealing to their own material interests. Instead of, “Donald Trump fucked a pornstar” how about, “Donald Trump is fucking you, right now.”

              The only time Trump lost an election was when his botched handling of COVID directly impacted people’s lives. I’m not sure what would have to happen for liberals to understand that the electorate does not give a shit about Trump’s character. And even if they did, as I pointed out, he’s not eligible to run again, so the whole thing’s moot. Maybe next time they’ll run someone clean as a whistle with the exact same policies, although, I suppose if they’re smart, they’ll run another dirtbag so liberals get distracted focusing on that.

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s not just slightly different phrasing, it’s phrasing that packs an emotional/visceral punch. The economic angle has been tried to death, and a constant refrain I hear is, “how can people vote against their own self-interests?!” It’s because the other side speaks to the animal brain, not the frontal lobes. The murder of a pretty, young nursing student activates strong emotions and has a lot more cognitive stickiness than economic arguments about who gets paid how much to pick our strawberries. Guarantee that if voters picture his grubby, little fingers sliding into a vagina in a department store dressing room, they’ll remember it.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  The economic angle has been tried to death

                  It really, really hasn’t lol.

                  and a constant refrain I hear is, “how can people vote against their own self-interests?!” It’s because the other side speaks to the animal brain, not the frontal lobes.

                  Yeah, and the animal brain wants stuff. And so do the frontal lobes, so it doesn’t really matter what part of their brain they’re using. Of course, you can’t just maintain the status quo and talk about how the other guy would be worse. The status quo sucks and is getting worse and even if it didn’t our brains aren’t wired to be satisfied with it. That messaging, sure, it’s been tried and failed, because it’s basically just lecturing people on how they’re not smart enough to understand economics and should be satisfied with what they’ve got. When I say economic messaging, I mean promising people new stuff beyond maintenance of the status quo.

                  The murder of a pretty, young nursing student activates strong emotions and has a lot more cognitive stickiness than economic arguments about who gets paid how much to pick our strawberries. Guarantee that if voters picture his grubby, little fingers sliding into a vagina in a department store dressing room, they’ll remember it.

                  Ok, I would like to collect on that guarantee, right now. Because you tried it already, over and over again, and it didn’t fucking work. I guarantee you that it won’t work if you keep trying it. If your position was at all true, Trump would’ve lost in 2016 when it first came out, when they could hear it straight from the horse’s mouth! No matter how you phrase it, it’ll never be more compelling than that moment when it first came out.

                  I repeat this for the third time since you seem to have missed it the first two times I said it: even if you were right, which you’re absolutely not, Trump isn’t even eligible to run again. Even if you’ve finally hit on the exact right phrasing that’ll definitely get through to people, this time I swear (you didn’t), you’re too late.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          They first need to admit that running as corporatists, ignoring people who are suffering in this economy, and funding a far right genocide were wrong, and the genocide was a war crime that people should go to jail for. They will never admit to that stuff though, theyd sooner disolve the party.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is often my point. There’s a major problem with the statement “Democrats need to do something in the house”. And that problem is not with the second half of the sentence, but the first. “VOTERS needed to do something in the election.” America is not just the DNC no matter how much we love finding scapegoats.

        Very very very tired of the circular logic used to blame them for losing an election to an imbecile, against promises two brain cells could have realized would never ever be delivered.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Same thing I’ve wished Democrats would do for years and years: Learn from psychology and neuroscience that language and how you use it matters, then learn how to use language to improve their messaging.

        And then do it.

        Politics in a big country like this is like an arena show, and Democrats treat it like a university lecture hall. Play to the cheap seats! For example, compare how I read that Harris would “address health care disparities which disproportionately affect Black men” versus “death tax.” Which one is more likely to reach Joe Six-Pack? Which one has more visceral impact? Which one is more, as they say, cognitively sticky?

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It would, but it’d be a poor political tactic, because the idea is to make your issue/position cognitively sticky, that is, make people remember it involuntarily. All of the engagement around flashing would be “huhuhuhuhuh boobs,” and nobody would talk about or remember the actual issue.