An hour spent commuting is 1/16th of your daily life, and that hour is by far the biggest risk to your life every day. You should be getting triple pay to ameliorate the hazard risk it represents.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    You should be getting triple pay to ameliorate the hazard risk it represents.

    That’s something a union can help with. Most compensation above poverty wages have been won by unioms at one point or another. Most of them a long ago and we’ve been regressing for a few decades.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    I just don’t understand why developers don’t jump on the opprtunity to build commercial offices outside of the main downtown areas, closer to where people live, this will eliminate the long and taxing commute that everyone hates and get people back in office like they want, is there some tax or zoning reason why all the office space is located downtown in the US, with hybrid work these days it would be so much better if I could just go to some co-working space close to my home

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Less congestion for people that do need to travel.

    Less pollution.

    More free time.

    Cheaper housing because we won’t all need to be clustered in the places with decent paying jobs.

    But no, fuck it all because the mega rich might have to make do with very slightly less.

  • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    it’s unpaid labor either way, it’s a bit arbitrary to say owning a car and commuting for a job isn’t time and money spent for the employer in your capacity as an employee

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m lucky enough that when my company started enforcing 5 days a week, they don’t enforce hours. I usually wake up for my first meeting then shower/get ready after, then commute. They give me free public transit, so I take the bus every time too. Plus I can bring my dog in, and I get a free nice coffee (lattes, tea, matcha, etc). Then I’ll leave the office about 3/4pm and WFH if needed.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Absolutely. I’ve been working from home for ~3 years and I’ll never go back. I have so much more time for myself (and also, no one is annoying me with smalltalk or stupid questions).

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Agreed.

    I’m lucky in several respects, being on a public transit line and only 10 minutes from work, but we have a guy on my team who drives, in his own car, 90 miles each way for our one day a week in the office. It’s dumb.

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In one single year, I commuted about 50000 km in my own car before I could move closer to my workplace. People have a hard time believing me until I point it out on a map.

  • floopus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I currently travel 2 hours to and from work, making my 9 to 5 a 7 to 7. I hate it so much lmao

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There is a study that showed workers don’t mind commuting so long as the route is full of greenery and nature. That explains a lot because in my hometown, I was happy enough to commute in public transport and people are nice enough that you can chat with them. Then I moved to a bigger city, which is a concrete jungle. I hate the commute. And mind you, the public transport in my home town is about ten to twenty minutes more depending on the traffic, but I didn’t mind for some reason. Then, after moving to a bigger city, travelling only for one hour feels like a long trek.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oh my yes. My big nastalgia thing is when I lived in a neighborhood just outside city center and my commute was three miles. I would walk it, go four miles out of my way to bike the lakefront, or if weather was bad enough take transit. Most of the time I was getting nice exercise with the commute and I could pick up some things on my way home. I mean a lot of that is just not being in a car really and of course that outside of work most everything I needed day to day was walkable.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Something like 4 minutes of my 25 minute commute is through trees, and it still makes a big difference. I think you’re on to something.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I used to have a drive to work, and it suckkkkkkkkkked. I moved, and can now cycle to work or take a nice train. I suddenly do not mind my 30 minute commute at all. I look forward to my bike ride most of the time, and I love the feeling after having done it.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I take a bus and then walk … half hour or so on the bus and half hour or so of walking. If I drive it’s like 35-45 minutes?

        However, I’m always more tired when I arrive there. Also, I’m not a fan of finding parking and stuff around the office.

    • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah honestly I don’t get the hate, maybe this is why.

      I could never live in the city. That place is dark, full of tall buildings that block out the sky and covered in trash over concrete that blocks out the ground.

      Out here in the country I have a ten minute commute and would go insane if I had to work from home. I’m quite happy to go to the office five days a week.

      I think cities are the problem, not commuting.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        On top of my suspicion that your mental image of “cities” is just downtown Manhattan, which not all cities and certainly not all parts of any city are like, the fact that you mentioned having a 10 minute commute says to me that you definitely don’t live in a rural location. Simply living in a suburb does not mean you are living in the country, and there has been research done that people are much more likely to think they live in a rural location when they very much don’t if they live in a suburb of a much more dense city.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Suburbs is actually which I hate the worst but ironically live in. It lacks the convenience of the city with no real significant increase in nature. It just has more lawns over the city and lacks a lot of plant diversity as the city is more likely to throw some trees and bushes and various greenery in the public space or require buildings to have it over the burbs which is just house and lawns. Problem is the burbs are a bit cheaper mostly and have some public transit that connects up with the city system.

      • Nelots@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think many people would complain about a 10 minute commute. My mom has a 45 minute drive to and from work each day, and works 10 hour days (4 days a week). I would go insane.

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have always felt that you should be paid for travel time for a job. If it takes 30 mins to drive to work then the company should be paying you that time.

    Look at how many bosses/CEOs bill their daily travel expenses to the company

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      That would be good except that you could literally get a job far away for “was” money, or you would disadvantage people living farther away from jobs (cities)

    • Nelots@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I wonder if this would make it harder for people to find jobs. I imagine companies would be less inclined to hire people an hour away if they had to pay for it.

  • notarobot@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I mean… It can be. You just have to ask for a raise. That is what I do. If I get a job that is further away, I expect to be paid more. One of the reasons I’m sticking with my current job even though the pay is not great, is that I’m less than 10 minutes away from home. I even get to come home for lunch.

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Upvoting, but also commenting to say that employees are at a disadvantage in almost all cases: a company can almost certainly absorb your loss but most people cannot absorb the loss of their income.

      Asking for a raise could get you fired (sorry, “let go”), especially if you’re in a position where there’s an eager new applicant just waiting for a position to open up, such as any service-industry job.

      Even niche skilled jobs are not immune. If your cost approaches the value your employer extracts from your labor, then you will be left jobless and you may find it hard to find a comparable position if your skill-set is tightly focused. If you’re the one COBOL programmer at your company, you are underpaid; the moment you demand your actual worth, they will figure out how to pivot that old code-base to something more modern, even if it costs millions of dollars to license and switch to a new ERP platform or similar bullshit.

      I’ve turned this WFH rant into a worker protection rant, so back on topic: Wouldn’t it be nice to just … not have to drive to a place to put your butt in a seat when your butt could be at a seat at home and do the exact same thing? I get that some jobs don’t work that way, but many (probably most) do.

      In 2020, we witnessed most jobs at company headquarters around the world being done at home and nothing exploded. Almost everything done from a cubicle can be done from home. Wouldn’t it be nice to knock down those buildings and make them green spaces instead?

  • visnae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Don’t you include commute in the workday? If you have 30 min to office (1h in total), and have a 7h workday, then you only need to be in office for 6 hours. And 1h of them is probably lunch?

    If company allows work from home, then they will probably maximise the number of “work” hours, as you don’t have a commute and lunch is probably quicker.

    (This is how it should be, but yes I’m joking)