Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Entire video is worth watching. He also snuck a chest mounted lidar into Disney and mapped some rides.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    New stuff to add to the car kit bag for the 21st century

    1. poster board to block usonic weapons
    2. black paint, white paint, roller, brush to paint tunnels on walls
    3. orange cones to pen in self driving cars
    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In short because Elon (wrongly) believes you only need cameras, he made the claim people also drive with just 2 eyes.

      The thing is, we recognize a truck with stickers of a stopsign, while AI vision gets confused.

      Waymo (Googles self driving side hussle) was build on lidar and other sensors and has been using robot taxis for many years now in geofenced specific areas.

      • Yoga@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The thing is, we recognize a truck with stickers of a stopsign, while AI vision gets confused.

        Lmao would it be illegal to put a stop sign on the back of your car?

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And that’s what you get for cheaping out on tech and going with cameras over lidar. Not only that, but Tesla removed all the radar technology that literally every car uses for collision detection about a year ago.

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The radar module on my truck costs $70.

      The richest man on earth doesn’t think the lives of your vehicle’s passengers are worth $17.50 a pop.

      And that’s to a knuckledragger like me, buying a single radar unit online. I’m sure the manufacturer gets insane quantity discounts.

  • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I read something a while back from a guy while wearing a T-shirt with a stop sign on it, a couple robotaxies stopped in front of him. It got me thinking you could cause some chaos walking around with a speed limit 65 shirt.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They’re not reading speed limit signs; they’ll follow the speed limit noted on the reference maps, like what you see in the app on your phone.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There’s a lot of cars that check via camera too to double check, for missing/outdated information and for temporary speed limit signs.

        • Giooschi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Where I live there are a lot of “temporary” 30km/h speed limits that were never removed by the road workers after the work was completed.

        • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Lots of places also have variable limit signs that get updated based on traffic, accidents etc.

          Here in NZ those seem to all be marked on the speed limit maps as 100km/h even if in some places the signs never go above 80.

          Ngauranga Gorge is one such location and I believe has the country’s highest grossing speed camera.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yikes, there’s a 25 around here that shows up as a 55 in Google Maps.

        Also a 55 that goes down to I think 35 for just a moment when it joins up with a side road. I wonder what a Tesla would do if it was following that data.

    • audaxdreik@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think one of my favorite examples was using simple salt to trap them within the confines of white lines that they didn’t think they could cross over. I really appreciate the imagery of using salt circles to entrap the robotic demons …

    • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Teslas did this in the past. There was also the issue of thinking that the moon was a red light or something.

  • Yoga@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Insurance fraud is going to bankrupt Tesla robotaxis faster than an incompetent CEO ever could.

    There will be too many ways to defeat the cameras and not having LiDAR unlike the rest of the industry may prove to be found to be a failure of duty of care.

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is why it’s fucking stupid Tesla removed Lidar sensors and relies on cameras only.

    But also who would want a tesla, fuck em

    • AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I was horrified when I learned that the autopilot relies entirely on cameras. Nope, nope, nope.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Leon said other sensors were unnecessary because human driving is all done through the sense of sight…proving that he has no idea how humans work either (despite purportedly being a human).

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They never had lidarr. They used to have radar and uss but they decided “vision” was good enough. This conveniently occurred when they had supply chain issues during covid.

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They also removed radar, which is what allowed them to make all of those “it saw something three vehicles ahead and braked to avoid a pileup that hadn’t even started yet” videos. Removing radar was the single most impactful change Tesla made in regards to FSD, and it’s all because Musk basically decided “people drive fine with just their eyes, so cars should too.”

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Show someone footage of 9/11 and they‘ll think of 2001. Show someone footage of a burning or crashing Tesla 20 years from now and they‘ll think of 2025.

  • Billybob22@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Don’t want to rock the boat but apart from being a you tube money earner this doesn’t prove or disprove anything. A lot of humans would be fooled by this also.

    I am suspicious of the way the polystyrene wall broke in cartoon like shagged edges, almost like they were precut.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The point of the test is to demonstrate that vision-only, which Tesla has adopted is inadequate. A car with lidar or radar would have been able to “see” that the car was approaching an obstacle without being fooled by the imagary.

      So yes, it seems a bit silly, but the underlying point is legitimate. If the software is fooled by this, then can you ever fully trust it? Especially when sensor systems exist that don’t have this problem at all. Would you want to be a pedestrian in a crosswalk with this car bearing down on you in FSD?

      • Billybob22@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes but the main point that has been shown is that putting a screen up with the exact copy of the road and surroundings behind the screen is a daft and dangerous idea. It would be a better test if they had put up a polystyrene tree in the middle of the road and then checked if the car stopped.

        I have never driven through a polystyrene wall with a picture of a road on it in 40 years because people just don’t put those things up, they don’t grow on roads etc etc.

        Great YT clip for entertainment though.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The other two tests that the Tesla failed were more realistic. Heavy fog and heavy rain.

          It failed both.

          If your self driving car cannot handle weather, then it’s not self driving at all.

          Actual lidar isn’t fooled by weather. Shitty optical only cameras are.

          • Billybob22@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I have never seen a mural on a road depicting a road that is identical to the road that I am driving on. Hope that helps.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They were expecting this result to be possible. What were they supposed to do? Slam the car into the side if a building?

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It may not rise to the level of proof, but it is a memorable and easily understood demonstration of something already proven by car safety researchers, as mentioned in the article.

      Why shouldn’t they precut the wall into cartoony shapes? It adds entertainment and doesn’t compromise the demonstration.

      • Billybob22@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yep agreed. Having used Teslas adaptive cruise control I wouldn’t ever use self driving, not that I have it, unless I had a death wish. Quite honestly my previous Chinese MG was a lot less likely to kill me.